Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...
Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...
Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 4: Prevention, Participation and PartnershipWorking: Key Messages <strong>from</strong> Children’s Fund<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> Reports.This chapter reflects on a number <strong>of</strong> key messages presented within local evaluationreports and how <strong>the</strong>se relate to <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>mes driving <strong>the</strong> Children’s Fund programme,namely, prevention and preventative services, children and young people’sparticipation and partnership working. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ways local evaluators havesought to conceptualise prevention, participation and partnership working are alsohighlighted.4.1 Key Messages <strong>from</strong> <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong>: Prevention and Preventative <strong>Services</strong>The focus <strong>of</strong> local evaluators’ work on prevention has been to analyse <strong>the</strong> activities<strong>of</strong> Children’s Fund projects. Relatively few reports concentrate on <strong>the</strong> place <strong>of</strong>prevention and early intervention, o<strong>the</strong>r than in very broad policy terms, such as how<strong>the</strong> local prevention strategy relates to Children’s Fund planning. Hence, mostevaluations have sought to conceptualise prevention in relation to <strong>the</strong> Children’sFund sub-objectives, and/or to <strong>the</strong> outcomes framework in Every Child Matters in<strong>the</strong>ir assessments <strong>of</strong> projects’ progress. A number <strong>of</strong> evaluators also drew on <strong>the</strong>four ‘tiers’ <strong>of</strong> prevention (diversionary; early prevention; heavy end prevention; andrestorative prevention) adopted in <strong>the</strong> Children’s Fund Guidance based on <strong>the</strong> work<strong>of</strong> Hardiker, et al. (1991) as a frame <strong>of</strong> reference for locating <strong>the</strong> activities <strong>of</strong>Children’s Fund services.As noted above, measuring/demonstrating effective prevention was most widelyattempted through quantitative analysis <strong>of</strong> project monitoring/secondary statisticaldata sets and multiple methods in which service providers and service users’perspectives were elicited in order to attempt to show that preventative services hadhad a positive impact on service users’ circumstances and to identify <strong>the</strong> practices<strong>the</strong>y employed that were effective. There were many positive messages in localevaluation reports in relation to <strong>the</strong> beneficial impacts <strong>of</strong> Children’s Fund preventiveprojects. Illustrating <strong>the</strong> sorts <strong>of</strong> conclusions evaluations are reaching on preventativeactivities a report on a Wave One partnership summarises that:The children and young people who access services funded by <strong>the</strong> X Children’sFund are benefiting <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> support that is being provided. The Fund isreaching and supporting children and young people who are suffering socialexclusion, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m at high levels. Families are also benefiting <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>work <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> X Children’s Fund in ways that are helping to reduce <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong>poverty… The X Children’s Fund has actively supported innovative work whichpoints to new models <strong>of</strong> working with children and young people.Chapter 4 49