have strangeness of opposite sign, so as to mace their total strangeness zero, and t oallow such reactions a sp-err-.fl+K° .They also postulated that in the weak decays of these so-called 'strange' <strong>particles</strong> ,strangeness is not conserved, thus inhibiting and slowing down the decays . It is anexperimental fact that the difference between the initial and final strangeness ofweakly interacting system is ± 1 . This type of rule is known as a 'partial' conservatio nlaw .We say that a group of <strong>particles</strong> of roughly the same mass is a multiplet . P•;ember sof the same multiplet are denoted by the same Greek letter, upper-case for baryon sand lower-case for mesons . Let us consider the average charges, Q, or centres o fcharge, of these multiplets . If we double the values of the average charges, we obtai na useful quantum number known as hypercharge, Y . The average charge of the nucleo nmultiplet is ;., but that of, for example, the n is O . Thus we say that the n i sdisplaced from the normal by -'> units . Let us call this displacement A . We find tha tA= . z and A, . -1 . For mesons, we say that the normal is the average charge of th epion multiplet, which is zero . Thus, ;iK z . If we double all our values for A, w efind that we have no other quantum number than strangeness, and so we see tha tstrangeness is given by:S = Y B .We might also have achieved this results by consider reactions which do and do no ttake place . For example, since the reactionp4 p'-a p+p+ K °does not take place, and we arbitrarily assign 3 .0 for the nucleons, we may say thatthe K° has nonzero strangeness .Soon after the discovery of the strong nuclear force, which is charge independent ,W.Heisenberg suggested the idea that the proton and neutron are simply differentfacets of the same particle, the ' nucleon' . He realised that, so far as the stronginteraction was concerned, they did behave in exactly the same way . An analogou ssystem to that of <strong>subatomic</strong> <strong>particles</strong> is to be found in atomic spectra . A givenspectral line depends upon the orbital quantum number, 1, and the magnetic quantu mnumber, m . We find that m aan take any integral value between -1 and 1 . When no magneti cfield is applied to the atom in question, spectral lines corresponding to differen tvalues of m have the same energy, and are said to be degenerate . However, if a weakmagnetic field is applied to the atom, spectral lines with different values of mform small groups called multiplets . This term has been borrowed by particle <strong>physics</strong> .If similarly, we could 'turn off' all electric charge in the universe, then, jus tlike spectral lines with differing values of m, the proton and neutron would appea ridentical .Heisenberg suggested the assignment of a new quantum number to each multi pl et ,which could, like ordinary spin, be projected according to the charge of a give nparticle . HP argued that if we are to call the proton and neutron truly differen t<strong>particles</strong> because of their difference in charge, then we should also call proton swith spins of different <strong>particles</strong> from those with spins of 4 . He denoted theproton by the vector (1` and the neutron by the vector (0) . Using the Paul i0 1matrices, which are defined2,4 (0 1 0 -i1 0) ,26 s' (i 0) , 263410 -1,a
he built up a new algebra . We see, for example, that 2d,p . n, and vice versa. Heisenbergsuggested that the Pauli matrices might be considered as geometrical transformationsacting upon the vectors of the nucleons in i- or charge space, althoug hhe did not attempt to attach any physical significance to this concept . He name th enew quantum number isospin . This is abbreviated from isotopic spin, which is in fac ta misnomer, since members of the same isotopic multi plet do not have the same charge .There is a movement, especially in France and Switzerland, to rename it isobaric spin .The number of <strong>particles</strong> in a given multiplet is known as the multiplicity, L, of thatmultiplet. Heisenberg realised that, if a different projection were to be given t oeach different charge state in a multiplet, then isospin would have to be definedI = (PI-1)/2 .Due to the work of a British physicist, Kremmer, who devised n-dimensional equivalentsof the Pauli matrices, isospin, is now defined for every hadron . The first componentof isospin, I1 , is defined by1 1 =26,v ,where V is the vector, in charge space, of the particle in question . The vectors, of ,for example, the pion triplet are given a sTr 4; 7 '1 (0 .Similarly, the second component, 1 2, is given byIa , 26zv ,and so on . The third component, I 3, is the 'projected' component. By analogy with thereal spin components, J,,, Jy , and Ji , the third component of isospin is sometime srepresented as I, . By studying the third Pauli matrix, we obtain the resul t= I 3 + (3+ 3)/ 2 .It has been found