13.07.2015 Views

PhD thesis in English

PhD thesis in English

PhD thesis in English

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Mean-field description of an <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g BECperature with respect to the non<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g case [90]. To study effects of <strong>in</strong>teractionwith<strong>in</strong> the TFSC model, we start from the gas phase. In that case the condensateis absent, and n 0 (r) = 0. If we <strong>in</strong>sert this <strong>in</strong>to Eq. (4.27), we getn th (r) = 1 (ζ ) λ 3 3/2 eβ(µ−2gn th (r)−V (r)). (4.31)TThe condensation first appears <strong>in</strong> the center of the trap, where the follow<strong>in</strong>g relationholds:n th (0) = 1 (ζ ) λ 3 3/2 eβ(µ−2gn th (0)).TTherefore, at the onset of a BEC phase transition, we have µ c = 2gn c th (0) andn c th (0) = 1 ζλ 3 3/2 , which yields the critical value of the chemical potential is µ c =T2gζ 3/2 /λ 3 T . Now we calculate the critical number of atoms <strong>in</strong> the trap as∫ ∞N c = 4π dr r 2 1 (ζ )0 λ 3 3/2 eβ(µ c−2gn th (r)−V (r)). (4.32)TTo calculate the above <strong>in</strong>tegral, we use the perturbative approach and expand thezeta function to power series <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>teraction constant g to l<strong>in</strong>ear terms. Thismeans that we consider the term µ c − 2gn th (r) as a small quantity. In this way weobta<strong>in</strong>N c ≈ 4π≈λ 3 T4πλ 3 T×= 1λ 3 T∫ ∞0∫ ∞0(2 gλ 3 Tdr r 2 [ ζ 3/2(e−βV (r) ) + βζ 1/2(e−βV (r) ) (µ c − 2gn th (r)) ]dr r 2 [ ζ 3/2(e−βV (r) ) + βζ 1/2(e−βV (r) )ζ 3/2 − 2 g (ζ ))]λ 3 3/2 e−βV (r)T[ ] 3/2 [ 2πζβMω 2 3 + 2gβ 1 ζλ 3 3/2 ζ 2 − 2gβ 1 ζTλ 3 T( 12 , 3 2 ; 3 2)], (4.33)where ζ(i, j; k) = ∑ ∞m,n=1 1/mi n j (m + n) k . From the above expression we immediatelyf<strong>in</strong>d the shift of the condensation temperature [90]:δT c = T c<strong>in</strong>t− T 0 cT 0 c= −1.33 a l N1/6 , (4.34)and conclude that repulsive <strong>in</strong>teractions lead to the lower condensation temperaturecompared to the non<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g case. The result (4.34) is derived by assum<strong>in</strong>g that99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!