Saccharin from China - USITC

period, increasing from *** percent in 2007 to *** percent in 2008. 180 Non-subject imports from Korea,which was the largest source of non-subject imports during the review period, actually declined from3.4 million pounds in 2004 to 2.6 million pounds in 2008. 181 182 Moreover, the average unit values(“AUVs”) of non-subject imports were higher than the AUVs for subject imports in 2007 and 2008,indicating that subject imports would likely be priced more aggressively than non-subject imports if theorder were revoked. 183 We therefore find that subject imports are likely to have a significant adverseimpact upon the domestic industry if the order were revoked notwithstanding the growing presence ofnon-subject imports in the U.S. market.CONCLUSIONFor the reasons stated above, we determine that revocation of the antidumping duty order onsubject imports from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury tothe domestic industry within a reasonably foreseeable time.180CR/PR at Table C-1.181PMC Posthearing Br., Exh. 1 at 45.182See, e.g., Hearing Tr. at 137 (Delaney) (“My opinion is that, especially the Koreans, they look at the U.S.market and if the antidumping order is revoked, then prices are going to come down substantially and they may nothave a business anymore. They may not be able to enter – the Koreans may be out of this market.”).183CR/PR at Table IV-1.23