12.07.2015 Views

Equal Opportunity in the Fort Wayne Community Schools: A ...

Equal Opportunity in the Fort Wayne Community Schools: A ...

Equal Opportunity in the Fort Wayne Community Schools: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tion for <strong>the</strong> Peabody evaluation (see note 2) andstated, "Several major components of this plan relateto <strong>the</strong> Peabody Study."The plan calls for grade reorganization, <strong>the</strong> clos<strong>in</strong>gof some schools and <strong>the</strong> construction of newfacilities, pupil reassignments, and o<strong>the</strong>r actions tomeet <strong>the</strong> objectives. Specifically, <strong>the</strong> plan calls forclos<strong>in</strong>g six elementary schools, five of which are <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> central city and four of which have m<strong>in</strong>orityenrollments of 75 percent or more. Thus 4 of <strong>the</strong>10 elementary schools with predom<strong>in</strong>antly m<strong>in</strong>orityenrollments would be closed. Two of <strong>the</strong> elementaryschools to be closed under this proposalwould be turned <strong>in</strong>to enrichment centers wherefourth- and fifth-grade students would spend 1week each semester for human relations tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gand preparation for later school years. Elementaryschools would conta<strong>in</strong> grades K-5, junior highschools would house grades 6-8, and senior highschools would serve grades 9-12. Students currentlyattend<strong>in</strong>g schools that would be elim<strong>in</strong>ated<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan would be transferred to schools immediatelyborder<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> central city. F<strong>in</strong>ally, a newhigh school would be built <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> predom<strong>in</strong>antlywhite, nor<strong>the</strong>astern portion of <strong>the</strong> school district.Grile's proposals have not met with unanimousapproval among board members, and muchsharper criticism has been directed aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong>plan by o<strong>the</strong>r members of <strong>the</strong> community. Boardmember Lorra<strong>in</strong>e Davis stated, "I want toemphasize this is a proposed plan. As far as <strong>the</strong>adm<strong>in</strong>istration is concerned this may be a s<strong>in</strong>gleunit plan, but as far as <strong>the</strong> community is concerned,and perhaps as far as <strong>the</strong> board is concernedit's not necessarily a unit plan." 18 FredMeriwe<strong>the</strong>r, one of two black board members said,"I'm not pleased with <strong>the</strong> plan as it presently exists.The comment I hear over and over aga<strong>in</strong> isthat it seems as if <strong>the</strong> onus is be<strong>in</strong>g put on <strong>the</strong>m<strong>in</strong>ority community aga<strong>in</strong>." 19 Board memberLeonard Goldste<strong>in</strong> claimed <strong>the</strong> commitment madeby <strong>the</strong> board on July 8, 1974, "to elim<strong>in</strong>ate racialsegregation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> entire school system," is diluted<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan. However, Goldste<strong>in</strong> said he found <strong>the</strong>plan "acceptable, but fall<strong>in</strong>g far short of what Ith<strong>in</strong>k is even a beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of what we want." 20The major criticism of <strong>the</strong> plan from o<strong>the</strong>r communitymembers revolves around <strong>the</strong> desegregationissue. It is reportedly argued, first, that <strong>the</strong>plan does not go far enough towards desegregat<strong>in</strong>g<strong>the</strong> schools and, secondly, that <strong>the</strong> burden isplaced entirely on <strong>the</strong> black community. Somecritics ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> that <strong>the</strong> extent of desegregationpredicted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan is less than that <strong>in</strong> any of <strong>the</strong>five plans recommended <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Peabody report. 21Former Mayor Ivan Lebamoff charged <strong>the</strong> planwas designed to barely meet legal pressures fordesegregation. 22 Grile's response to this l<strong>in</strong>e of argumentwas that <strong>the</strong> Peabody plans would notcompletely desegregate all <strong>the</strong> schools and that hisplan would result <strong>in</strong> 66 percent of all black studentsattend<strong>in</strong>g schools with a white majority andjust 33 percent attend<strong>in</strong>g majority black schools by1980. In addition, only 6 of <strong>the</strong> 38 elementaryschools would be predom<strong>in</strong>antly black by thattime. 23Nowhere <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan or <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> newspaper articlesobta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> Midwest Regional Office of <strong>the</strong>U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, however, doesGrile make any reference to <strong>the</strong> 10 percent to 30percent band cited <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Peabody report asprovid<strong>in</strong>g "optimum potential for mean<strong>in</strong>gfulm<strong>in</strong>ority-majority <strong>in</strong>teraction." One question thatrema<strong>in</strong>s unanswered is what percentage of <strong>the</strong>schools will be brought with<strong>in</strong> this band. Grilestated his plan would reduce <strong>the</strong> percentage ofblack students attend<strong>in</strong>g majority black schools to33 percent. This would represent a reduction ofapproximately 10 percent, s<strong>in</strong>ce 43 percent ofm<strong>in</strong>ority students were enrolled <strong>in</strong> predom<strong>in</strong>antlym<strong>in</strong>ority schools <strong>in</strong> 1975 (see table 1). As <strong>in</strong>dicatedabove, this is not considered enough bysome board members and o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> communi-ty-Harsher comments were directed at <strong>the</strong> planbecause it places <strong>the</strong> burden of desegregation on<strong>the</strong> black community. The fact that all bus<strong>in</strong>gwould be one way, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g bus<strong>in</strong>g of black studentsout of <strong>the</strong> central city, and that a new highschool would be built <strong>in</strong> a predom<strong>in</strong>antly whitearea while several schools <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> central city wouldbe closed were particularly sore po<strong>in</strong>ts. One blackmo<strong>the</strong>r said, "We have been go<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> whiteschools for a long time. It's time for you to cometo some of our schools." She went on to arguethat it would be just as easy to remodel <strong>the</strong> olderschools as to tear <strong>the</strong>m down. 24 Concerns werealso expressed about decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g property values <strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> central city once <strong>the</strong> schools were gone and<strong>the</strong> difficulty parents would have <strong>in</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g to PTA6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!