102. Catarci M, Manc<strong>in</strong>i S, Gentileschi P, Camplone C, Sileri P, Grassi GB.Antibiotic <strong>prophylaxis</strong> <strong>in</strong> elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lack of need or lackof evidence? Surgical Endoscopy 2004;18:638-41.103. Goldfaden A,.Birkmeyer JD Evidence-based practice <strong>in</strong> laparoscopic surgery:perioperative care. Surgical <strong>in</strong>nov 2005;12:51-61.104. Barker FG. Efficacy of prophylactic <strong>antibiotic</strong>s for craniotomy: a meta-analysis.Neurosurgery 1994;35:484-90.105. Langley JM, LeBlanc JC, Drake J, Milner R. Efficacy of antimicrobial<strong>prophylaxis</strong> <strong>in</strong> placement of cerebrosp<strong>in</strong>al fluid shunts: a meta analysis. Cl<strong>in</strong> InfectDis 1993;17:98-103.106. Ha<strong>in</strong>es SJ, Walters BC. Antibiotic <strong>prophylaxis</strong> for cerebrosp<strong>in</strong>al fluid shunts: ameta-analysis. Neurosurgery 1994;34:87-92.107. Ratilal B, Costa J, Sampaio C. Antibiotic <strong>prophylaxis</strong> for surgical <strong>in</strong>troductionof <strong>in</strong>tracranial ventricular shunts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD005365.108. Smaill F, Hofmeyr GJ. Antibiotic <strong>prophylaxis</strong> for cesarean section. CochraneDatabase Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000933. Update <strong>in</strong>: Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2002;3:CD000933.109. Tanos V, Rojansky N. Prophylactic <strong>antibiotic</strong>s <strong>in</strong> abdom<strong>in</strong>al hysterectomy. J AmColl Surg 1994;179:593-600.110. Mittendorf R, Aronson MP, Berry RE, Williams MA, Kupelnick B, Klickste<strong>in</strong> Aet al. Avoid<strong>in</strong>g serious <strong>in</strong>fections associated with abdom<strong>in</strong>al hysterectomy: a metaanalysisof <strong>antibiotic</strong> <strong>prophylaxis</strong>. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1119-24.111. Allen JL, Rampone JF, Wheeless CR. Use of a prophylactic <strong>antibiotic</strong> <strong>in</strong> electivemajor gynaecologic operations. Obstet Gynecol 1972;39:218-24.112. Ledger WJ, Sweet RL, Head<strong>in</strong>gton JT. Prophylactic cephalorid<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> theprevention of postoperative pelvic <strong>in</strong>fections <strong>in</strong> premenopausal women undergo<strong>in</strong>gvag<strong>in</strong>al hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;115:766-74.
113. Sawaya GF, Grady D, Kerlikowske K, Grimes DA. Antibiotics at the time of<strong>in</strong>duced abortion: the case for universal <strong>prophylaxis</strong> based on a meta-analysis. ObstetGynecol 1996;87:884-90.114. Glenny AM, Song F. Antimicrobial <strong>prophylaxis</strong> <strong>in</strong> total hip replacement: asystematic review. Health Technol Assess 1999;3:21-47.115. Hill C, Flamant R, Mazas F, Evrard J. Prophylactic cefazol<strong>in</strong> versus placebo <strong>in</strong>total hip replacement. Report of a multicentre double-bl<strong>in</strong>d randomised trial. Lancet1981;1:795-96.116. Lidwell OM, Lowbury EJ, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley SJ, Lowe D. Effect ofultraclean air <strong>in</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g rooms on deep sepsis <strong>in</strong> the jo<strong>in</strong>t after total hip or kneereplacement: a randomised study. Brit Med J 1982;285:10-14.117. Gillespie WJ, Walenkamp G. Antibiotic <strong>prophylaxis</strong> for surgery for proximalfemoral and other closed long bone fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.2000;2:CD000244. Update <strong>in</strong>: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;1:CD000244.118. Southwell-Keely JP, Russo RR, March L, Cumm<strong>in</strong>g R, Cameron I, Brnabic AJ.Antibiotic <strong>prophylaxis</strong> <strong>in</strong> hip fracture surgery: a metaanalysis. