decay . Thus it was necessary to look for some inverse reactions it which neutrino stake part . ,'lthough very few neutrinos out of those which would come near enough t othe other <strong>particles</strong> would take part in the reaction, it would be possible to detec tthose which did take part . The inverse reactions suggested wer en +v —► e- .4. p ,which is the well-known electron-capture reaction in reverse, an dp+7r—tee+ n .In 1956, twenty-five years after the existence of the neutrino was first postulated ,Cowan, Reines, Harrison, Kruse, and cGuire started their search for it .Their first problem was to find a sufficiently strong source of neutrinos . The ydecided to use the newly-built Savannah River nuclear power station as their source .Here, the uranium: fiseion products produced antineutrinos so that the neutrino flu xwas about 10'1 m32 . They hoped to observe the second of the reactions mentioned above .If this reaction occurred, the positron would produce a trail of ionization in aliquid scintillator (see chapter 8), and when it came to rest, its annihilatio nby a negative electron would produce two garma rays . Furthermore, if some cadmiumcompound was dropped into the scintillator liquid, this would pick up th e slow neutron ,and in doing so, would produce two high-energy gamma rays, which would show up a sflashes in the scintillator . For this reason, the experimenters sandwiched som ecadmium salt solution between two scintillators, so that the three events connecte dwith the positron would all occur practically simultaneously in the cadmium sal tlayer, and after about 10 ps, the flash from the neutron capture would be seen in th ecadmium salt together with the scintillations from the two gamma rays produced by th ecapture . It was necesoary to have a great volume of liquid (, ,-10 tonnes) in th eecintillators, and about five hundred sensitive photomultiplier tubes to detect th etiny flashes of light .Spurious events were sometimes detected by some discrepency in timing and sometime sby the use of a third target and scintillator fixed in anticoincidence with th ephotomultiplier tubes . The experiment ran for around 1400 hours, with about on eevent per hour . When it had finished, various checks were run, such as substitutingheavy water (DL O) for water, in which case no events were detected, and in late 1956 ,the discovery of the neutrino was formally announced .4hile Cowan and Reines were searchirg for neutrinos by the method outlined above ,Davis, Harmer, and Iloffmann, a group of chemists from Brookhaven, were trying t odetect them by other means . It had been shown that when a neutrino interacted wit hthe isotope chlorine-37, the radioactive gas argon-37 was produced, with the emissio nof an electron . In their first experiment, the chemists placed a tank containing 500gallons of carbon tetrachloride (CC14 ) in a heavily-shielded position near the Savanna hRiver plant . Helium was bubbled through the tank to clear it of any argon, and th etank was then left untouched for about thirty days . After this tire, helium war againbubbled through the liquid, and any radioactive argon came out with it . The twomiscible gases were then cooled in a liquid nitrogen cooling apparatus, and wer efractionally separated . The argon was then tested with a Geiger counter, and it wasfound to exhibit traces of K-electron capture radiation .One of the most important reactions thought to be taking place in the sun i sp+p—,rd+e+Y ,and this should produce a neutrino flux of about 1O 15 sh2 on the surface of the earth .For this reason, it was decided that a larger and better neutrino detector should b ebuilt to study these solar neutrinos . Using the same principle as Davis' first detector,a tank containing 500 tonnes of liquid perchloroethylene (CzCl 4 ) was placed in the
Homestake gold mine in South Dakota, U .S .A . M. ny more detectors of this type have bee nbuilt since 1958, notably the new one in south Africa, which is buried 10 750' belo wground level in a disused mine .The background noise of neutrinos from cosmic sources is about 0 .3 events per day .It was calculated that there should be about four or five events per day due to sola rneutrinos in the larger detectors . However, the maximum figure obtained so far is 1 . 2events per day, much less than predicted . Various theories were advanced to accoun tfor this seeming lack of solar neutrinos, of which we shall here discuss the mos timportant ones . Rachall and Fowler soon suggested the obvious solution that some o fthe accepted values for the sum's age, luminosity, or composition, are in error, thuscausing the low neutrino flux, but there is no substantial evidence to back up thei rtheory, and so we must probably search for a more fundamental cause . Cameron suggeste dthat the neutrino-producing reaction did not occur to such a large extent as wa sassumed in the sun's interior . It was originally thought that the exterior regions o fthe sun were spinning much slower than the interior onee, thus allowing a number o funcommon nuclear reactions to occur in the latter, bu t- Cameron suggests that in th ecentre of the sun, large-scale mixing occurs, thus reducing the neutrino flux to th eupper limits of current observations . In fact, Cameron's theory gains support from amost unlikely source : Dicke's attempt to disprove the General Theory of Relativity .Dicke believes that the sun is flattened because the interior is spinning about sixtee ntimes faster than was previously thought, thus causing it to have a slightly differen tgravitational f i eld than is thought, and causing Mercury to advance its perihelion ,which is usually thought of as a relativistic effect . Dicke and