Equal Opportunity in the Fort Wayne Community Schools: A ...
Equal Opportunity in the Fort Wayne Community Schools: A ...
Equal Opportunity in the Fort Wayne Community Schools: A ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
facilities, lack of comparability <strong>in</strong> teacher recruitment,and different grade plans for predom<strong>in</strong>antlywhite and predom<strong>in</strong>antly black schools. Review of1973-74 enrollment data found that 5 elementaryschools had m<strong>in</strong>ority enrollments above 90 percent,4 o<strong>the</strong>rs were more than 50 percent m<strong>in</strong>ority,and 19 had less than 3 percent m<strong>in</strong>ority students.More than 73 percent of <strong>the</strong> district'sm<strong>in</strong>ority students were <strong>in</strong> schools with m<strong>in</strong>orityenrollments of 50 percent or more. In 1971, 39 of66 black elementary school teachers were <strong>in</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eschools with over 50 percent black enrollment.Seventeen elementary schools had no m<strong>in</strong>orityteachers, and 7 of <strong>the</strong>se had a m<strong>in</strong>ority enrollmentof less than 3 percent. A similar pattern was foundfor <strong>the</strong> 1973-74 academic year with respect toteacher assignments. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to HEW, byFebruary 1975 student racial imbalances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> juniorand senior high schools were substantiallyreduced. Improvements were reportedly also made<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grade plan used <strong>in</strong> predom<strong>in</strong>antly blackschools. 4In 1975, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of Brown v. We<strong>in</strong>berger*HEW was sued for: (1) failure to <strong>in</strong>itiate <strong>in</strong>vestigationsof discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> school districts where racialimbalances gave cause to believe that certa<strong>in</strong>districts were violat<strong>in</strong>g Title VI; (2) failure to actexpeditiously <strong>in</strong> complet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigations of allegedTitle VI violations that <strong>the</strong> Department had<strong>in</strong>itiated; (3) failure to commence enforcementproceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> cases where violations werefound and voluntary compliance had not beenreached; and (4) failure to commence enforcementproceed<strong>in</strong>gs aga<strong>in</strong>st schools determ<strong>in</strong>ed byHEW to be <strong>in</strong>eligible for Emergency School AidAct (ESAA) funds because <strong>the</strong>y were practic<strong>in</strong>gsegregation and discrim<strong>in</strong>ation. <strong>Fort</strong>y-six schooldistricts, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 15 <strong>in</strong> Region V, were <strong>in</strong>cluded.The <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Schools</strong> was one of<strong>the</strong> districts, found to be <strong>in</strong> violation of Title VIby HEW, <strong>in</strong> which voluntary compliance had notbeen achieved and where enforcement proceed<strong>in</strong>gshad not been <strong>in</strong>itiated. In July 1976, United StatesDistrict Court Judge John J. Sirica ordered HEW,with<strong>in</strong> 60 days, ei<strong>the</strong>r to commence enforcementproceed<strong>in</strong>gs aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> or to make an adm<strong>in</strong>istrativedeterm<strong>in</strong>ation that <strong>the</strong> district was <strong>in</strong>compliance.A conference was held <strong>in</strong> Cleveland betweenAugust 13 and 15, 1975, to discuss <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n pend<strong>in</strong>gBrown case. Among those attend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> conferencewere Mart<strong>in</strong> Gerry (Act<strong>in</strong>g Director,OCR), Kenneth M<strong>in</strong>es (Region V Director, OCR),and Orrie Barr (Region V Education BranchChief, OCR <strong>in</strong> Cleveland). At that conference adecision was made to drop <strong>the</strong> student assignmentissue and to pursue <strong>the</strong> teacher assignment issue.The decision to drop <strong>the</strong> student issue was made<strong>in</strong> part because <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> had reduced racial imbalancesat <strong>the</strong> junior high school level, 6 accord<strong>in</strong>gto HEW documents. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Kenneth M<strong>in</strong>es,it was determ<strong>in</strong>ed at <strong>the</strong> Cleveland conference that<strong>the</strong> evidence was <strong>in</strong>sufficient to support a Title VIviolation. 7Subsequent reviews of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> schoolsituation, and of <strong>the</strong> situation <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r schools <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Brown decision, call <strong>in</strong>to questionOCR's handl<strong>in</strong>g of its <strong>in</strong>vestigation. FrankKrueger, attorney with <strong>the</strong> HEW Office of GeneralCounsel (OGC), who negotiated <strong>the</strong> teacher assignmentissue with <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong>, said <strong>in</strong> March1977 he believed at that time, and still believes,that <strong>the</strong>re is a student assignment case whichcould be made. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Krueger, <strong>the</strong> juniorhigh school reorganization did not resolve <strong>the</strong>issue satisfactorily. When <strong>the</strong> <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> case wasreferred to Krueger, however, it was simply ateacher assignment case. Krueger said that accord<strong>in</strong>gto his recollection of <strong>the</strong> situation, student assignmentpatterns constituted a Title VI violationandthat he could probably conv<strong>in</strong>ce OCR to <strong>in</strong>itiateadm<strong>in</strong>istrative proceed<strong>in</strong>gs if he had <strong>the</strong> timeto review <strong>the</strong> situation. 8William L. Taylor, director of <strong>the</strong> Center forNational Policy Review and attorney for <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Brown case, also believes <strong>the</strong>re may stillbe a Title VI violation based on student assignment.(See appendix B for a summary of <strong>the</strong>center's assessment of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> situation.)Taylor also expressed concern about <strong>the</strong> fact that<strong>the</strong>re is no written record <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g why <strong>the</strong> studentissue <strong>in</strong> <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> and <strong>in</strong> several o<strong>the</strong>rBrown-related school systems was dropped. Accord<strong>in</strong>gto Taylor, <strong>the</strong>re is noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Brownfiles expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g why this issue was dropped. 9 Inresponse to a memo from Frederick T. Cioffi(Chief, Operations Branch, Office of <strong>the</strong> Secretary,HEW) to Orrie Barr, ask<strong>in</strong>g for documents thatwould expla<strong>in</strong> why <strong>the</strong> student assignment issuewas dropped, Cioffi was <strong>in</strong>formed that "no docu-3