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Orthopaedics& Related Research 2004;419:179-84.119. Boxma H, Broekhuizen T, Patka P, Oost<strong>in</strong>g H. Randomised controlled trial ofs<strong>in</strong>gle dose <strong>antibiotic</strong> <strong>prophylaxis</strong> <strong>in</strong> surgical treatment of closed fractures: the DutchTrauma Trial. Lancet 1996;347:1133-37.120. Beaupre LA, Jones CA, Saunders LD, Johnston DWC, Buck<strong>in</strong>gham J,Majumdar SR. Best practices for elderly hip fracture patients: A systematic overviewof the evidence. Journal of General Internal Medic<strong>in</strong>e 2005;20:1019-25.121. Barker IF, McCormick PC, Ha<strong>in</strong>es SJ, Benzel EC. Efficacy of prophylactic<strong>antibiotic</strong> therapy <strong>in</strong> sp<strong>in</strong>al surgery: A meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2002;51:391-401.122 Bert J, Giann<strong>in</strong>i D, Nace L. Antibiotic <strong>prophylaxis</strong> for arthroscopy of knee: is itnecessary. Artroscopy 2007;23:1-3
- Page 1 and 2:
SNLG17Perioperative antibiotic prop
- Page 3 and 4:
Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxi
- Page 5:
In this regard, the website of the
- Page 9 and 10:
MULTIDISCIPLINARY PANELFulvio Calis
- Page 11 and 12:
Società Italiana di Ortopedia e Tr
- Page 13 and 14:
RCT: Randomised Clinical (controlle
- Page 15 and 16:
Implementation strategies most wide
- Page 17 and 18:
1. Proper ventilation systems in th
- Page 19 and 20:
VI/B Clean-contaminated procedures
- Page 21 and 22:
# Radical prostatectomyRadical cyst
- Page 23 and 24:
I/A Antibiotic prophylaxis should b
- Page 25 and 26:
contact with the surgical field dur
- Page 27 and 28:
3. Management of colonised or infec
- Page 29 and 30:
*measures strongly recommended and
- Page 31 and 32:
included (this issue has been marke
- Page 33 and 34:
possible, the evidence base for the
- Page 35 and 36:
The working group considered that t
- Page 37 and 38:
omission of more recent studies was
- Page 39 and 40:
particular circumstances. Nonethele
- Page 41 and 42:
Dirty:encountered or there is visib
- Page 43 and 44:
• the duration of surgery (when t
- Page 45 and 46:
colitis or diarrhoea. The prevalenc
- Page 47 and 48: Where evidence of efficacy is avail
- Page 49 and 50: (1-expected baseline risk) x expect
- Page 51 and 52: Contamination of the operative site
- Page 53 and 54: • exanthema (rash)Other less spec
- Page 55 and 56: The steady increase in the frequenc
- Page 57 and 58: impact is the same, preference shou
- Page 59 and 60: II/A In most cases antibiotic proph
- Page 61 and 62: For heart surgery performed with ex
- Page 63 and 64: Implementation of the guidelineDeve
- Page 65 and 66: in the field, and the distribution
- Page 67 and 68: If the recommendations indicated in
- Page 69 and 70: - type of antibiotic, dosage and ro
- Page 71 and 72: diagnostic or surgical procedures a
- Page 73 and 74: RESPIRATORY TRACT PROCEDURES AND OP
- Page 75 and 76: - cephalexin § 2 g 30-60 minutes b
- Page 77 and 78: • Vascular graftsNo randomised co
- Page 79 and 80: • infection of both superficial a
- Page 81 and 82: - myocarditis, pericarditis- endoca
- Page 83 and 84: Other CNS surgeryCaesarean sectionA
- Page 85 and 86: 2. Preparation of the surgical team
- Page 87 and 88: - For how many hours does the proto
- Page 89 and 90: 11. Jobe BA, Grasley A, Deveney KE,
- Page 91 and 92: 30. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidel
- Page 93 and 94: 52. Wilcox MH, Cunniffe JG, Trundle
- Page 95 and 96: 71. Aznar R, Mateu M, Miro JM, Gate
- Page 97: 93. Preclik G, Grune S, Leser HG, L
- Page 101 and 102: 133. Pitt HA, Postier RG, MacGowan
- Page 103 and 104: 153. Ballow CH, Schentag JJ. Trends
- Page 105 and 106: 170. van Dijk-van Dam MS, Moll FL,
- Page 107 and 108: 188. Crowe MJ, Cooke EM. Review of
- Page 109 and 110: 205. White A, Schneider T Improving