2. Managing Mens Rea in Singapore - Singapore Academy of Law
2. Managing Mens Rea in Singapore - Singapore Academy of Law
2. Managing Mens Rea in Singapore - Singapore Academy of Law
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
18 SAcLJ 314 <strong>Manag<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Mens</strong> <strong>Rea</strong> <strong>in</strong> S<strong>in</strong>gapore 371Rashness, negligence and section 304A <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code105 In the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Home Affairs’ recently-unveiled proposals toreform the Penal Code, 167 an <strong>in</strong>tention is expressed to formally bifurcatesection 304A – where death is caused by a rash act, the maximum penaltyshall be five years’ imprisonment; where it is caused by a negligent act, themaximum rema<strong>in</strong>s at two years’ imprisonment. This would enforce theconceptual dist<strong>in</strong>ction between rashness (or recklessness) and negligence,but while five years for the reckless caus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> death is perhapsconceivable, one must th<strong>in</strong>k very hard for a situation <strong>in</strong> which two years’imprisonment might be thought to be an appropriate punishment for anegligence <strong>of</strong>fence.167 The M<strong>in</strong>istry’s consultation paper and draft Penal Code (Amendment) Bill areavailable at (accessed22 December 2006).