that isospin is conserved in strong interactions only, and its thirdcomponent in strong and electromagnetic interactions . We might have guessed this , ''since isospin is charge independent like the strong interaction, and I 3 is, like th eelectromagnetic interaction, concerned with charges .Let us now consider some of the predictions of the Strangeness Scheme, which wa ssuggested by Gell-]ann and Nishijima around 1952 . They realised that when the law ofthe conservation of isospin is broken in a decay, then that decay will be much slowe rthan an eeuivalent one in which it is not . They noticed that the electromagneti cdecay mod e---> I~ + Ywas open to the °particle, but not to any of the other members of its triplet . Thu sthey predicted a lifetime of about 10-4' s, which is typical of an electromagneticallydecayingparticle. This estimate has been slightly improved lately, but no direc texperimental values have been obtained for the Z °lifetime . Cell-Kann and Nishijim aknew that the process.,,A''+,r -was a weak one, and that therefore IASI , 1, yielding a value of 0 or -2 for th estrangeness of the . multiplet . If S_ , 0, then one would expect the deca y_--. .. air -to be dominant, because it has ( P SI e 0, but it has been found not even to occur .Thus we are forced to conclude that S- -2, and that therfore I_ , so that a 2 °particle must exist . Such a particle was found at the Lawrence Radiation Laborator yin 1958 . Let us now discuss the kaons . We know that the process
- Page 1 and 2: ~~N ."$ II itOL'it At .AQo
- Page 3: CONTENT S .Chapter OneThe Early His
- Page 9 and 10: nA and n e are substituted in the f
- Page 11 and 12: CHAPTER TWO : SORE BASIC PRINCIPLES
- Page 13 and 14: Let us now consider the evidence fo
- Page 15 and 16: the light they emit . Heisenberg kn
- Page 17 and 18: Beats are heard of frequency v . If
- Page 19 and 20: CHAPTER THREE : THE EXCLUSION PRINC
- Page 21 and 22: order to have the radius of curvatu
- Page 23 and 24: had been definitely recorded .Let u
- Page 25 and 26: were looking for, experimenters set
- Page 27 and 28: CHAPTER FOUR : THE 'PROLIFERATION O
- Page 29 and 30: about 9 .5 x 10-u s . A few years l
- Page 31: 1953, by seeing what, if any, polar
- Page 35 and 36: lambda particles are preferentially
- Page 37 and 38: Homestake gold mine in South Dakota
- Page 39 and 40: so that 907(, of the pions were abe
- Page 41 and 42: postulates that any particle exist
- Page 43 and 44: type of particles which decay in th
- Page 45 and 46: A large number of n -N resonances h
- Page 47 and 48: was discovered in the course of the
- Page 49 and 50: where s and t are the riandelstam v
- Page 51 and 52: any single energy, both the s- and
- Page 53 and 54: CHAPTER SIX : SYMMETRY AND STRUCTUR
- Page 55 and 56: is 1 .3 x 10 s . The leaders o; is,
- Page 57 and 58: called 'parallelogram rule' of Matt
- Page 59 and 60: Let us now consider the quarks or a
- Page 61 and 62: in the first reaction are due to it
- Page 63 and 64: charge of the nucleon cloud is slig
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER SEVEN : INTERACTIONS .Physi
- Page 67 and 68: of an electromagnetic decay need no
- Page 69 and 70: Different scattering graphs caused
- Page 71 and 72: of radius about 3 x 10 -" m, which
- Page 73 and 74: that the beta decay process of the
- Page 75 and 76: photon, .4•*l, and for the antiph
- Page 77 and 78: should expect some asymmetry in the
- Page 79 and 80: p where L is the orbital momentum o
- Page 81 and 82: about 70°' of the ne utrons . Afte
- Page 83 and 84:
We consider an isolated system of n
- Page 85 and 86:
on their spins . We find that if we
- Page 87 and 88:
device : scalers, which record the
- Page 89 and 90:
In appearance, semiconductor partic
- Page 91 and 92:
Usually, photons passing through a
- Page 93 and 94:
during this short time, worthwhile
- Page 95 and 96:
CHAPTER NINE: THE ACCELERATION OF P
- Page 97 and 98:
1931 Sloan and Lawrence built a thi
- Page 99 and 100:
faster than light . instead, the ph
- Page 101 and 102:
employed for each function . In act
- Page 103 and 104:
and again by Budker and Veksler in
- Page 105 and 106:
BIBLIOGRAPHY .General works :The Ph
- Page 107 and 108:
Scalar : .esons may ihplain by the
- Page 109 and 110:
Name S J I I s U P GY ND ND 1 ND ND
- Page 111 and 112:
p5,55' 77 6570p 070601,.635 67.7355
- Page 113 and 114:
A .3 Quark combinations to fora sta
- Page 115 and 116:
s+ki # 13 .41M.V I9mo. dxry nvla)33
- Page 117 and 118:
k.1515e.pr rim
- Page 119 and 120:
° Prix.-.,a..u(14751 o IMfon.ly ca
- Page 121 and 122:
A .5 Conservation and invariance la
- Page 123 and 124:
F_AG Fixed field alternating gradie
- Page 125 and 126:
S Scalar gamma matrix product .S En
- Page 127 and 128:
Elastic cross—section .Inelastic
- Page 129 and 130:
C .3 Compound SI units used in this
- Page 131 and 132:
w oE >< k)- c; ev--o ;,o»,--.@r«-
- Page 133:
APPENDIX F : PHYSICAL CONSTANTS .(F