12.07.2015 Views

Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...

Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...

Local Evaluation of Children's Services Learning from the Children's ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ich source <strong>of</strong> data regarding perspectives about such issues as problems <strong>of</strong> dailylife, physical environments and <strong>the</strong> experiences <strong>of</strong> accessing support services’.Ano<strong>the</strong>r evaluator suggested that by tailoring <strong>the</strong> methods to children and youngpeople, <strong>the</strong>y would be more engaged and <strong>the</strong>refore more willing to express <strong>the</strong>irviews:I mean we’ve definitely chosen specific methodologies for children and youngpeople like <strong>the</strong> photos and drawing and <strong>the</strong> art and craft work because wewanted to make it fun really. We didn’t really want to give <strong>the</strong>m ano<strong>the</strong>r kind <strong>of</strong>boring tick box questionnaire, so we’ve definitely tailored our methodologiesaround <strong>the</strong>mA Wave One evaluation pursued a participatory approach in <strong>the</strong>ir work with childrenand young people. This involved various creative activities and pursuits that wereconsidered appropriate on a number <strong>of</strong> levels in terms <strong>of</strong> encouraging individualexpression, establishing appropriate targeting within services and empoweringservice beneficiaries:Wherever possible a participatory approach was developed, for example usingimages, artwork and games, to engage young people and staff incommunicating what <strong>the</strong>y thought and felt about <strong>the</strong> activity <strong>the</strong>y had beeninvolved in. This sort <strong>of</strong> activity went some way in identifying outcomes relatingto target children, along with children’s engagement. It was an approach thatmirrored <strong>the</strong> original rhetoric <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Children’s Fund Guidance in relation toempowering children, young people, families and communities to becomeinvolved in planning and delivering services, eventually taking responsibility andcontrol <strong>of</strong> solutions to problems for <strong>the</strong>mselves.A minority <strong>of</strong> local evaluators appear to have involved children more fully throughevaluation design, participation in fieldwork, analysis <strong>of</strong> data and presenting findings.For example, a Wave Three evaluation drew on <strong>the</strong> Alderson and Montgomery model<strong>of</strong> ‘participation in decision making’ whereby children and young people are includedin <strong>the</strong> evaluation process <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> outset. The process had two stages; firstlyincluding children and young people in decisions relating to <strong>the</strong> design <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>evaluation and <strong>the</strong>n inviting <strong>the</strong>m to have a significant input in how <strong>the</strong> research wasconducted. Similarly, a Wave Three evaluation used a participatory action researchmodel attempting to ascertain why children, young people and <strong>the</strong>ir families might notbe inclined to use Children’s Fund services in this partnership area. This involveddrawing on <strong>the</strong>se potential service-users at all stages <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation process, asdescribed below:30Chapter 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!