13.07.2015 Views

Banc y Celyn, Brecknockshire - Royal Commission on the Ancient ...

Banc y Celyn, Brecknockshire - Royal Commission on the Ancient ...

Banc y Celyn, Brecknockshire - Royal Commission on the Ancient ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Uplands Initiative – <str<strong>on</strong>g>Banc</str<strong>on</strong>g> y <str<strong>on</strong>g>Celyn</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2008of NPRN 247220 near Nantyroffeiriad Fawr. It runs west-southwest for some 85m off<strong>the</strong> present comm<strong>on</strong> boundary, turns for c.90m to <strong>the</strong> south and <strong>the</strong>n seems to peter out,at least 250m from <strong>the</strong> nearest point <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> boundary. The purpose of such abank does not appear to completely enclose an area, but perhaps to loosely define anarea intended for improvement or cultivati<strong>on</strong>. Dating such a bank is difficult, but <strong>the</strong>fact that <strong>the</strong>re is ridge and furrow cultivati<strong>on</strong> across <strong>the</strong> wider area, as well as two crossc<strong>on</strong>tourplatforms nearby (NPRNs 247139 & 247258) may imply a medieval or postmedieval date. It is not clear what <strong>the</strong> relati<strong>on</strong>ship with <strong>the</strong> cultivati<strong>on</strong> is, as <strong>the</strong> bankmay overlie it, which would suggest a probable post medieval date.Such enclosures and banks rarely appear <strong>on</strong> historic mapping, and <strong>the</strong>y would seem tobel<strong>on</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> centuries before reliable mapping was produced for <strong>the</strong> area in <strong>the</strong> early19 th century. As a general point, <strong>the</strong> significance of enclosures abutting <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong>boundary is that <strong>the</strong>y may have been created at a time after <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> boundary hadbeen properly defined, and thus are likely to be post medieval in date. However, <strong>the</strong>possibility that some parcels were created <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> open comm<strong>on</strong> and <strong>the</strong>n joined to <strong>the</strong>area of cultivated land by later encroachment or enclosure cannot be dismissed.Possible cultivati<strong>on</strong> marks are visible <strong>on</strong> aerial photographs at a number of locati<strong>on</strong>s,such as <strong>the</strong> Waun Hirwaun locati<strong>on</strong> menti<strong>on</strong>ed above. However, it is rarely possible tobe certain whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>on</strong>e is looking at cultivati<strong>on</strong> marks, more recent land improvement or<strong>the</strong> patterns left <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> ground surface after bracken cutting. This issue poses somedifficulty when interpreting features observed <strong>on</strong> aerial photography and <strong>the</strong> comparingthat evidence with features <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> ground.Some of <strong>the</strong> best ridge and furrow cultivati<strong>on</strong> evidence is best seen around <strong>the</strong> field systemat Pant y Llyn Farmstead, though it survives outside <strong>the</strong> field system which is currentlymaintained and fenced in. It is possible that modern agricultural activity within <strong>the</strong>maintained fields has removed traces of earlier ploughing, whilst those areas of cultivati<strong>on</strong>which were left outside <strong>the</strong> fence line of <strong>the</strong> field system have been left undisturbed.Plate 32: Thesubstantial earthworkbank above CwmGwenddwr (NPRN247368), which runs forover 700m al<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong>spine of <strong>the</strong> ridge. Itsdate is unknown.59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!