Thus we may say tha tErr : P/n ,where P is the probability that the A <strong>particles</strong> from the beam react with the B<strong>particles</strong> in the target . We may think of cross-section using the following model :a circular disc, corresponding to its field of influence, of area d--units is assignedto each'B particle in the target . The discs are orientated perpendicularly to th eapproaching beam, and if an A particle hitsa disc, it undergoes change, whereas if i tdoes not, it proceeds unaffected . We have n B <strong>particles</strong>, each of area 6rmTPer uni tarea of our thin target . Thus the total area, T, covered by the B <strong>particles</strong> is n 6T.T .Thus an area T of the target is 'opaque', while the rest of the area, (1-T) is trans -parent to the approaching ,articles . Thus the probability of interaction, P, in thi sthin target, between the A and B <strong>particles</strong> is seen to be fl -a,-Let us now try and generalise our result ford-gar for thicker targets . Let P(n) b ethe probability that an A particle is removed from the beam by a thin layer of B<strong>particles</strong> of projected surface density n . G(n) is the probability of transmissionthrough this layer . ObviouslyG(n) c 1 - P(n) .Let us place two layers, one of projected surface density n„ and the other of projectedsurface density n , , on top of each other, so that their total surface density i s(n,- en,.) . Thus, the probability that a particle passes through both layers is given byG(n,+ n 2) G(ni) .G(n2) .This equation must be true for any positive real numbers n, and n, . . Thus the generalsolution i sG(n) exp(-Kn) ,where K is any real constant . Thus we hav eP(n) 1 - exp(-Kn) .As n tends to zero, P(n)/n tends to K, so that we may conclude that K 6,, . Thus w ehave the relationP(n) = 1 - exp(-n6ts. )for our probability of interaction . The cross-section of a collision process i susually computed using this formula . A common measurement of cross-section in subatomi cprocesses is the barn (b) or millibarn (mb) . 1 barn lO ~m2 , and 1 mb = 10 zl m 2 .Total cross-section, 6ror or 6, as defined as the cross-section of all the processe swhich scatter or otherwise remove <strong>particles</strong> from the primary beam . Elastic cross-section ,6E,, is the cross-section for elastic scattering, for exampl ep-f p —4 P~P •cross-section, or reaction cross-section is given byInelastic`6 ,Ne L - 6r - d E LWe can also define a differential cross-section, dd/dlt, by the equatio nhI/I = ((d6/dA)ASL)Pux ,where x is the target thickness, and LEI/I is the fraction of the total beam flu xscattered into a solid angle &a, and N is the number of <strong>particles</strong> in the target pe runit area . It is often useful to define this differential cross-section so that it i srelativistically invariant, but we will not do this here .Until now, we have concerned ourselves purely with those <strong>particles</strong> which decay vi athe weak or electromagnetic interaction in a comparatively long amount of time .Particles with weak decay modes are termed semi-stable, and those with electromagn eticones, meta-stable . But we might ask ourselves if there are also <strong>particles</strong> whic hdecay by the strong interaction, in a correspondingly short amount of time . The
type of <strong>particles</strong> which decay in this way are the resonance <strong>particles</strong> .Perhaps the commonest and most important of all systems in high-energy <strong>physics</strong> i sthe pion-nucleon, si U, system . We know that I,01 and I,+'- . Thus, the possible i-spi nstates for the system ar e(I , I3) (3/2, 3/2), (3/ 2 , 1 /2 ), (3/2, -1/2), (3/2, -3/ 2), ( 1 /2 , 1/2), (1/2, -1 /2) .Thus we can say that the first four and the last two of these states behaveidentically under the strong interaction, since it is charge-independent . Using theClebsch-Gorda- coefficients, we find that the following i-spin waves are possibl e(3/2, 312) - n ' P(3/2, 1/2) = 4 l/3 -en + ./2/3 - e P(3/2, -1 / 2 ) ° 42/3 12 ' n + 41/3 v '' p(3/2, -3/2) = TT - n( 1 / 2 , 1 /2) = 42/3 1r'n + 41/31l°P( 1 /2 , -1 /2 ) _ 41/3 n'n + 42/3 1''P .Thus we see that we can represent the 'scattering amplitude' for the T{'-N syste musing two cross-sections instead of six, sine ., all the possible i-spin states excep tfor two are compounded from pure i-spin states 3/2 and 1/2 . We see that there areonly three processes with pure i-spin states :R " —*IT'' nTrP — el( PBy finding the scattering amplitudes A(3/2) and A(1/2) it is possible to calculate th eratio between the cross-sections for these processes . It is almost impossible t opredict scattering amplitudes of this type using current principles, so we will hav eto resort to experimental results .A beam of charged pions is produced by the interaction of a synchrotron proto nbeam with a metal target . Th e resultant becea is then momentum-enalvmcd in a ma gne tand suitably collimated, after which it impringes on a li quid hydrogen (proton) target .The resultant pion and protonsare th en detected by counter t e lescopes and agai nmomentum analysed . If the cross-section of int eraction is plott ed against the pian okinetic energy, then a striking peak i .e obtained when the pion energy is around 180.eV . At this point, the cross-sections for the three processes mentioned earlier arerespectively 105 mb, 23 mb, and 45 mb, so that the ratio of cross-sections is abou t9 :1 :2 . This indicates that the r e action is caused at this point primarily with particle swhose total i-spin, T, is 3/2 . This experiment was first performed by h .Ferni in 105 2using the Chicago university cyclotron .A few years later it was sufgeeted that this anomaly could be account-d for ifa new composite particle was formed when the incident pion energy was around 180 ;eV .By measuring the final momenta of the pion and proton, it was possible to establishthat this new particle, if it existed, had a mass of around 1233MeW . It was the firs tresonanc e particle to be dieeovered, and was named the A. particle . We reme mber tha tthe i-spin of its d e cay products tends to be 3/2, and so we must conclude that it ha sa multiplicity of four and is thus a quadruplet . If we m. asure the bandwidth,f , o fthe peak representing the 4. particle on our initial graph, we find that it is about120 Kell. This therefore is the uncertainty in our mass measurement . Recalling th euncertainty relation, (see chapt e r 2 )GLrAt > ,and remembering that energy is equivalent to mass, we find that the lifetime of thi sresonance is about 1.0 1s, as we would expect from its strong decay . We may therefore
- Page 1 and 2: ~~N ."$ II itOL'it At .AQo
- Page 3: CONTENT S .Chapter OneThe Early His
- Page 9 and 10: nA and n e are substituted in the f
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER TWO : SORE BASIC PRINCIPLES
- Page 13 and 14: Let us now consider the evidence fo
- Page 15 and 16: the light they emit . Heisenberg kn
- Page 17 and 18: Beats are heard of frequency v . If
- Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER THREE : THE EXCLUSION PRINC
- Page 21 and 22: order to have the radius of curvatu
- Page 23 and 24: had been definitely recorded .Let u
- Page 25 and 26: were looking for, experimenters set
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER FOUR : THE 'PROLIFERATION O
- Page 29 and 30: about 9 .5 x 10-u s . A few years l
- Page 31 and 32: 1953, by seeing what, if any, polar
- Page 33 and 34: he built up a new algebra . We see,
- Page 35 and 36: lambda particles are preferentially
- Page 37 and 38: Homestake gold mine in South Dakota
- Page 39 and 40: so that 907(, of the pions were abe
- Page 41: postulates that any particle exist
- Page 45 and 46: A large number of n -N resonances h
- Page 47 and 48: was discovered in the course of the
- Page 49 and 50: where s and t are the riandelstam v
- Page 51 and 52: any single energy, both the s- and
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER SIX : SYMMETRY AND STRUCTUR
- Page 55 and 56: is 1 .3 x 10 s . The leaders o; is,
- Page 57 and 58: called 'parallelogram rule' of Matt
- Page 59 and 60: Let us now consider the quarks or a
- Page 61 and 62: in the first reaction are due to it
- Page 63 and 64: charge of the nucleon cloud is slig
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER SEVEN : INTERACTIONS .Physi
- Page 67 and 68: of an electromagnetic decay need no
- Page 69 and 70: Different scattering graphs caused
- Page 71 and 72: of radius about 3 x 10 -" m, which
- Page 73 and 74: that the beta decay process of the
- Page 75 and 76: photon, .4•*l, and for the antiph
- Page 77 and 78: should expect some asymmetry in the
- Page 79 and 80: p where L is the orbital momentum o
- Page 81 and 82: about 70°' of the ne utrons . Afte
- Page 83 and 84: We consider an isolated system of n
- Page 85 and 86: on their spins . We find that if we
- Page 87 and 88: device : scalers, which record the
- Page 89 and 90: In appearance, semiconductor partic
- Page 91 and 92: Usually, photons passing through a
- Page 93 and 94:
during this short time, worthwhile
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER NINE: THE ACCELERATION OF P
- Page 97 and 98:
1931 Sloan and Lawrence built a thi
- Page 99 and 100:
faster than light . instead, the ph
- Page 101 and 102:
employed for each function . In act
- Page 103 and 104:
and again by Budker and Veksler in
- Page 105 and 106:
BIBLIOGRAPHY .General works :The Ph
- Page 107 and 108:
Scalar : .esons may ihplain by the
- Page 109 and 110:
Name S J I I s U P GY ND ND 1 ND ND
- Page 111 and 112:
p5,55' 77 6570p 070601,.635 67.7355
- Page 113 and 114:
A .3 Quark combinations to fora sta
- Page 115 and 116:
s+ki # 13 .41M.V I9mo. dxry nvla)33
- Page 117 and 118:
k.1515e.pr rim
- Page 119 and 120:
° Prix.-.,a..u(14751 o IMfon.ly ca
- Page 121 and 122:
A .5 Conservation and invariance la
- Page 123 and 124:
F_AG Fixed field alternating gradie
- Page 125 and 126:
S Scalar gamma matrix product .S En
- Page 127 and 128:
Elastic cross—section .Inelastic
- Page 129 and 130:
C .3 Compound SI units used in this
- Page 131 and 132:
w oE >< k)- c; ev--o ;,o»,--.@r«-
- Page 133:
APPENDIX F : PHYSICAL CONSTANTS .(F