13.07.2015 Views

Program Book - Keck School of Medicine of USC - University of ...

Program Book - Keck School of Medicine of USC - University of ...

Program Book - Keck School of Medicine of USC - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Replacement <strong>of</strong> InfectedCatheters over Guidewire• Beathard, J AM Soc Nephrol, 1999• 123 cases, three groups: Catheter exchange withnew tunnel, without new tunnel, or removal anddelayed re-insertion• 75 – 85% cure at 45 days, no diff between groups• Tanriover, et al, Kidney Intl, 2000• 69 cases without overt sepsis• 31 immediate guidewire exchange, 38 delayed• No difference between groups in Infection freesurvival ~ 60% @ 50 days• KDOQI 2006 Guidelines• Recommended exchange over guidewire in absence<strong>of</strong> gross infection/sepsisManagement <strong>of</strong> CRB• Mokrzycki, et al, Am Journal <strong>of</strong> Kidney Diseases, 2006• Compared outcomes <strong>of</strong> CRB in 223 cases in 7dialysis units w/wo dedicated catheter infectionmanagement team• Dedicated team associated with 73% (p < .02)decrease in combined endpoint <strong>of</strong> recurrentbacteremia and septic death• Guttman et al, J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2011• 61 cases, 25 guidewire exchange, 35 same dayremoval/replacement at new site• Infection rate 4.4 vs 2.3 per 1000 cath days (p = .49)Management <strong>of</strong> CRB• Mokrzycki et al, NephrolDial Transplant, 2006• Multivariate analysis in226 patients• Guidewire exchange vsremoval / delayedreplacement equivalent• Predictors <strong>of</strong> treatmentfailure were cathetersalvage (OR 5.4, p =.003) and S. aureusinfection (OR 4.2, p=.002)103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!