13.07.2015 Views

Have the Southern Westerlies changed in a zonally symmetric ...

Have the Southern Westerlies changed in a zonally symmetric ...

Have the Southern Westerlies changed in a zonally symmetric ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

M.-S. Fletcher, P.I. Moreno / Quaternary International 253 (2012) 32e46 33robust scientific <strong>the</strong>ory. Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most visible controversy perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gto <strong>the</strong> SWW through <strong>the</strong> Quaternary regards <strong>the</strong>ir behaviourdur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The oppos<strong>in</strong>g camps<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> palaeoclimate literature argue for ei<strong>the</strong>r a sou<strong>the</strong>rly/polewarddisplacement (e.g. Markgraf, 1987, 1989; Markgraf et al., 1992;Harrison and Dodson, 1993; Markgraf, 1993; Dodson, 1998);a nor<strong>the</strong>rly/equatorward displacement (e.g. Nicholson and Flohn,1980; Heusser, 1989b; Lamy et al., 1999; Moreno et al., 1999;Holmgren et al., 2003; Ono et al., 2004; Shulmeister et al., 2004;Fletcher and Thomas, 2010b); or little, if any, change of <strong>the</strong> meanlatitud<strong>in</strong>al position of <strong>the</strong> SWW relative to today (Wyrwoll et al.,2000; Hesse et al., 2004; Rojas et al., 2009). To date, this issue isstill a matter of discussion and consensus rema<strong>in</strong>s elusive.A less adversarial, but not less contentious issue prevailsbetween models of SWW change through <strong>the</strong> late Pleistocene andHolocene. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> early Holocene <strong>in</strong>terval (ca.11,000e8000 cal ka), for example, arguments exist for botha northward displacement and/or streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> westerlies<strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn South America (west of <strong>the</strong> Andes around 30 S) (Veit,1996) and Australia (e.g. Harrison and Dodson, 1993; Dodson,1998; G<strong>in</strong>gele et al., 2007; Moros et al., 2009); and a southwarddisplacement and/or weaken<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> SWW <strong>in</strong> southwest SouthAmerica (below 32 S) (Jenny et al., 2003; Moreno and Leon, 2003;Moreno, 2004; Villa-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez and Moreno, 2007; Lamy et al.,2010; Moreno et al., 2010), New Zealand (Shulmeister, 1999;McGlone et al., 2000; Shulmeister et al., 2004), Africa (Holmgrenet al., 2003) and Australia (Shulmeister, 1999). The mid Holocene(ca. 7e5 ka) is equally contradictory, with arguments for a northwarddisplacement and/or <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>tensity of westerly flow(relative to <strong>the</strong> early Holocene ca. 11e7 ka) <strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn SouthAmerica (Jenny et al., 2003; Moreno, 2004; Moreno et al., 2010),New Zealand (Shulmeister et al., 2004), Australia (Shulmeister,1999; Fletcher and Thomas, 2010b) andAfrica(Holmgren et al.,2003); and a southward displacement and/or weaker <strong>in</strong>tensityof westerly flow (relative to <strong>the</strong> early Holocene) <strong>in</strong> Australia(Harrison and Dodson, 1993; Moros et al., 2009) and Africa(Nicholson and Flohn, 1980). Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, it is not possible to drawa clear conclusion from <strong>the</strong> palaeoclimate literature as to whe<strong>the</strong>rchanges <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> SWW dur<strong>in</strong>g or s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> LGM have been <strong>zonally</strong><strong>symmetric</strong>, nor is it possible to draw consensus on <strong>the</strong> direction ofwesterly change. The lack of resolve over <strong>the</strong> behaviour of <strong>the</strong>SWW through <strong>the</strong> last glaciale<strong>in</strong>terglacial cycle is, given <strong>the</strong>irimportance <strong>in</strong> regional and global climate systems, an AchillesHeel to attempts at understand<strong>in</strong>g and predict<strong>in</strong>g regional andglobal climate dynamics.A basic premise <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se studies is <strong>the</strong> correlation between localprecipitation and zonal w<strong>in</strong>d speeds, which holds true for severalparts of <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn mid-latitudes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> modern climate (Fig. 1)and which is important <strong>in</strong> a palaeoclimatic context, as it suggeststhat palaeohydrological reconstructions from regions with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Westerly zone of <strong>in</strong>fluence may proxy relative westerlyw<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>fluence. A complicat<strong>in</strong>g factor <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation ofpalaeohydrological changes, though, is that this relationship mayhave <strong>changed</strong> its strength or sign <strong>in</strong> some regions s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> LGM, orthat o<strong>the</strong>r moisture sources not as important <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> modernhydrologic balance could have had more importance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past.Identify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se non-stationarities require an array of detailedrecords, unavailable for most regions today.Fig. 1. Maps show<strong>in</strong>g (a) <strong>the</strong> location of sites and boundary currents mentioned <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> text and (b) <strong>the</strong> local correlation between zonal w<strong>in</strong>d strength and precipitation from <strong>the</strong>equator to 80 S (scale bar <strong>in</strong>dicates <strong>the</strong> strength of correlation; Garreaud, 2007). BC e Benguela Current; AC e Agulhas Current; LC e Leeuw<strong>in</strong> Current; HC e Humboldt Current.Note <strong>the</strong> anti-phased precipitation response to westerly w<strong>in</strong>d speed between west fac<strong>in</strong>g and east fac<strong>in</strong>g coasts <strong>in</strong> all Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Hemisphere landmasses. The grey arrows <strong>in</strong>dicate<strong>the</strong> approximate latitude of maximum westerly w<strong>in</strong>d speed (50 S). Site list: 1 e Western Cape region of South Africa; 2 e Mataputaland, South Africa; 3 e ocean core MD03-2611;4 e Southwest Victoria, Australia; 5 e Western Tasmania, Australia; 6 e Eastern Tasmania, Australia; 7 e Lake George, sou<strong>the</strong>ast Australia; 8 e Okarito Bog, South Island, NewZealand; 9 e Otago, South Island, New Zealand; 10 e Laguna Acuelo, Chile; 11 e Lago Condorito, Chile; 12 e Lago Cardiel, Argent<strong>in</strong>a; 13 e Lago Guanaco, Chile; 14 e Lago Tamar,Chile; 15 e Gran Campo-2, Chile; 16 e Laguna Potrok Aike, Argent<strong>in</strong>a.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!