(3) value added to the product in the United States;(4) employment levels;(5) quantity and type of parts sourced in the United States; and(6) any other costs and activities in the United States directly leading to production ofthe like product. 23No single factor is determinative and the Commission may consider any other factors it deems relevantin light of the specific facts of any investigation. 24 The Commission has also rejected the notion that adomestic producer must demonstrate a certain minimum amount of U.S. consumption to be considered a“producer.” 25In the original investigation, the Commission defined the domestic industry as PMC, the soledomestic producer of saccharin. 26 Although not a party to this five-year review, *** submitted a written23See, e.g., Brake Rotors <strong>from</strong> <strong>China</strong>, Inv. No. 731-TA-744 (Second Review), <strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 4009 (June 2008) at8, n. 39.24See, e.g., Pure and Alloy Magnesium <strong>from</strong> Canada and Pure Magnesium <strong>from</strong> <strong>China</strong>, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-309-A-B and 731-TA-696 (Second Review), <strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 3859 (July 2006) at 14, 44 (not finding diecasters to be“producers”); Internal Combustion Industrial Forklift Trucks <strong>from</strong> Japan, Inv. No. T31-TA-377 (Second Review),<strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 3831 (December 2005) at 10-14; Sebacic Acid <strong>from</strong> <strong>China</strong>, Inv. No. 731-TA-653 (Second Review),<strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 3775 (May 2005) at 12-14; Aramid Fiber Formed of Poly Par-Phenylene Terepthalamide <strong>from</strong> theNetherlands, Inv. No. 731-TA-652 (Review), <strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 3394 (February 2001); Certain Cut-to-Length Steel Plate<strong>from</strong> France, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and Korea, Inv. Nos. 701-TA-387-391, 731-TA-816-821 (Final), <strong>USITC</strong>Pub. 3273 at 9 (January 2000). See also Large Newspaper Printing Presses <strong>from</strong> Germany and Japan, Inv. Nos. 731-TA-736-737 (Final) <strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 2988 at 7-8 (August 1996). Commission practice has not clearly established aspecific level of U.S. value added, or product finished value, required to qualify as a domestic producer; AramidFiber Formed of Poly Para-Phenylene Terephthalamide <strong>from</strong> the Netherlands, Inv. No. 731-TA-652 (Final), <strong>USITC</strong>Pub. 2783 at I-8-I-9 & n.34 (June 1994) (“no single factor -- including value added -- is determinative and . . . valueadded information becomes more meaningful when other production activity indicia are taken into account”); LowFuming Brazing Copper Wire and Rod <strong>from</strong> New Zealand, Inv. No. 731-TA-246 (Final), <strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 1779(November 1985) (the Commission concluded that 20 percent value added by flux coaters was sufficient); LowFuming Brazing Copper Wire and Rod <strong>from</strong> South Africa, Inv. No. 731-TA-246 (Final), <strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 1790 (January1986) (value added in the United States was 10 to 20 percent).The Commission has also stated that a “modest percentage of domestically sourced parts or raw materials asa percentage of cost does not necessarily mean that a firm is not a domestic producer.” Certain All Terrain Vehicles<strong>from</strong> Japan, Inv. No. 731-TA-388 (Final), <strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 2163 (March 1989) at 13-14. Conversely, the Commissionhas decided not to include a firm in the domestic industry where its operations contributed only a “minor percentageof the total value” of the product. Certain Radio Paging and Alerting Devices <strong>from</strong> Japan, Inv. No. 731-TA-102(Final), <strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 1410 (August 1983) (operations involved assembly and soldering of foreign sourced partsinvolving little technical skill). See also, Color Television Receivers <strong>from</strong> the Republic of Korea and Taiwan, Inv.Nos. 731-TA-134 and 135 (Final), <strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 1514 (April 1984) at 7-8 (Commission emphasized for the first timethat no single factor--including value added--is determinative).25See Brake Rotors <strong>from</strong> <strong>China</strong>, Inv. No. 731-TA-744 (Second Review), <strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 4009 (June 2008) at 8, n.39 (“[T]he statute does not set any minimum benchmark on how much domestic consumption must be supplied by aU.S. producer before such a producer may be considered a part of an ‘industry.’ Indeed, the statute contemplates, incertain circumstances, through its material retardation of the establishment of an industry provision, that there maybe no current production, yet an industry may be found to exist.”).26<strong>USITC</strong> Pub. 3606 at 10. In the original investigation, no party raised the issue of whether PMC was engaged insufficient production-related activities to qualify as a domestic producer of saccharin.6
