12.07.2015 Views

Equal Opportunity in the Fort Wayne Community Schools: A ...

Equal Opportunity in the Fort Wayne Community Schools: A ...

Equal Opportunity in the Fort Wayne Community Schools: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

facilities, lack of comparability <strong>in</strong> teacher recruitment,and different grade plans for predom<strong>in</strong>antlywhite and predom<strong>in</strong>antly black schools. Review of1973-74 enrollment data found that 5 elementaryschools had m<strong>in</strong>ority enrollments above 90 percent,4 o<strong>the</strong>rs were more than 50 percent m<strong>in</strong>ority,and 19 had less than 3 percent m<strong>in</strong>ority students.More than 73 percent of <strong>the</strong> district'sm<strong>in</strong>ority students were <strong>in</strong> schools with m<strong>in</strong>orityenrollments of 50 percent or more. In 1971, 39 of66 black elementary school teachers were <strong>in</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eschools with over 50 percent black enrollment.Seventeen elementary schools had no m<strong>in</strong>orityteachers, and 7 of <strong>the</strong>se had a m<strong>in</strong>ority enrollmentof less than 3 percent. A similar pattern was foundfor <strong>the</strong> 1973-74 academic year with respect toteacher assignments. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to HEW, byFebruary 1975 student racial imbalances <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> juniorand senior high schools were substantiallyreduced. Improvements were reportedly also made<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grade plan used <strong>in</strong> predom<strong>in</strong>antly blackschools. 4In 1975, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of Brown v. We<strong>in</strong>berger*HEW was sued for: (1) failure to <strong>in</strong>itiate <strong>in</strong>vestigationsof discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> school districts where racialimbalances gave cause to believe that certa<strong>in</strong>districts were violat<strong>in</strong>g Title VI; (2) failure to actexpeditiously <strong>in</strong> complet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestigations of allegedTitle VI violations that <strong>the</strong> Department had<strong>in</strong>itiated; (3) failure to commence enforcementproceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> cases where violations werefound and voluntary compliance had not beenreached; and (4) failure to commence enforcementproceed<strong>in</strong>gs aga<strong>in</strong>st schools determ<strong>in</strong>ed byHEW to be <strong>in</strong>eligible for Emergency School AidAct (ESAA) funds because <strong>the</strong>y were practic<strong>in</strong>gsegregation and discrim<strong>in</strong>ation. <strong>Fort</strong>y-six schooldistricts, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 15 <strong>in</strong> Region V, were <strong>in</strong>cluded.The <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Schools</strong> was one of<strong>the</strong> districts, found to be <strong>in</strong> violation of Title VIby HEW, <strong>in</strong> which voluntary compliance had notbeen achieved and where enforcement proceed<strong>in</strong>gshad not been <strong>in</strong>itiated. In July 1976, United StatesDistrict Court Judge John J. Sirica ordered HEW,with<strong>in</strong> 60 days, ei<strong>the</strong>r to commence enforcementproceed<strong>in</strong>gs aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> or to make an adm<strong>in</strong>istrativedeterm<strong>in</strong>ation that <strong>the</strong> district was <strong>in</strong>compliance.A conference was held <strong>in</strong> Cleveland betweenAugust 13 and 15, 1975, to discuss <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>n pend<strong>in</strong>gBrown case. Among those attend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> conferencewere Mart<strong>in</strong> Gerry (Act<strong>in</strong>g Director,OCR), Kenneth M<strong>in</strong>es (Region V Director, OCR),and Orrie Barr (Region V Education BranchChief, OCR <strong>in</strong> Cleveland). At that conference adecision was made to drop <strong>the</strong> student assignmentissue and to pursue <strong>the</strong> teacher assignment issue.The decision to drop <strong>the</strong> student issue was made<strong>in</strong> part because <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> had reduced racial imbalancesat <strong>the</strong> junior high school level, 6 accord<strong>in</strong>gto HEW documents. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Kenneth M<strong>in</strong>es,it was determ<strong>in</strong>ed at <strong>the</strong> Cleveland conference that<strong>the</strong> evidence was <strong>in</strong>sufficient to support a Title VIviolation. 7Subsequent reviews of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> schoolsituation, and of <strong>the</strong> situation <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r schools <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Brown decision, call <strong>in</strong>to questionOCR's handl<strong>in</strong>g of its <strong>in</strong>vestigation. FrankKrueger, attorney with <strong>the</strong> HEW Office of GeneralCounsel (OGC), who negotiated <strong>the</strong> teacher assignmentissue with <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong>, said <strong>in</strong> March1977 he believed at that time, and still believes,that <strong>the</strong>re is a student assignment case whichcould be made. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Krueger, <strong>the</strong> juniorhigh school reorganization did not resolve <strong>the</strong>issue satisfactorily. When <strong>the</strong> <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> case wasreferred to Krueger, however, it was simply ateacher assignment case. Krueger said that accord<strong>in</strong>gto his recollection of <strong>the</strong> situation, student assignmentpatterns constituted a Title VI violationandthat he could probably conv<strong>in</strong>ce OCR to <strong>in</strong>itiateadm<strong>in</strong>istrative proceed<strong>in</strong>gs if he had <strong>the</strong> timeto review <strong>the</strong> situation. 8William L. Taylor, director of <strong>the</strong> Center forNational Policy Review and attorney for <strong>the</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Brown case, also believes <strong>the</strong>re may stillbe a Title VI violation based on student assignment.(See appendix B for a summary of <strong>the</strong>center's assessment of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> situation.)Taylor also expressed concern about <strong>the</strong> fact that<strong>the</strong>re is no written record <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g why <strong>the</strong> studentissue <strong>in</strong> <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Wayne</strong> and <strong>in</strong> several o<strong>the</strong>rBrown-related school systems was dropped. Accord<strong>in</strong>gto Taylor, <strong>the</strong>re is noth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Brownfiles expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g why this issue was dropped. 9 Inresponse to a memo from Frederick T. Cioffi(Chief, Operations Branch, Office of <strong>the</strong> Secretary,HEW) to Orrie Barr, ask<strong>in</strong>g for documents thatwould expla<strong>in</strong> why <strong>the</strong> student assignment issuewas dropped, Cioffi was <strong>in</strong>formed that "no docu-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!