13.07.2015 Views

PhD thesis in English

PhD thesis in English

PhD thesis in English

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. Mean-field description of an <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g BECto the w<strong>in</strong>gs of the measured velocity distribution of a thermal cloud. The condensatecomponent was identified as a characteristic narrow central peak, and thecondensate fraction was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by fitt<strong>in</strong>g either an additional Gaussian profile ora parabolic TF profile to that part of the distribution, <strong>in</strong> accordance with the previouslydescribed almost-ideal model. These early experimental studies were only ableto validate that the phase diagram of the system is quite accurately described bythe non<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g result from Eq. (1.10). The <strong>in</strong>herent statistical and systematicerrors prevented real quantitative tests of the mean-field models.The first clear experimental demonstration, which measured values of condensatefractions different from the correspond<strong>in</strong>g ideal values of Eq. (1.10), was reported<strong>in</strong> Ref. [89]. The experimental procedure <strong>in</strong>cluded TOF absorption imag<strong>in</strong>g andan additional technique, a coherent Brag scatter<strong>in</strong>g. The advantage of the lattertechnique is its ability to provide a complete spatial separation of the condensateand thermal cloud dur<strong>in</strong>g the TOF expansion. The condensate fraction was determ<strong>in</strong>edwith a high certa<strong>in</strong>ty by count<strong>in</strong>g the scattered atoms. However, once aga<strong>in</strong> aballistic expansion of the thermal cloud was assumed, and the temperature was determ<strong>in</strong>edby fitt<strong>in</strong>g the semiclassical density profile of the expanded non<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>ggas (1.13) to the measured density profile of the thermal cloud. Despite this, the obta<strong>in</strong>edphase diagram clearly demonstrated a reduced condensate fraction comparedto the non<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g result (1.10). A good agreement of experimental values withthe results obta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong> the semi-ideal model was found, while the agreement waseven better with the predictions of the TFSC model. The ma<strong>in</strong> focus of Ref. [89]was a precise measurement of the <strong>in</strong>teraction-<strong>in</strong>duced shift of the condensation temperatureand its comparison with Eq. (4.34). One of the ma<strong>in</strong> conclusions was thatimproved models are necessary for a good quantitative description of the expansionof f<strong>in</strong>ite-temperature BECs and reliable analysis of experimental data.In order to avoid <strong>in</strong>tricacies of the accurate model<strong>in</strong>g of the TOF expansion,Ref. [24] has exploited the <strong>in</strong>-situ phase-contrast imag<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>vestigate the BECphase diagram experimentally. The values of the chemical potential µ and thetemperature T were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by fitt<strong>in</strong>g to functions that stem from the <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>gf<strong>in</strong>ite-temperature models to the <strong>in</strong>-situ measured data. Most reliable fits wereobta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the case of the Popov model [78], which is very similar to the presentedTFSC model. We stress that authors of Ref. [24] have used the consistent procedure:the same mean-field model was used for the extraction of all relevant quantities (µ, T,N 0 , N) from the experimental results, as well as for the analysis of the phase diagram.101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!