12.07.2015 Views

Many Roads to Justice: The Law Related Work of Ford ... - UNDP

Many Roads to Justice: The Law Related Work of Ford ... - UNDP

Many Roads to Justice: The Law Related Work of Ford ... - UNDP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 0 CA S E ST U D I E Sbeen for the fact that they chose issues and aspects <strong>of</strong> the ‘struggl e ’ that already had great momentum within the mass liberationmovement.” An essential lesson <strong>of</strong> the pass law cases, saysRichard Abel, was that “judicial vic<strong>to</strong>ries are embedded in politicalstruggles; they are neither self-realizing nor self-eff e c t u a t i n g ;appellate decisions are the beginning <strong>of</strong> the fight, not the end.” 8As these dramatic disputes unfolded, <strong>Ford</strong>’s South Africa staffwas <strong>of</strong> necessity based at its New York City headquarters throughthe 1980s, 9 but remained heavily engaged with the law programand other activities in South Africa. <strong>The</strong>y would visit frequently,for twenty or more person-weeks per year, <strong>of</strong>ten for about threeweeks at a time. Though the Foundation generally prefers itsoverseas programming <strong>to</strong> be field based, its South Africa stafffound that regular and lengthy visits enabled them <strong>to</strong> make fundingdecisions with confidence in their judgment and theirg r a n t e e s . 1 0 <strong>The</strong>y would discuss progress and problems withgrantees, explore potential programming opportunities, generallyassess the evolving lay <strong>of</strong> the land, and encourage grantees asthey labored under trying circumstances.Such encouragement was appreciated by LRC, for example,because the group encountered both government opposition—reliable reports indicated that some <strong>of</strong>ficials considered LRC acommunist front and contemplated banning it—and because itsstrategic litigation was the subject <strong>of</strong> some initial progressivescorn. <strong>The</strong>re were those involved in the antiapartheid strugglewho felt that such work legitimized the courts’ i n s t i t u t i o n a l i z e dracism, and opposed LRC’s and CALS’s efforts in this regard. Forexample, the then-exiled opposition lawyer (and currentConstitutional Court <strong>Justice</strong>) Albie Sachs initially questionedL R C ’s reformist orientation, “because I feared that people wouldsee it as an alternative <strong>to</strong> the political struggle.” He and manyother skeptics later came <strong>to</strong> support this work.It would be an overstatement <strong>to</strong> place NGO lawyers at theheart <strong>of</strong> the struggle that brought down apartheid. Larger forceswere at play. And other individuals and organizations <strong>to</strong>ok greaterrisks. Still, time revealed the value <strong>of</strong> recognizing the authority <strong>of</strong>the courts in order <strong>to</strong> help undermine the foundations <strong>of</strong>a p a r t h e i d .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!