Handbook on Citizen Engagement: Beyond Consultation - SASANet

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Endnotes123456789101112131415161718This literature was compiled into a bibliography entitled, A Learning Guide to PublicInvolvement in Canada by Mary Pat MacKinnon, Sonia Pitre and Judy Watling. CPRN, Feb.2007. It is available at www.cprn.org/doc.cfm?doc=1622&l=en.See Acknowledgements at beginning of document for a list of key informants.MacKinnon, Mary Pat. 2003. Citizens’ Dialogue on Canada’s Future: A 21st Century SocialContract. Presentation to the Canadian Centre for Management Development, Ottawa:Canadian Policy Research Networks, September 26, 2003.Yankelovich, Daniel. 1991. Coming to Public Judgment. University of Syracuse Press, NY.This definition of Public Participation is in clear contrast to that put forward earlier in thischapter and is reflective of the evolving nature of this field.Elections Canada, Report of the Chief Electoral Officer of Canada on the 38th GeneralElection Held on June 28, 2004. Available at www.elections.ca/content.asp?section=gen&dir=rep/re2&document=index&lang=e&textonly=false.EKOS Research Associates. Citizen Engagement 2005: Government Performance and PublicPreferences. Part of Rethinking Citizen Engagement Study, Ottawa: EKOS, 2005.Phillips, Susan D., Michael Orsini. Mapping the Links: Citizen Involvement in PolicyProcesses. Canadian Policy Research Networks, 2002.“Wicked” is a term recently adopted by policy circles, used to describe complex societalissues without a clear “right” answer, often involving a moral positioning.Ibid., and Lukensmeyer, Carolyn J. and Lars Hasselblad Torres. 2006. Public Deliberation: AManager’s Guide to Citizen Engagement. The IBM Center for The Business of Government.Turnbull, Lori, Peter Aucoin. Fostering Canadians’ Role in Public Policy: A Strategy forInstitutionalizing Public Involvement in Policy. CPRN, March 2006. Available atwww.cprn.org/doc.cfm?doc=1404&l=en.Ibid.Public involvement in this document by Turnbull and Aucoin is defined similarly to theworking definition of citizen engagement in this handbook.To read the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding this case, go tohttp://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1990/1990rcs1-1075/1990rcs1-1075.html.To read the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding this case, go tohttp://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc73/2004scc73.html.To read the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada regarding this case, go tohttp://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2004/2004scc74/2004scc74.html.For a copy of the full Land Use Plan entitled, Shxunutun’s Tu Suleluxwtst: In the footsteps ofour Ancestors and a copy of the Consultation Policy, visit www.hulquminum.bc.ca/our_work/projects.The Government of Saskatchewan Guidelines for Consultation with First Nations and MétisPeople: A Guide for Decision Makers. Saskatchewan First Nations and Métis RelationsDepartment, May 2006, page 4. Available at www.fnmr.gov.sk.ca/.46 CANADIAN POLICY RESEARCH NETWORKS
1920212223242526272829303132333435363738The Government of Saskatchewan Guidelines for Consultation with First Nations and MétisPeople: A Guide for Decision Makers. Saskatchewan First Nations and Métis RelationsDepartment, May 2006, page 2. Available at www.fnmr.gov.sk.ca/.Phillips, Susan D., and Michael Orsini. 2002. Mapping the Links: Citizen Involvement inPolicy Processes. Canadian Policy Research Networks. www.cprn.org/doc.cfm?doc=169&l=en.Gauvin, Francois-Pierre and Julia Abelson. 2006. Primer on Public Involvement. Toronto:Health Council of Canada.www.healthcouncilcanada.ca/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=109&Itemid=108.Adapted from Questions provided by Vancouver Coastal Health – internal document.Adapted from Questions provided by Vancouver Coastal Health – internal document.Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public Involvement in Decision-making. 2000: 20.Having an “impartial” facilitator versus an “insider” as facilitator is the subject of somedebate and is further addressed in Chapter VII, section II, 8. Facilitators/moderators.Environment Canada website. July 18th, 2007. www.ec.gc.ca/CEPARegistry/participation/.Coleman, Stephen and John Gotze. Bowling Together: Online Public Engagement in PolicyDeliberation. Hansard Society. www.bowlingtogether.net/references.html.Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public Involvement in Decision-making. 2000: 20.Pruitt, Bettye and Philip Thomas. 2007. Democratic Dialogue – A <strong>Handbook</strong> forPractitioners. Canadian International Development Agency, IDEA, UNDP and GS/OAS.www.idea.int/publications/democratic_dialogue/index.cfm.Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public Involvement in Decision-making 2000: 20.Some of these questions are drawn directly from Vancouver Coastal Health’s Checklist forCitizen Engagement Team, an internal document.Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public Involvement in Decision-making 2000: 20.Available at www.vch.ca/ce.Available at www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/care/romanow/index1.html.Maxwell, Judith, Steven Rosell, Pierre-Gerlier Forest. Giving Citizens a Voice in HealthcarePolicy in Canada. British Medical Journal May 10, 2003. Vol. 326, p. 1,031-33. Available atwww.cprn.org/doc.cfm?doc=292&l=en.Ibid.Report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources Development and the Status ofPersons with Disabilities. Listening to Canadians: A First View of the Future of the CanadaPension Plan (Disability) Program. June 2003. Available at www.parl.gc.ca/cppd/index_e.asp?Language=E.Ibid. Chapter 1, p. 7.CANADIAN POLICY RESEARCH NETWORKS 47
Page 1: Handbook on Citize
Page 4 and 5: Chapter VIII. Case Examples .......
Page 6 and 7: Other sectors (non-profit, private,
Page 8 and 9: Chapter II. What Is Citizen Engagem
Page 10 and 11: and actions. It sees dialogue as mo
Page 12 and 13: Figure 1. VCH Community Engagement
Page 14 and 15: ) The hopes and fears of citizen en
Page 16 and 17: Chapter IV. Institutionalizing Citi
Page 18 and 19: Chapter V. Engaging Members of Spec
Page 20 and 21: Table 5. Barriers to Participation
Page 22 and 23: Chapter VI. Engaging Aboriginal Com
Page 24 and 25: For further reading:Government of S
Page 26 and 27: 2. Assessing citizen engagement req
Page 28 and 29: For further reading:Involve, a UK-b
Page 30 and 31: For further reading:Vancouver Coast
Page 32 and 33: Who will be making decisions regard
Page 34 and 35: Appendix 1 provides one page summar
Page 36 and 37: Visit Ascentum’s website “dialo
Page 38 and 39: For a great section on monitoring a
Page 40 and 41: Information to provide participants
Page 42 and 43: Chapter VIII. Case ExamplesThe foll
Page 44 and 45: The success of these dialogues is c
Page 46 and 47: The Tenant Participation System has
Page 48 and 49: Chapter IX. Practical TipsHere are
Page 52 and 53: 3940414243Most information regardin
Page 54 and 55: Appendix A. An Overview of Public P

Handbook on Citizen Engagement: Beyond Consultation - SASANet

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?