after this experiment, W .Zinn showed that neutrons were also subject to de Broglie' sequation . Neutrons from a chain-reacting pile were slowed down by graphite blocks ,and were then collimated by a series of cadmium slits . They were then reflected fro mthe face of a calcite crystal, and detected by means of a boron trifluoride counter .In 1926, two comparatively contemporary theories of <strong>particles</strong> as waves grew up .The first was the matrix mechanics of ;.Heisenberg, and the second the wave equation o f: .Schrtldinger . Although very different in their approach, Schrddinger, as we shal ldiscuss later, finally showed that the two theories were equivalent . We shall firs tdiscuss the SchrBdinger equation, because it is the simpler of the two methods . As i twas first formulated, the Schrtldinger equation made two assumptions about the particl esystem which it attempted to describe . First, it assumed that no <strong>particles</strong> were eithe rcreated or destroyed, and that therefore the number of <strong>particles</strong> of a given type i nour system always remained constant, and second, that the velocities of all th e<strong>particles</strong> concerned were small enough for non-relativistic approximations to be valid .We represent our wave function by 14r(x, t) . Born's interpretation of this wave functio nstates that the probability that we find our particle in a small region of space ,volume d3 (x) is proportional toh4r(x,t) l l d; (x) . Thus the probability density i sproportional to the absolute square of the wave function . Similarly the intensity ofa classical light wave is said to be proportional to the square of its amplitude .There was at first considerable discussion concerning the reality of mechanical waves ,but Born's idea puts this aside . It implies that the wave-like character of particle sis essentially to do with the fact that the probability function If satisfies a wav eequation . Thus, if we have, for example, a shower of scattered electrons, we may sa ythat if there are a large number of <strong>particles</strong>, we are most likely to find <strong>particles</strong> i nthe regions where the absolute squares of their wave functions are large . The probab -ility of finding a particle in a space, volume dxdydz units, is defined as dxdydz .As the particle must exist somewhere in space, and as most probabilities are measure das a fraction of unity, it is natural that we should apply what is known as anormalisation factor in order to make S~1fr dxdydz equal to one . In fact, Schrddinger' swave equation was defined such that :iM 1-(x t) = - LV''y1(x,t)2sl,where i is the square root of minus one, h is Planck's constant, and 'eis the Laplacianoperator, which is defined by :®1— a1+ V.4 VLax,Sxi bx iLet us now discuss an important principle in wave mechanics known as the super -position of waves . A light beam is very rarely truly monochromatic . Thus, its classicalwave is not pure, but consists of a number of partial waves, each of a differen tfrequency, superposed on each other . A pure wave has a well-defined energy given b ythe Planck- ;instein formula, and thus, in a superposed wave, the intensity of each o fits partial waves is a measure of the probability that the complete wave has the sam efrequency as that wave at the moment when it is measured . Using a superpositionmethod, Schrtldinger showed that Bohr's model of the atom could be derived using wav emechanics, because all the waves of the electrons must be stationary or standing waves .A standing wave is one in which there are a number of fixed nodes, between whic hoscillations take place .,fie must now consider the more important consequences of W .IIeisenberg's matri xmechanics, which he developed in 1923, while studying under M .Born at GBttingen .Heisenberg realised that very little was known about atoms, except for the nature of
the light they emit . Heisenberg knew, from the Planck-Einstein equation, that th efrequency of the light emitted when an electron jumps between the i- and k-energyquantum levels is given by:r : - r kvG =h h 'where r;p is the transition frequency, B ; is the eo rgy of the i th orbit, and Ek tha tof the k th orbit . According to Einstein's theory of light, the intensity of eac hfrequency is determined by the number of photons of that frequency emitted by a groupof excited atoms . Thus we need to know the probability of transition from the i t hto k th levels . It is obvious that we may represent this probability as P (i,k) . I fwe substitute a series o f numbers for i and k, then we can build up, as Heisenber gdid, a matrix in the form of an infinite s quare . But the parameter we represent in ou rmatrix need be neither the frequency of the emitted photon, nor the transitio nprobability, but any parameter associated with electron levels . Let us have one parameterA, represented by the matrix a, and another, B, represented by b . We can seethat the matrix addition is corsatative,that is, a +b b+ a, but that the matri xmultiplication is non-commutative . Using this curious non-commutativity of his ne walgebra, Heisenberg managed to obtain the equationxv-vx s h/2sim ,where x is the position of a particle, v is its velocity, m is its mass, i is th esquare root of minus one, and h is Planck's constant . However, as Planck's constan tis very small indeed, the equation will only become important when m is also ver ysmall, otherwise the factor h/m . O . Heisenberg had now established an algebra, i nwhich, instead of using finite numbers, he used infinite matrices . These he decided t oapply to the equations