12.07.2015 Views

Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...

Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...

Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to a certain extent, because I was able to employ <strong>the</strong> techniques that I thoughtwere best at that particular time.Many evaluators were engaged in detailed meetings with programme managers andmembers <strong>of</strong> management teams in <strong>the</strong> early stages <strong>of</strong> evaluations and at regularintervals in order to develop sets <strong>of</strong> questions to be addressed, to agreemethodologies, timescales, <strong>the</strong>mes and elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> partnership to be evaluatedand a programme <strong>of</strong> feedback. Some evaluators appear to recognise <strong>the</strong> potentialsignificance and benefits <strong>of</strong> adopting a participative approach to evaluation (that is,responding to <strong>the</strong> views <strong>of</strong> service users in shaping <strong>the</strong>ir evaluation work), whilst alsoresponding to <strong>the</strong> articulated needs <strong>of</strong> those stakeholders managing <strong>the</strong> partnership(in particular programme managers and management teams). One Wave Onepartnership, for example, held an event that involved local young people who wereasked to raise questions <strong>the</strong>y would like to be addressed by <strong>the</strong> local evaluation.Chapter 2 <strong>of</strong> this report provides examples <strong>of</strong> participative approaches <strong>of</strong> some localevaluations.Responsiveness to changeThe majority <strong>of</strong> evaluation reports indicate that <strong>the</strong> aims and scope <strong>of</strong> evaluationswere defined in agreement with partnership members; most <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>the</strong> programmemanager and/or members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> management team. Many evaluations also stressed<strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> adopting a flexible approach enabling <strong>the</strong>m to respond to changingneeds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> partnership over time. This is seen as important in a rapidly changingnational and local policy environment (as noted in Section 1.2 above). Someevaluations emphasised <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> regular catch-up meetings with keyprogramme staff to ensure <strong>the</strong> ongoing relevance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation. O<strong>the</strong>revaluations adopted an integrated approach within partnership structures (such asbeing formal members <strong>of</strong> partnership sub-groups that focus on evaluation andlearning) that enabled <strong>the</strong>m to interactively engage with partnership stakeholders.One Wave One evaluator indicated that ideas about evaluation were shared througha number <strong>of</strong> networking events. Such ga<strong>the</strong>rings brought toge<strong>the</strong>r evaluation <strong>of</strong>ficers<strong>from</strong> initiatives such as Sure Start, Children’s Fund and Special Education projects t<strong>of</strong>orm a Monitoring and <strong>Evaluation</strong> Group that aims to combine approaches toevaluation consistently within <strong>the</strong> local authority area.14Chapter 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!