82 SMITHSONIAN STUDIES IN HISTORY AND TECHNOLOGYFIGURE 60.—1881 regulation chapeau.(From Horstmann Bros. & Co., Illustrated Catalogue, 1877.)Corps of Engineers chapeau is also in the NationalCollections.*"' The 1859 specimen measures 18i/4inches in overall length, the right fan 6 inches high,the left 6i/4. The gold braid loop is 6i/4 by 2i/^inches on a round black silk cockade 4i/^ inches indiameter. The lining is of brown silk and carriesthe maker's label "St. Nicholas Hotel/No. 519B'way/New York/Warnock & Co." The sweat is ofbrown leather. The specimen folds flat and is verysimilar to the Schuyler, Hartley, and Graham illustration.Others of this model match it closely inall details.A number of biographical specimens of the lowerfan pattern, which seems to have come into vogue1877-1881, are in the National Collections and allare very similar to one another in measurementsand conformation. The average is 17i/4 incheslong overall with the right fan 5 inches high andthe left 51/4- The gold braid loops, however, varyfrom 414 to 51/2 inches in length and from 2 to 21^inches in width. The eagle on the loops of the majorityof them is the 1872 cap eagle in metal. Thechapeaux formerly belonging to Generals Shermanand Sheridan are of particular interest in that theycarry, instead of the loop and eagle, the cockadeornament prescribed for general officers in the 1832regulations, although of slightly reduced dimensionsin accordance with the reduced dimensions ofthe chapeaux: "gold rays emanating from the eagle21/2 inches computing from the center, terminatingin 24 silver stars." ^- The eagle in the center of therays in these two cases is an embroidered cut-downversion of the 1858 hat eagle.The version described in the 1912 specificationsis best typified by that formerly owned by MajorGeneral William Crawford Gorgas, Assistant Sm-
NUMBER 30geon 1880 and Surgeon General 1914-1918 (Figure62). It conforms closely to the 1877-1881 models inoverall measurements and conformation, althoughthe loop is somewhat smaller than that prescribed,being 4i/^ by 2 inches. The eagle is in gold embroidery.The sweat is of brown leather and thelining is black silk with the maker's label "S.N.Meyer/1231 Pa. Ave. N.W./Washington/D.C." Thespecimen folds flat.It is interesting to note that of all the chapeauxexamined that date from 1859 onward, less than10 percent have a "stiff crown," that is, are "formfitted," as opposed to "flat."Although for all intents and purposes it diedwith the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>' entry into World War I,the chapeau was not finally and officially droppedas an item of officers' dress until 1936. GeneralOrder No. 49, War Department, 28 April 1917, andGeneral Order No. 63, War Department, 15 May1917, suspended the wear of dress uniforms exceptat White House functions. These orders supercededthe uniform regulations published in SpecialRegulations 41 and 42, War Department, 15 August1917 (which, although of a later date, merelydescribed the uniform), which authorized the chapeauand described it in detail. General Order No.86, War Department, 3 July 1919, rescinded regulationsprescribing dress uniforms for both officersand enlisted personnel. Dress blues as described inSpecial Regulations 41 and 42 cited above were reauthorized,however, on an optional basis in 1929by Circular 5, War Department, 26 January 1929.Circular 66, War Department, 15 October 1936rescinded Circular 5 of 1929 and substituted newtentative regulations for dress blues, which wereformalized in <strong>Army</strong> Regulation 600-38, War Department,17 August 1938. This latter did notmention a chapeau.THE 1895 FORAGE CAPThe forage cap adopted in 1895 had a short andsomewhat strange history. There is no doubt thata change in undress headgear was needed. The1872 "chasseur pattern" offered but slight protectionfrom the weather and was too shallow to sitfirmly on the head. A change was made, but theresult was never popular.As to styling the change marked an end to Frenchinfluence and in a sense a return to the British."'Although the pattern might be said to be a naturalprogression from the 1825 American model, in actualityits origin probably lies more with the capsworn by several British regiments in the 1850's,which the U.S. Navy seems to have copied in its1864-1866 uniform change.""' Whatever the origin,the model was popular in certain civilian circles,becoming almost standard wear in the last quarterof the century by trainmen, streetcar operators,and baseball players.During the 1870s, 1880s, and into the 1890s agitationin the army for a change continued, sometimeswith drawings and even samples of proposed
- Page 1:
• ^ - :lP-'L^ry\'^ ^iT
- Page 4 and 5:
ABSTRACTHowell, Edgar M. United Sta
- Page 7 and 8:
ContentsPagePrefaceiiiThe 1855 Cava
- Page 9 and 10:
United States Army Headgear 1855-19
- Page 11 and 12:
NUMBER 30report, stated: "The hat p
- Page 13 and 14:
NUMBER 30acorns %g inches long and
- Page 15 and 16:
NUMBER 30the pattern." The rate of
- Page 17 and 18:
NUMBER 30FIGURE 3.—1858 Army hat.
