12.07.2015 Views

Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...

Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...

Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Recruitment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> researcher: children and young people were involved inwriting <strong>the</strong> job description, advertising post and interviewing candidates.• Design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation: steering groups <strong>of</strong> children, young people andparents helped design and test <strong>the</strong> evaluation approaches and fieldworkinstruments.• Fieldwork: children and young people undertook fieldwork with support andguidance.• Analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> findings: children helped to analyse and interpret datacollected and consider how to present <strong>the</strong> findings.• Presentation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> findings: children and young people were involved indisseminating findings.A similar approach was adopted by a Wave One evaluation. This evaluation workedwith <strong>the</strong> partnership to establish <strong>the</strong> ‘… questions <strong>the</strong>y (children and young people)would want answered <strong>from</strong> an evaluation’. Following this, <strong>the</strong> intention was to workwith a small team <strong>of</strong> older young people to ‘select several questions and visitidentified projects to talk to staff and young people involved…about <strong>the</strong> work <strong>the</strong>y aredoing’. What were called ‘Young Reporters’ collected evaluation material <strong>from</strong>projects in an attempt to draw children and young people into <strong>the</strong> evaluation process.According to <strong>the</strong> evaluators, a key advantage was that children and young peoplebrought informality to <strong>the</strong> research process and an ability to elicit appropriate data,<strong>the</strong> generation <strong>of</strong> which may not have o<strong>the</strong>rwise been recorded, as is described in<strong>the</strong> evaluation report:The Young Reporters are able, in a very direct way, to feedback to project staffwhat <strong>the</strong> children… are saying and also to ask challenging questions…Feedback <strong>from</strong> projects suggests that this is quite a disarming process thatinduces replies that might not have been so readily given to an adult evaluatorFor this and a number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r evaluations, recognising <strong>the</strong> skills <strong>of</strong> children andyoung people and applying <strong>the</strong>se to research processes was seen as enrichingevaluation data. By being interviewed by <strong>the</strong>ir peers, younger service users wereable to ‘give candid views about <strong>the</strong>ir experiences’. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>Young Reporters could be used as an exemplar <strong>of</strong> good practice within <strong>the</strong>Children’s Fund partnership and be drawn upon as a useful evaluation tool:It has been acknowledged within <strong>the</strong> programme that <strong>the</strong> Young Reportersinitiative represents a model <strong>of</strong> good practice…projects are learning <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong>Chapter 2 31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!