of classical mechanics . He did this with considerable sucess ,arriving at Bohr's atomic model and the Planck-rinstein formula .In his work on wave mechanics Schrldinger associated every physical paramete rwith an operator or operation . For example, the symmetrical nature of an object mightbe related to the operator F, the space reflection operator (see chapter 7) . Eachpossible electron orbit in an atom, SchrBdinger saw, could be represented by one o fthe stationary waves in the series yf,11f,, NE, ,+ . . . . He considered a physical parameterA, with its associated operator a . For the transition between the i th and k th level she defined a number a• ,h , which depended both upon the physical parameter A, and th etwo stationary waves 'yr; and '4 . By considering all the possible transitions, h edrew up a table for all the corresponding values of a ; k , which he proved, because ofthe nature of the o p erator he had chosen, was equivalent to one of Heisenberg' smatrices, and behaved in the sane way .Now let us consider one of the most important consequences of the new methods o fwave and matrix mechanics : Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle . One would, at firs tsight, assume that it would be possible to measure the position and velocity of, forexample, a falling stone, as accurately as was re q uired, so long as the measurin gequipment was good enough . The simplest way to measure both the velocity and positio nis this case would be to take a film of the stone's motion with a tine camera using a ninfinitely fast-moving, infinitely mall-grained, film . But in order to photograph th estone, we must illuminate it . However, the photons which we use to illuminate thi sstone will not strike it precisely evenly from all directions, and so they will alterthe parameters which we are trying to measure . If we decrease the intensity of th elight, which corresponds to reducing the number of photons in the beam, then the light -pressure on the stone will become even more irregular . However, let us assume that we
- Page 1 and 2: ~~N ."$ II itOL'it At .AQo
- Page 3: CONTENT S .Chapter OneThe Early His
- Page 9 and 10: nA and n e are substituted in the f
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER TWO : SORE BASIC PRINCIPLES
- Page 13: Let us now consider the evidence fo
- Page 17 and 18: Beats are heard of frequency v . If
- Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER THREE : THE EXCLUSION PRINC
- Page 21 and 22: order to have the radius of curvatu
- Page 23 and 24: had been definitely recorded .Let u
- Page 25 and 26: were looking for, experimenters set
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER FOUR : THE 'PROLIFERATION O
- Page 29 and 30: about 9 .5 x 10-u s . A few years l
- Page 31 and 32: 1953, by seeing what, if any, polar
- Page 33 and 34: he built up a new algebra . We see,
- Page 35 and 36: lambda particles are preferentially
- Page 37 and 38: Homestake gold mine in South Dakota
- Page 39 and 40: so that 907(, of the pions were abe
- Page 41 and 42: postulates that any particle exist
- Page 43 and 44: type of particles which decay in th
- Page 45 and 46: A large number of n -N resonances h
- Page 47 and 48: was discovered in the course of the
- Page 49 and 50: where s and t are the riandelstam v
- Page 51 and 52: any single energy, both the s- and
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER SIX : SYMMETRY AND STRUCTUR
- Page 55 and 56: is 1 .3 x 10 s . The leaders o; is,
- Page 57 and 58: called 'parallelogram rule' of Matt
- Page 59 and 60: Let us now consider the quarks or a
- Page 61 and 62: in the first reaction are due to it
- Page 63 and 64: charge of the nucleon cloud is slig
- Page 65 and 66:
CHAPTER SEVEN : INTERACTIONS .Physi
- Page 67 and 68:
of an electromagnetic decay need no
- Page 69 and 70:
Different scattering graphs caused
- Page 71 and 72:
of radius about 3 x 10 -" m, which
- Page 73 and 74:
that the beta decay process of the
- Page 75 and 76:
photon, .4•*l, and for the antiph
- Page 77 and 78:
should expect some asymmetry in the
- Page 79 and 80:
p where L is the orbital momentum o
- Page 81 and 82:
about 70°' of the ne utrons . Afte
- Page 83 and 84:
We consider an isolated system of n
- Page 85 and 86:
on their spins . We find that if we
- Page 87 and 88:
device : scalers, which record the
- Page 89 and 90:
In appearance, semiconductor partic
- Page 91 and 92:
Usually, photons passing through a
- Page 93 and 94:
during this short time, worthwhile
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER NINE: THE ACCELERATION OF P
- Page 97 and 98:
1931 Sloan and Lawrence built a thi
- Page 99 and 100:
faster than light . instead, the ph
- Page 101 and 102:
employed for each function . In act
- Page 103 and 104:
and again by Budker and Veksler in
- Page 105 and 106:
BIBLIOGRAPHY .General works :The Ph
- Page 107 and 108:
Scalar : .esons may ihplain by the
- Page 109 and 110:
Name S J I I s U P GY ND ND 1 ND ND
- Page 111 and 112:
p5,55' 77 6570p 070601,.635 67.7355
- Page 113 and 114:
A .3 Quark combinations to fora sta
- Page 115 and 116:
s+ki # 13 .41M.V I9mo. dxry nvla)33
- Page 117 and 118:
k.1515e.pr rim
- Page 119 and 120:
° Prix.-.,a..u(14751 o IMfon.ly ca
- Page 121 and 122:
A .5 Conservation and invariance la
- Page 123 and 124:
F_AG Fixed field alternating gradie
- Page 125 and 126:
S Scalar gamma matrix product .S En
- Page 127 and 128:
Elastic cross—section .Inelastic
- Page 129 and 130:
C .3 Compound SI units used in this
- Page 131 and 132:
w oE >< k)- c; ev--o ;,o»,--.@r«-
- Page 133:
APPENDIX F : PHYSICAL CONSTANTS .(F