statement challenging PMC’s status as a domestic producer of saccharin. 27 In its final comments, PMCdisputes *** assertions and claims that it qualifies as a domestic producer of saccharin. 28Two production processes are currently in use worldwide to produce saccharin: the Maumeeprocess, a continuous-production method that was developed in the United States and that has been useddomestically during the review period, and the older Remsen-Fahlberg process, a batch-productionmethod using different starting materials, which is the predominant method used worldwide. 29 Untilmid-2006, PMC used the continuous Maumee process at its sole production facility located inCincinnati, Ohio. 30 As discussed below, PMC modified its production process for saccharin and nolonger uses the continuous Maumee process; instead, PMC’s new process for producing saccharininvolves mostly post-Maumee refining and is currently being done on a batch (not continuous) basis. 31According to PMC, the important advantages of the Maumee process (relative to the Remsen-Fahlberg process) include the following: ***. 32Prior to mid-2006, the Maumee process used by PMC used methyl anthranilate (MA) and sulfurdioxide as key raw materials. In mid-2006, PMC modified its Maumee production process forsaccharin; according to PMC, this reengineering was intended to avoid using or producing certainhazardous chemicals (e.g., chlorine, sulfur dioxide, and ammonia), and therefore to make its saccharinproduction process safer and more environmentally friendly. 33 According to PMC, this process alsoallows it to manufacture saccharin more efficiently and more cost-effectively. 34 PMC states that its newMaumee process converts *** into saccharin, and that *** 35 *** 36 PMC worked in conjunction with*** 37 and in 2008, *** 38Based on the aforementioned six-factor test we generally consider in assessing whether a firmengages in sufficient production-related activities in the United States to be considered a domesticproducer, we find that PMC qualifies as a domestic producer, although the issue is close.Capital investment. PMC’s capital expenditures were relatively low in this five-year review,increasing <strong>from</strong> *** in 2003 to $*** in 2008. 39 Nevertheless, PMC’s total capital expenditures duringthe five-year review period were approximately $*** below its total capital expenditures during theoriginal three-year period of investigation. 40 PMC also had *** capital expenditures in 2003, 2006, and27*** Statement at 8-13.28See e.g., PMC Final Comments at 4-5 n.1.29CR at I-14; PR at I-10.30CR at I-15; PR at I-11.31Both the Maumee continuous process and the Remsen-Fahlberg process are used in <strong>China</strong>. CR at I-14.32CR at I-14; PR at I-10.33PMC Prehearing Br. at 14.34See e.g., PMC Posthearing Br, Exh.1 at 34-35.35CR at I-15; PR at I-11.36PMC Final Comments at 4-5 n.1.37CR at I-15; PR at I-11.38CR at I-15; PR at I-11.39PMC’s capital expenditures increased <strong>from</strong> *** in 2003 to *** in 2004 to *** in 2005, fell to *** in 2006 and2007, and then increased to *** in 2008. CR/PR at Table C-1. In the original investigation, PMC’s capitalexpenditures declined substantially during the period, falling <strong>from</strong> *** in 2000 to *** in 2002. Original CR/PR atTable VI-4.40CR/PR at Table C-1; Original CR/PR at Table VI-4.7
- Page 1 and 2: Saccharin from ChinaInvestigation N
- Page 3: U.S. International Trade Commission
- Page 6 and 7: CONTENTSPagePart III: Condition of
- Page 9 and 10: VIEWS OF THE COMMISSIONBased on the
- Page 11: mouthwash. 14 By weight, it is abou
- Page 15 and 16: Quantity and Type of Parts Sourced
- Page 17 and 18: IV.LIKELIHOOD OF CONTINUATION OR RE
- Page 19 and 20: B. Conditions of Competition and th
- Page 21 and 22: . Supply in the U.S. MarketAs in th
- Page 23 and 24: In the original determination, the
- Page 25 and 26: significant volumes of saccharin to
- Page 27 and 28: the domestic like product. 160 All
- Page 29: period, increasing from *** percent
- Page 32 and 33: injured or likely to be injured by
- Page 34 and 35: Table I-1--ContinuedSaccharin: Summ
- Page 36 and 37: Table I-2Saccharin: Administrative
- Page 38 and 39: U.S. Tariff TreatmentImports of thi
- Page 40 and 41: and monkeys, evidence strongly supp
- Page 42 and 43: Channels of DistributionDuring the
- Page 44 and 45: Table I-8Saccharin: U.S. shipments
- Page 46 and 47: PMC sells saccharin ***, while mark
- Page 48 and 49: The combined quantity of purchases
- Page 50 and 51: Table II-5Saccharin: Interchangeabi
- Page 52 and 53: adjusting supply in response to pri
- Page 54 and 55: Changes in Character of Operations
- Page 56 and 57: PMC further described its reenginee
- Page 58 and 59: 2008, both of these forms of saccha
- Page 61 and 62: PART IV: U.S. IMPORTS, THE INDUSTRY
- Page 63 and 64:
Table IV-2Saccharin: U.S. importers
- Page 65 and 66:
The capacity, production, exports,
- Page 67 and 68:
In order to protect the sugar indus
- Page 69 and 70:
Table IV-7Saccharin: Global exports
- Page 71 and 72:
Trade BalancesTable IV-9 contains G
- Page 73:
Information concerning exports of s
- Page 76 and 77:
Figure V-1Exchange rates: Index of
- Page 78 and 79:
Table V-3Saccharin: Weighted-averag
- Page 81 and 82:
31504 Federal Register / Vol. 73, N
- Page 83 and 84:
31506 Federal Register / Vol. 73, N
- Page 85 and 86:
59604 Federal Register / Vol. 73, N
- Page 87 and 88:
wilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES72
- Page 89:
APPENDIX BCALENDAR OF PUBLIC HEARIN
- Page 92 and 93:
In Opposition to Continuation of th
- Page 95:
Table C-1Saccharin: Summary data co
- Page 99 and 100:
U.S. PRODUCERS COMMENTSThe Commissi
- Page 101 and 102:
***“***.”***“No.”***“No.
- Page 103 and 104:
DOC/ITC regulations. Their own prod
- Page 105 and 106:
***“*** could lower inventories b
- Page 107 and 108:
***“*** cannot comment on this, n
- Page 109:
The Commission requested foreign pr