PhD thesis in English
PhD thesis in English
PhD thesis in English
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2. Diagonalization of Transition Amplitudesthe well known result [52]ρ sc (E) =( 1) d/2 ∫2π 2Γ (d/2)d⃗x Θ(E − V (⃗x)) (E − V (⃗x)) d/2−1 , (2.32)where Θ is the Heaviside step-function and Γ is the Gamma function. For the quarticanharmonic potential (2.29) <strong>in</strong> d = 1 the density of states can be expressed <strong>in</strong> termsof the complete elliptic <strong>in</strong>tegral of the first k<strong>in</strong>d K(k) = F(π/2, k) [63],ρ sc (E) =√ (√)2/π2 2 1(k2/4 2 + k 4 E/6) 1/4K 2 − k 2 /4√ . (2.33)k22 /4 + k 4 E/6In practical applications, especially <strong>in</strong> d = 1, it might be difficult to comparedirectly semiclassical approximation for density of states and numerically obta<strong>in</strong>edhistogram for ρ(E), s<strong>in</strong>ce energy levels are usually not degenerated, so the spectrumis very sparse. In order to have sufficient statistics for a reasonable histogram, onehas to use large value for b<strong>in</strong> size, and effectively the whole numerically availablespectrum is reduced to just a few b<strong>in</strong>s. For this reason, it is more <strong>in</strong>structive tostudy the cumulative density of states,n(E) =∫ EV m<strong>in</strong>dE ′ ρ(E ′ ) , (2.34)which counts the number of energy eigenstates smaller or equal to E. For quarticanharmonic oscillator the cumulative density of states is given by the above <strong>in</strong>tegralof the complete elliptic <strong>in</strong>tegral of the first k<strong>in</strong>d, and can be calculated numerically.Fig. 2.10 gives comparison of cumulative density of states calculated fromour numerical diagonalization results and semiclassical approximation n sc (E). Asexpected, the agreement is excellent up to very high values of energies, where numericaldiagonalization eventually fails due to the f<strong>in</strong>ite number of calculated energyeigenvalues and effects of discretization. Such behavior can be improved by us<strong>in</strong>gf<strong>in</strong>er discretization (smaller spac<strong>in</strong>g size), as illustrated by two different discretizationsteps for k 4 = 48, <strong>in</strong> Fig. 2.10. Such analysis can be used to assess the obta<strong>in</strong>edspectrum and determ<strong>in</strong>e the number of reliable energy eigenvalues. Typically wecan achieve up to 10 4 reliable energy eigenlevels with simulations on a s<strong>in</strong>gle CPU.In order to further demonstrate the applicability of the method, we also present43