CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.0 Chapter Overview - DSpace@UM

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Falmer, R.M. 2002, Choose Tomorrow’s Leaders Today, Graziadio Business Report,Pepperdine University.Fizel, J.L. & D’ltri, M.P. 1997, “Managerial Efficiency, Managerial Succession, andOrganizational Performance”, Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol.18, pp.295-308.Friedman, S.D. 1986, “Succession Systems In Large Corporations: Characteristics andCorrelates Of Performance”. Human Resource Management, Vol. 25 No.2, pp. 191-213.Friedman, S.D., & Saul, K. 1991, “A leader’s wake: Organization member reactions toCEO succession”, Journal of Management, Vol.13, pp.255-270.Getty, C. 1993, “Planning successfully for succession planning”, Training &Development Journal, Vol.47 No.11, pp. 31-33.Giambatista, R.C., Rowe, W.G. & Riaz, S. 2005, “Nothing succeeds like succession: Acritical review of leader succession literature since 1994”, The Leadership Quarterly, 16,pp. 963-991Gilgeous, V., & Gilgeous, M. 2001, “A survey to assess the use of a framework formanufacturing excellence”, Integrated Manufacturing System, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, pp.48-58.Greiner, L., Cummings, T., & Bhambri, A. 2002, “When new CEOs succeed and fail: 4-D theory of strategic transformation”, Organization Dynamics, Winter: 1-17.Groves, K.S. 2007, “Integrating leadership development and succession planning bestpractices”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 26 No.3, pp. 239-260.Grusky, O. 1961, “Corporate size, bureaucratization, and managerial succession”,American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 67, pp.263-269.Guinn, S.L. 1999, “Executive development: why successful executives continue tochange”, Career Development International, Vol.4 No.4, pp.240-243.Guinn, S.L. 2000, “Succession planning without job titles”, Career DevelopmentInternational, Vol. 5 No.7, pp. 390-393.Hall, D.T. 1986, “Dilemmas in linking succession planning to individual executivelearning”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 25, pp. 235-265.Hagberg Consulting Group 1999, “Succession planning process”, [online at:www.hcgnet.com, accessed September 2, 2007).Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. 1995, Multivariate DataAnalysis (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.100
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E. & Tatham, R. L. 2006, MultivariateData Analysis (6th ed.), NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Helmich, D.L. 1980, “Board size variation and rates of succession in the corporatepresidency”, Journal of Business Research, Vol.8 No.5, pp.51-63.Hirsh, W. 2000, “Succession Planning Demystified”, Brighton: Institute For EmploymentStudies.Huang, T.C. 1999, “Who Shall Follow? Factors Affecting the Adoption of SuccessionPlans in Taiwan”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 32 No.6, pp. 609-616Huang, T.C. 2001, “Succession Management Systems And Human Resource Outcomes”,International Journal Of Manpower, Vol.22 No.8, pp. 736-747, MCB University PressHutcheson, & Olan, J. 2007, “Why Succession Planning Matters”, Business Week Online,p.19Instep Learning Resources 2005, “How To Develop Succession Plans”, [online at:www.instepUK.com, accessed January 1, 2008].Ip, B., & Jacobs, G. 2006, “Business succession planning: a review of the evidence”,Journal of Small Business & Enterprise Development”, Vol.13 No.3, pp.326-350.Islam, M., Hamid, A.Z.A., & Karim, M.A. 2007, “Manufacturing Practices andPerformance: A Malaysian Study”, International Review of Business Research Papers,Vol.3, No.2, pp. 147-161.Johnson, J.E., Costa, L.L., Marshall, S.B., Moran, M.J. & Henderson, C.S. 1994,“Succession management: a model for developing nursing leaders”, NursingManagement, Vol.25 No.6, pp.50-55.Kaiser, H. 1974, “An index of factorial simplicity”, Psychometrika, Vol. 39, pp. 31-36.Kakabadse, A., & Kakabadse, N. 2001, “Dynamics of Executive Succession”, CorporateGovernance, Vol. 1 No.3, pp.9-14.Kennedy, P. 1998, A Guide to Econometrics, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Kesner, I.F., & Sebora, T.C. 1994, “Executive Succession: Past, Present & Future”,Journal of Management, Vol. 20 No.2, pp. 327-372.Killian, C.M., Hukai, D. & McCarty, C.E. 2005, “Building diversity in the pipeline tocorporate leadership”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 24 No.2, pp.155-68.101
Page 2 and 3:
the resources and support to establ
Page 4 and 5:
Cheng (2007) indicates that expatri
Page 6 and 7:
employees. It also indicates that t
Page 8 and 9:
Figure 1.1: Malaysia’s Population
Page 10 and 11:
1.4 Objective Of The StudyThe ultim
Page 12 and 13:
formal succession planning in their
Page 14 and 15:
The final chapter concludes the res
Page 16 and 17:
develop intellectual and knowledge
Page 18 and 19:
usiness plan can only be realized w
Page 20 and 21:
acquisition and retention of custom
Page 22 and 23:
1) Helped organization with interna
Page 25 and 26:
Australian firms. It is reported th
Page 27 and 28:
four possible candidates that could
Page 29 and 30:
2) Tied the succession planning pro
Page 31 and 32:
In 1986, Hall conducted a research
Page 33 and 34:
The characteristics of an effective
Page 35 and 36:
3) Development plans for future lea
Page 37 and 38:
Busine & Watt (2005) recommend seve
Page 39 and 40:
Figure 3.1: Theoretical Framework:
Page 41 and 42:
management policies, practices and
Page 43 and 44:
12) Need to increase retention.In S
Page 45 and 46:
3.3 Sampling DesignThe data for thi
Page 47 and 48:
3.5 Data Analysis TechniquesThe dat
Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH RESULTS4.0 Chap
Page 51 and 52: Out of the 108 responding firms, 53
Page 53 and 54: Table 4.3: Characteristics Of The D
Page 55 and 56: number of vacancies” on the quest
Page 57 and 58: In terms of organizational levels o
Page 59 and 60: demand in the business which had cr
Page 61 and 62: Prior studies found that the most e
Page 63 and 64: Table 4.9: Methods Used For Evaluat
Page 65 and 66: conduct when the participants in on
Page 67 and 68: H1 (b): There is a significant diff
Page 69 and 70: of practices and approach of succes
Page 71 and 72: Olkin (KMO) were also used to asses
Page 73 and 74: Whereas the second factor (F2), cla
Page 75 and 76: 3.00 on average, indicating that th
Page 77: 4.8 Pearson Product-Moment Correlat
Page 80 and 81: Based on the results reported in Ta
Page 82 and 83: 4.9 Multiple Regression AnalysisMul
Page 84 and 85: independent (succession planning ch
Page 86 and 87: there was no serious multicollinear
Page 88 and 89: CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEN
Page 90 and 91: eliability estimate. In addition, t
Page 92 and 93: a key talent or leadership can happ
Page 94 and 95: While this study attempt to look in
Page 96 and 97: products/services, and retention of
Page 98 and 99: Buckner, M., & Savenski, L. 1994, S
Page 102 and 103: Kim, S. 2003, “Linking employee a
Page 104 and 105: Rothwell, W.J. 2001, Effective Succ
Page 106: Zikmund, W.G. 2003, Business Resear
show all

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.0 Chapter Overview - DSpace@UM

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?