dwarf, and stopping the star, which would otherwise have gravitationally collapsed ,from collapsing inwards .But the 'reclusion Principle does not only apply to electrons in any condition . I nthe mid-1950's it was found that protons and neutrons also obeyed it, so that no twoprotons in a given atomic nucleus could have the same energy and spin, and similarly ,neither could any two free protons . This extension of the reclusion Principle le dto the discovery of the so-called 'magic numbers', which are simply the numbers o fnucleons which each nuclear shell can hold . These numbers are 2, 8, 14, 20, 28, 50 ,82, 126 and, apart from corresponding to the number of <strong>particles</strong> which a nuclea rshell can hold, they also correspond to the number of electrons which electron shell scan hold .Now let us consider the Exclusion Principle from the standpoint of wave mechanics .We interpret different energy levels as being different 'vibration modes' . Thus, whe nin classical theory we would say that an electron moved into another orbit of higherenergy, we would now say that it is statistically likely that one vibration mode die sout, and another, at a higher energy, is born . ;row our rtcclusion Principle state sthat, just as one can not strike a key on a piano twice simultaneously, so no tw ovibration modes or waves with the same energy and spin can exist at the same time .it was in terms of wave functions that Pauli initially stated and proved his :occlusio nPrinciple . We find that, if the <strong>particles</strong> in question are p and q, and the paramete rwe are attempting to measure is A, then, adding a normalisation factor of two, we have :r(Ae Ay) _ (1W.V.)N2 and 1F(n , Ay) ° (Wp 'r)I 3L .The first of these wave functions is said to be symmetric, because when we interchang ethe two <strong>particles</strong>, this does not result in a change of sign, whereas the second functio nis antisymmetric, because, by swopping around p and q, we change the sign of th eoverall function . But how can two functions be both equal and opposite in sign: Th eonly answer is that both are z ero, and that therfore the probability of two particle sbeing identical in any set of parameters is zero, we see that the reclusion Principl edoes not only apply to energy and spin, but also, for example, to space and time .in this example, we discover the fact that no <strong>particles</strong> which obey the & elusionrrinciple may be in the same place at the same time, it is this result that stops allmatter from disintegrating immediately, because <strong>particles</strong> like photons may be hoarde dtogether in as large a quantity as is desired in the same space-time .Rut probably the most important consequence of the Exclusion Principle was Dirac' stheory of positrons . In 1928 P .Dirac developed a wave equation, known as the Dira cequation, in accordance with Relativity and wave mechanics, which described the motio nand properties of the electron in exact agreement with its experimentally observe dcharacteristics . However, one of the most far-reaching results of this equation wa sthat it was found that the electron could have negative energy and mass because of th eexistence of a negative root of the expressionj((m_c a )' )/(1-(v/c)z ) which was foundto represent its relativistic energy. Dirac did not immediately understand th esignificance of this negative root and would have simply assumed it to be an unrealsolution to his problem, had it not been for the discovery of the positron in 1933 .On August the second, 1933, while photographing cosmic ray tracks obtained in a15 000 gauss vertical Wilson cloud chamber, C .Anderson noticed some tracks which coul donly be explained as having been produced by the passage of a particle of similar mas sto an electron, but carrying a positive charge . Inside the cloud chamber there wa sa 6 mm thick lead plate, through which the new particle passed, and in doing so ,changed the curvature of its track . If this positive particle were a proton, then, in
order to have the radius of curvature which its track had, it would have to have a nenergy of 300 000 V, and if it did have this energy, then it would go only about atenth as far as the observed track went, so that the idea that the new particle wa sa proton was discounted . The other major possibility was that a photon, which naturall ydid not leave a track in the cloud chamber, hit the lead plate and knocked two particle sout of one of the lead nuclei, one of which went above the plate and one below, bu tthis hypothesis still leads to the conclusion that one of these <strong>particles</strong> was an anti -electron or positron .This discovery caused Dirac to continue his theory of positive electrons . H efinally came up with the hypothesis that there exists, in the same space-time as thi suniverse, a kind of anther or sea of negative mass electrons posessing negative energy .These would be permitted by the Exclusion Principle, and would be, under norma lcircumstances, unobservable, because they are always there, and no instruments arecalibrated so as to measure without their presence . Much the same type of reaso nstopped scientists from finding out what air really was for many centuries . Dirac' stheory led to the slightly unlikely idea that the 'extraordinary' negative energy andmass states were in fact more stable than the ordinary positive energy ones . However ,the tendency of an electron to jump to a lower energy level by the emission of a gammaray would mean that all electrons would try and jump into the negative energy state .But Dirac suggested that all the negative energy levels were full up, and so th eExclusion Principle would not permit any more electrons to attain a negative energy .The total energy of an electron is given by T .s m,c , where T is its kinetic energyand m, is its