his co-workers h avemade accurate measurements. of the sun's shape, and are convinced that it is slightl yoblate .But the sun is by no means the only star which should emit neutrinos . It seem slikely that every hot star in the universe is a neutrino emitter, and, becaus eneutrinos are so unreactive, this neutrino flux should reach Earth intact . Thebrightest neutrino emitters appear to be novae, supernovae, and cuasars . An idea byGamow and Shoenberg, called the Urca process, could link the formation of novae an dtheir high rate of neutrino emission . This th e ory proposes that in certain stare, vas tamounts of energy are converted into neutrinos, possibly in the form of neutrinoantineutrinopairs, which then propagate freely in space . After this release of en e rgy ,the star's central, and previously hot, region, from which the neutrinos were emitted ,cools down, causing the star to implode . The Turca process is the absorbtion of a nelectron with an 'energy grea t er than 10 ReV by an atomic nucleus in which a proton ,with the emission of a neutrino, becomes a neutron . The newly-formed unstable isotop ewill soon de cay again into the original stable nucleus with the emission of an electro nand an antineutrino, as in the Fermi process . The Urea process would begin when th etemperature inside a coilepsing star rose above about 200 PI C .Let us now consider the possible emission of neutrino-antineutrino pairs from veryhot stars . Obviously photon can not, in a one-stage process, yield these pairs . But ,if sufficiently high-energy photons are produced, these will t e nd to materialise intovirtual electron-positron and sometimes neutrino-antineutrino pairs . Due to the extrem eunreactiv enese of neutrinos, there pair, . will tend not to annihilate each other .However, the electron-pod run pair, will use it cny into more gr,mme rays, rhlch ni i ]materialise again, and so on . The only comparatively stable constituent of this cycl eare the neutrino-antineutrino pairs which would then propagate freely in space . I felectron-neutrino reactions are found to occur, they might be slightly hindered, but
- Page 1 and 2: ~~N ."$ II itOL'it At .AQo
- Page 3: CONTENT S .Chapter OneThe Early His
- Page 9 and 10: nA and n e are substituted in the f
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER TWO : SORE BASIC PRINCIPLES
- Page 13 and 14: Let us now consider the evidence fo
- Page 15 and 16: the light they emit . Heisenberg kn
- Page 17 and 18: Beats are heard of frequency v . If
- Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER THREE : THE EXCLUSION PRINC
- Page 21 and 22: order to have the radius of curvatu
- Page 23 and 24: had been definitely recorded .Let u
- Page 25 and 26: were looking for, experimenters set
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER FOUR : THE 'PROLIFERATION O
- Page 29 and 30: about 9 .5 x 10-u s . A few years l
- Page 31 and 32: 1953, by seeing what, if any, polar
- Page 33 and 34: he built up a new algebra . We see,
- Page 35: lambda particles are preferentially
- Page 39 and 40: so that 907(, of the pions were abe
- Page 41 and 42: postulates that any particle exist
- Page 43 and 44: type of particles which decay in th
- Page 45 and 46: A large number of n -N resonances h
- Page 47 and 48: was discovered in the course of the
- Page 49 and 50: where s and t are the riandelstam v
- Page 51 and 52: any single energy, both the s- and
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER SIX : SYMMETRY AND STRUCTUR
- Page 55 and 56: is 1 .3 x 10 s . The leaders o; is,
- Page 57 and 58: called 'parallelogram rule' of Matt
- Page 59 and 60: Let us now consider the quarks or a
- Page 61 and 62: in the first reaction are due to it
- Page 63 and 64: charge of the nucleon cloud is slig
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER SEVEN : INTERACTIONS .Physi
- Page 67 and 68: of an electromagnetic decay need no
- Page 69 and 70: Different scattering graphs caused
- Page 71 and 72: of radius about 3 x 10 -" m, which
- Page 73 and 74: that the beta decay process of the
- Page 75 and 76: photon, .4•*l, and for the antiph
- Page 77 and 78: should expect some asymmetry in the
- Page 79 and 80: p where L is the orbital momentum o
- Page 81 and 82: about 70°' of the ne utrons . Afte
- Page 83 and 84: We consider an isolated system of n
- Page 85 and 86: on their spins . We find that if we
- Page 87 and 88:
device : scalers, which record the
- Page 89 and 90:
In appearance, semiconductor partic
- Page 91 and 92:
Usually, photons passing through a
- Page 93 and 94:
during this short time, worthwhile
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER NINE: THE ACCELERATION OF P
- Page 97 and 98:
1931 Sloan and Lawrence built a thi
- Page 99 and 100:
faster than light . instead, the ph
- Page 101 and 102:
employed for each function . In act
- Page 103 and 104:
and again by Budker and Veksler in
- Page 105 and 106:
BIBLIOGRAPHY .General works :The Ph
- Page 107 and 108:
Scalar : .esons may ihplain by the
- Page 109 and 110:
Name S J I I s U P GY ND ND 1 ND ND
- Page 111 and 112:
p5,55' 77 6570p 070601,.635 67.7355
- Page 113 and 114:
A .3 Quark combinations to fora sta
- Page 115 and 116:
s+ki # 13 .41M.V I9mo. dxry nvla)33
- Page 117 and 118:
k.1515e.pr rim
- Page 119 and 120:
° Prix.-.,a..u(14751 o IMfon.ly ca
- Page 121 and 122:
A .5 Conservation and invariance la
- Page 123 and 124:
F_AG Fixed field alternating gradie
- Page 125 and 126:
S Scalar gamma matrix product .S En
- Page 127 and 128:
Elastic cross—section .Inelastic
- Page 129 and 130:
C .3 Compound SI units used in this
- Page 131 and 132:
w oE >< k)- c; ev--o ;,o»,--.@r«-
- Page 133:
APPENDIX F : PHYSICAL CONSTANTS .(F