Kim, S. 2003, “Linking employee assessments to succession planning”, Public PersonnelManagement, Vol.32 No.4, pp. 533-48.Kiyonaga, N.B. 2004, “Today is the tomorrow You Worried About Yesterday: Meetingthe Challenges of a Changing Workforce”, Public Personnel Management, Vol. 33 No.4,p.361.Kransdorff, A. 1996, “Succession planning in a fast-changing world”, ManagingDecision, Vol. 34 No.2, pp.30-34.Karaevli, A., & Hall, D.T. 2003, “Growing Leaders for turbulent Times: Is SuccessionPlanning Up to the Challenges?”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 32 No.1, pp. 62-79.Koch, M.J., & McGrath, R.G. 1996, “Improving labor productivity human resourcemanagement policies do matter”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17, pp. 335-354.Kotter, J.P. & Heskett, J.L. 1996, Corporate Culture and Performance, Free Press, NewYork, NY.Lambert, H. 2005, “Succession planning”, [online at: www.hayspersonnel.com, accessedSeptember 2, 2007).Leibman, M. Bruer, R., & Maki, B. 1996, “Succession Management: The NextGeneration Of Succession Planning”, Human Resource Planning, p.3, p.19, pp. 16-29.Malaysian Code On Corporate Governance (Revised 2007), Securities Commission.Mahler, W.R. 1981, Management Succession Planning: New Approaches for the 80’s”,Human Resource Planning, pp 221-227.McConnell, C.R. 1996, “Succeeding with succession planning”, Health Care Supervisor,Vol.15 No.2, pp.67-71.McElwain, J.E. 1991, “Succession plans designed to manage change”, HR Magazine,Vol. 36 No.2, pp. 67-71.McManis, G.L., & Leibman, M.S. 1988, “Succession Planners”, PersonnelAdministration (April 1988), pp. 24-30.Mehta, M. 2007, “Half Of Malaysia’s Senior Corporate Staff Want To Leave Employer”,Bernama, 17 February, viewed on 20 February, 2008 , [http://bernama.com]Ministry Of Domestic Trade & Consumer Affairs 2008, “Definition of small, medium,and large firms”, [online at: www.kpdnhep.gov.my, accessed February 2, 2008].102
Moore, K.W. 1986, Thoughts On Management Succession Planning, NationalUnderwriter, 90:45, p.17.Motwani, J., Levenburg, N.M., & Schwarz, T.V. 2006, “Succession Planning in SMEs:An Empirical Analysis”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 24 No.5, pp.471-495.Murphy, S.A. 2006, “Executive development and succession planning: qualitativeevidence”, International Journal of police Science & Management, Vol.8 No.4, pp.253-265.Neter, J., Wasserman, W., Nachtsheim, C.J. & Kutner, M.H. 1996, Applied LinearStatistical Models, Chicago, IL: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.Nunnaly, J.C. 1978, Psychometric Theory, 2 ndCompany.ed., New York: McGraw-Hill BookOrellano, T., & Miller, J. 1997, Succession Planning: Lessons From Kermit the Frog,Unpublished white paper: SHRM.Ostrowski, P.S. 1986, “Prerequisite for Effective Succession”, Management of PersonnelQuarterly, (pre-1986), Vol.7 No.1, p. 10Pallat, J.L. 2001, SPSS Survival Manual, 1 st ed. Australia: Allen & Unwin.Parrino, R. 1996,”CEO turnover and outside succession: a cross-sectional analysis”,Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 46, pp. 165-197.Pattan, J.E. 1986, “Succession management: management selection”, Personnel, Vol. 63No.11, pp. 24-34.Pecotich, A & Tshung, H.C. 1998, “The effects of management succession in retailservice banking”, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 199-208.Pollitt, D. 2005, “Leadership succession planning, “affects commercial success”: Chiefexecutives crucial to developing high-potential employees”, Human ResourceManagement, Vol.13 No.1, pp. 36-38.Rioux, S. & Bernthal, P. 1999, Succession Management Practices Survey Report, HRBenchmark Group, Pittsburgh, PA.Rhodes, D.W., & Walker, J.W. 1984, “Management Succession and DevelopmentPlanning”, Human Resource Planning, Vol.7 No. 4, pp.157-173.Roberts, B. 2002, “Matching Talent With Tasks”, HR Magazine, Vol.47.103
- Page 2 and 3:
the resources and support to establ
- Page 4 and 5:
Cheng (2007) indicates that expatri
- Page 6 and 7:
employees. It also indicates that t
- Page 8 and 9:
Figure 1.1: Malaysia’s Population
- Page 10 and 11:
1.4 Objective Of The StudyThe ultim
- Page 12 and 13:
formal succession planning in their
- Page 14 and 15:
The final chapter concludes the res
- Page 16 and 17:
develop intellectual and knowledge
- Page 18 and 19:
usiness plan can only be realized w
- Page 20 and 21:
acquisition and retention of custom
- Page 22 and 23:
1) Helped organization with interna
- Page 25 and 26:
Australian firms. It is reported th
- Page 27 and 28:
four possible candidates that could
- Page 29 and 30:
2) Tied the succession planning pro
- Page 31 and 32:
In 1986, Hall conducted a research
- Page 33 and 34:
The characteristics of an effective
- Page 35 and 36:
3) Development plans for future lea
- Page 37 and 38:
Busine & Watt (2005) recommend seve
- Page 39 and 40:
Figure 3.1: Theoretical Framework:
- Page 41 and 42:
management policies, practices and
- Page 43 and 44:
12) Need to increase retention.In S
- Page 45 and 46:
3.3 Sampling DesignThe data for thi
- Page 47 and 48:
3.5 Data Analysis TechniquesThe dat
- Page 49 and 50:
CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH RESULTS4.0 Chap
- Page 51 and 52: Out of the 108 responding firms, 53
- Page 53 and 54: Table 4.3: Characteristics Of The D
- Page 55 and 56: number of vacancies” on the quest
- Page 57 and 58: In terms of organizational levels o
- Page 59 and 60: demand in the business which had cr
- Page 61 and 62: Prior studies found that the most e
- Page 63 and 64: Table 4.9: Methods Used For Evaluat
- Page 65 and 66: conduct when the participants in on
- Page 67 and 68: H1 (b): There is a significant diff
- Page 69 and 70: of practices and approach of succes
- Page 71 and 72: Olkin (KMO) were also used to asses
- Page 73 and 74: Whereas the second factor (F2), cla
- Page 75 and 76: 3.00 on average, indicating that th
- Page 77: 4.8 Pearson Product-Moment Correlat
- Page 80 and 81: Based on the results reported in Ta
- Page 82 and 83: 4.9 Multiple Regression AnalysisMul
- Page 84 and 85: independent (succession planning ch
- Page 86 and 87: there was no serious multicollinear
- Page 88 and 89: CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMEN
- Page 90 and 91: eliability estimate. In addition, t
- Page 92 and 93: a key talent or leadership can happ
- Page 94 and 95: While this study attempt to look in
- Page 96 and 97: products/services, and retention of
- Page 98 and 99: Buckner, M., & Savenski, L. 1994, S
- Page 100 and 101: Falmer, R.M. 2002, Choose Tomorrow
- Page 104 and 105: Rothwell, W.J. 2001, Effective Succ
- Page 106: Zikmund, W.G. 2003, Business Resear