rest mass . Thus no positive energy electron may have an energy less tha nm . , the rest mass of the electron, and no negative energy one of more than -me . Hence,in order to raise a negative energy electron to a positive energy, it is necessary togive it an energy of at least 2r ,, which is about 1 .022 XeV . When a gamma ray of mor ethan this threshold energy passed through, for example, the Coulomb or electrostati cfield of an atom, a negative energy electron was raised to positive energy, and abubble was left in the sea of negative energy electrons . This bubble had exactlyopposite characteristics to the electron, and had a positive charge . Sometimes, th eso-called 'virtual pair' of an electron and a positron would form an atom of positronium ,a sort of anti-hydrogen atom consisting of a positron in orbit around an electron ,which, after a mean life of 8 ns would decay again into two gamma rays, each with th eenergy of an electron . Alternatively the electron and positron would travel freel yfor about 7 ).as and then decay into two or three gamma rays . Dirac's theory proposedthat when this happened, the electron fell back into the hole in the negative energyaether, so that, due to the Law of the Conservation of Mass and Energy, the fina lgamma rays must have exactly the same energy as the initial gamma ray . Possibly eachof the final gamma rays are emitted at different points in the electron's descent int othe negative energy state .But Dirac postulated that not only electrons had anti<strong>particles</strong>, but also that al l<strong>particles</strong> have their corresponding anti<strong>particles</strong> . Thus in 1956 Chamberlain and hi sco-workers began to search for the antiproton . They calculated that the threshol denergy for its production was about 5 .6 GeV .It was proposed that when two high-energyprotons collide, two other protons and a proton-antiproton virtual pair are produced .At Berkeley, Chamberlain, Cegre, 'rd egand, and Ypsilantis accelerated a proton beamto an energy of around 6 .2 GeV in their Bevatron accelerator, and then made it hi ta copper target . The resultant <strong>particles</strong> thenpassed through a series of magnets, sothat only <strong>particles</strong> with a negative charge, and with a mass in the order of that of
- Page 1 and 2: ~~N ."$ II itOL'it At .AQo
- Page 3: CONTENT S .Chapter OneThe Early His
- Page 9 and 10: nA and n e are substituted in the f
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER TWO : SORE BASIC PRINCIPLES
- Page 13 and 14: Let us now consider the evidence fo
- Page 15 and 16: the light they emit . Heisenberg kn
- Page 17 and 18: Beats are heard of frequency v . If
- Page 19: CHAPTER THREE : THE EXCLUSION PRINC
- Page 23 and 24: had been definitely recorded .Let u
- Page 25 and 26: were looking for, experimenters set
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER FOUR : THE 'PROLIFERATION O
- Page 29 and 30: about 9 .5 x 10-u s . A few years l
- Page 31 and 32: 1953, by seeing what, if any, polar
- Page 33 and 34: he built up a new algebra . We see,
- Page 35 and 36: lambda particles are preferentially
- Page 37 and 38: Homestake gold mine in South Dakota
- Page 39 and 40: so that 907(, of the pions were abe
- Page 41 and 42: postulates that any particle exist
- Page 43 and 44: type of particles which decay in th
- Page 45 and 46: A large number of n -N resonances h
- Page 47 and 48: was discovered in the course of the
- Page 49 and 50: where s and t are the riandelstam v
- Page 51 and 52: any single energy, both the s- and
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER SIX : SYMMETRY AND STRUCTUR
- Page 55 and 56: is 1 .3 x 10 s . The leaders o; is,
- Page 57 and 58: called 'parallelogram rule' of Matt
- Page 59 and 60: Let us now consider the quarks or a
- Page 61 and 62: in the first reaction are due to it
- Page 63 and 64: charge of the nucleon cloud is slig
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER SEVEN : INTERACTIONS .Physi
- Page 67 and 68: of an electromagnetic decay need no
- Page 69 and 70: Different scattering graphs caused
- Page 71 and 72:
of radius about 3 x 10 -" m, which
- Page 73 and 74:
that the beta decay process of the
- Page 75 and 76:
photon, .4•*l, and for the antiph
- Page 77 and 78:
should expect some asymmetry in the
- Page 79 and 80:
p where L is the orbital momentum o
- Page 81 and 82:
about 70°' of the ne utrons . Afte
- Page 83 and 84:
We consider an isolated system of n
- Page 85 and 86:
on their spins . We find that if we
- Page 87 and 88:
device : scalers, which record the
- Page 89 and 90:
In appearance, semiconductor partic
- Page 91 and 92:
Usually, photons passing through a
- Page 93 and 94:
during this short time, worthwhile
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER NINE: THE ACCELERATION OF P
- Page 97 and 98:
1931 Sloan and Lawrence built a thi
- Page 99 and 100:
faster than light . instead, the ph
- Page 101 and 102:
employed for each function . In act
- Page 103 and 104:
and again by Budker and Veksler in
- Page 105 and 106:
BIBLIOGRAPHY .General works :The Ph
- Page 107 and 108:
Scalar : .esons may ihplain by the
- Page 109 and 110:
Name S J I I s U P GY ND ND 1 ND ND
- Page 111 and 112:
p5,55' 77 6570p 070601,.635 67.7355
- Page 113 and 114:
A .3 Quark combinations to fora sta
- Page 115 and 116:
s+ki # 13 .41M.V I9mo. dxry nvla)33
- Page 117 and 118:
k.1515e.pr rim
- Page 119 and 120:
° Prix.-.,a..u(14751 o IMfon.ly ca
- Page 121 and 122:
A .5 Conservation and invariance la
- Page 123 and 124:
F_AG Fixed field alternating gradie
- Page 125 and 126:
S Scalar gamma matrix product .S En
- Page 127 and 128:
Elastic cross—section .Inelastic
- Page 129 and 130:
C .3 Compound SI units used in this
- Page 131 and 132:
w oE >< k)- c; ev--o ;,o»,--.@r«-
- Page 133:
APPENDIX F : PHYSICAL CONSTANTS .(F