13.07.2015 Views

announcements, tablings and committee reports - Parliament of ...

announcements, tablings and committee reports - Parliament of ...

announcements, tablings and committee reports - Parliament of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tuesday, 29 October 2013] 48973 Section 6: Insertion <strong>of</strong> new subsection 4 to clarifyownership <strong>of</strong> organs <strong>of</strong> stateThis clause clarifies the ownership <strong>and</strong> status <strong>of</strong> assets ownedby organs <strong>of</strong> state, like Transnet, within coastal public property<strong>and</strong> that they can continue to enjoy the use <strong>and</strong> control <strong>of</strong> thesea space within ports <strong>and</strong> harbours.4 Amendment <strong>of</strong> section 7: Coastal public propertyThe Act creates the notion <strong>of</strong> “coastal public property” (CPP),which comprises the territorial waters <strong>of</strong> South Africa up to thehigh-water mark <strong>and</strong> includes admiralty reserves. In otherwords, the beaches, sea <strong>and</strong> sea-bed which occur below thehigh-water mark form part <strong>of</strong> coastal public property. Section11 <strong>of</strong> the Act (which is not yet in operation) vests ownership <strong>of</strong>these natural assets in the citizens to be held in trust by theState. Section 65 (also not yet in operation) prohibitsoccupation <strong>of</strong> CPP without a lease from the Minister <strong>of</strong> theDepartment <strong>of</strong> Environmental Affairs (the Minister). CoastalPublic Property cannot be sold or leased. The Act did notclearly specify whether the infrastructure below the highwater-mark also formed part <strong>of</strong> coastal public property <strong>and</strong> asa result, organs <strong>of</strong> state, such as Transnet, felt uncertainabout the status <strong>of</strong> their assets within ports. Transnet, forexample, leases out spaces on jetties which extend into thesea in order to fund port operations. They are concerned thatthe Act may be interpreted as divesting Transnet <strong>of</strong> itsownership <strong>and</strong> right to lease these jetties. In addition, they areconcerned that the 20-year limitation on leases in section 65limits their ability to secure finances through long-term leases.Clause 4 seeks to clarify that coastal public property does notinclude assets or infrastructure above or below the high watermark.Hence the Act would not negatively impact on theirleases as they would not be subject to the ownership <strong>and</strong>lease restrictions in sections 11 <strong>and</strong> 65.ANNOUNCEMENTS, TABLINGS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS NO 147─2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!