12.07.2015 Views

Many Roads to Justice: The Law Related Work of Ford ... - UNDP

Many Roads to Justice: The Law Related Work of Ford ... - UNDP

Many Roads to Justice: The Law Related Work of Ford ... - UNDP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 2 4 TH E M AT I CPE R S P E C T I V E Simportant advances in the short nine months that it had <strong>to</strong> completeits investigations and report.R e s e a rch <strong>to</strong> Enhance the Public Debate<strong>Law</strong>-related work can <strong>of</strong>ten be more effective when it reachesbeyond a narrow, legal realm. To be broadly unders<strong>to</strong>od and widelysupported, such work needs <strong>to</strong> be made public. This objectivecan, <strong>of</strong> course, be accomplished without research. But good informationand high-quality analysis can help nourish and stimulate apublic discussion about a legal question. If done creatively, withattention <strong>to</strong> targeted sec<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> the population, research activitiescan significantly enhance public debate and help build support forlegal policy reforms. Without accurate and convincing information,positive options and ideas are less likely <strong>to</strong> get the attentionthey deserve.In a number <strong>of</strong> countries, issues <strong>of</strong> racial discrimination andminority rights have generated considerable research attention inan effort <strong>to</strong> engage the public in searches for solutions. T h r e eexamples from different parts <strong>of</strong> the globe follow.When court decisions and political rhe<strong>to</strong>ric in the UnitedStates led <strong>to</strong> a groundswell <strong>of</strong> attacks on affirmative action policies,Americans for a Fair Chance (AFC), a consortium <strong>of</strong> six <strong>of</strong>the most prominent U.S. civil rights and women’s rights groups,was formed specifically <strong>to</strong> broaden public understanding <strong>of</strong>antidiscrimination policies. Using solid data about the use ande ffect <strong>of</strong> affirmative action programs, AFC challenges negativemisconceptions, argues that affirmative action should not beequated with preferences or quotas, and shows that on the wholesuch programs have been fairly implemented. Research used byAFC ranges from intensive studies done by academic centers,government agencies, and other sources, <strong>to</strong> its own commissionedresearch. In addition, AFC has used public opinion polls, focusgroups, <strong>to</strong>wn meetings, and other <strong>to</strong>ols <strong>to</strong> assess the publicresponse <strong>to</strong> the issues it works on, and <strong>to</strong> develop a better understanding<strong>of</strong> how best <strong>to</strong> deliver its own messages. While aff i r m a-tive action policies continue <strong>to</strong> face difficult challenges nationwide,A F C ’s work has enabled defenders <strong>of</strong> those policies <strong>to</strong> craftsubstantive, fact-based messages that highlight the benefits <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!