- Page 19 and 20:
NUMBER 3011model, number 60 in the
- Page 21 and 22:
NUMBER 30 13"the desired modificati
- Page 23 and 24:
NUMBER 30 15the sun in the top. The
- Page 25 and 26:
NUMBER 30 17FIGURE 8.—1858 forage
- Page 27 and 28:
NUMBER 30 19Hardtack and Coffee, ca
- Page 29 and 30:
NUMBER 3021FIGURE 11.—a, Brigadie
- Page 31 and 32:
NUMBER 30 23short "shell" jacket "f
- Page 33 and 34:
NUMBER 30 26broad, securely soldere
- Page 35 and 36:
NUMBER 30 27worn in the picture wer
- Page 37 and 38:
NUMBER 30 29This communication elic
- Page 39 and 40: NUMBER 30 31FIGURE 17.—"The [Scot
- Page 41 and 42: NUMBER 30 33time for issue in the c
- Page 43 and 44: NUMBER 30 35be at too great a dista
- Page 45 and 46: NUMBER 3037half (5/2) part of washb
- Page 47 and 48: NUMBER 30 39trimmings for all enlis
- Page 49 and 50: NUMBER 30 41ing the upper space for
- Page 51 and 52: NUMBER 30rear one to a correspondin
- Page 53 and 54: NUMBER 30 46FIGURE 29.—1872 enlis
- Page 55 and 56: NUMBER 3047FIGURE 32.—^The Bent &
- Page 57 and 58: NUMBER 3049of strong split-leather
- Page 59 and 60: NUMBER 30 51''""MttfenFIGURE 35.—
- Page 61 and 62: NUMBER 30 53(which he thought might
- Page 63 and 64: NUMBER 30 55FIGURE 38.—Captain Be
- Page 65 and 66: NUMBER 30 57campaign hat for the Ar
- Page 67 and 68: NUMBER 30 59salvage something from
- Page 69 and 70: NUMBER 30 61hat. In June 1899 the P
- Page 71 and 72: NUMBER 3063the left side, pass diag
- Page 73 and 74: NUMBER 30 65.LJU^.."*^..FIGURE 44.
- Page 75 and 76: NUMBER 30 67to be sent to Washingto
- Page 77 and 78: NUMBER 30 69with brass sliding-buck
- Page 79 and 80: NUMBER 30 71FIGURE 48.—Officers'
- Page 81 and 82: NUMBER 3073The adoption of the whit
- Page 83 and 84: NUMBER 3075i >•^\Wiii I ifiiiniim
- Page 85 and 86: NUMBER 30this last model made no pr
- Page 87 and 88: NUMBER 30 79WAR DEPARTMENT,QUARTERM
- Page 89: NUMBER 3081FIGURE 58.—1864 chapea
- Page 93 and 94: NUMBER 3085FIGURE 63.—1895 forage
- Page 95 and 96: NUMBER 30 87of not less than 9.24 g
- Page 97 and 98: AppendixMAKERS OF HEADGEARThe chron
- Page 99 and 100: List of AbbreviationsAAGAAQMAGAGOAQ
- Page 101 and 102: NUMBER 3093all OQMG, LS, Clothing,
- Page 103 and 104: NUMBER 30 95"Jesup to Thomas, 8 Dec
- Page 105 and 106: NUMBER 3097OQMG, Reg. LR, Clothing,
- Page 107 and 108: NUMBER 30 99October of 1870. See Me
- Page 109 and 110: NUMBER 30 101'"* See above, pp. 35-
- Page 111 and 112: NUMBER 30 103Monroe, Va., in 1878.
- Page 113 and 114: NUMBER 30 105""Endorsement, 24 May
- Page 115 and 116: ReferencesThe bulk of the source ma
- Page 117: M MBIiR 30 10910, No. 355-10, 19 Se