13.07.2015 Views

announcements, tablings and committee reports - Parliament of ...

announcements, tablings and committee reports - Parliament of ...

announcements, tablings and committee reports - Parliament of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4902 [Tuesday, 29 October 2013regulations establish or change coastal (set-back) managementlines. Provinces point out that they are currentlyexperiencing difficulties <strong>and</strong> have to amend some <strong>of</strong> their setbacklines. It is in fact easier to withdraw or amend notices asopposed to amending regulations, it is therefore proposed thatthe MEC be given the power to publish a notice in the Gazetteto establish or change coastal set–back lines, similar to thepowers in section 26 (adjustment <strong>of</strong> boundaries). The MECmay then still by way <strong>of</strong> regulations prohibit or restrict thebuilding <strong>of</strong> structures seaward <strong>of</strong> that coastal set-back line.18 Amendment <strong>of</strong> section 26: Insertion <strong>of</strong> Minister’s powersin respect <strong>of</strong> the coastal protection zoneThis amendment inserts similar wording to what is containedin section 22 to make it clear that where such powers, asdescribed in section 26, are exercised in certaincircumstances in the coastal protection zone, the Ministermust exercise them.19 Amendment <strong>of</strong> section 27: Determining <strong>and</strong> adjusting theboundary <strong>of</strong> coastal public propertyDuring the <strong>Parliament</strong>ary process when enacting the Act, anattempt was made to resolve the issue relating to the status<strong>of</strong> Transnet’s assets within coastal public property (seeparagraph 4 above) by inserting a power to exclude areasfrom coastal public property with the ratification <strong>of</strong><strong>Parliament</strong>. Such ‘exclusion’ was effected prior to thecommencement <strong>of</strong> the Act, whereby certain portions <strong>of</strong> portsunder the control <strong>of</strong> Transnet were excluded from coastalpublic property, which resulted in unintended <strong>and</strong> undesirableconsequences for both Transnet <strong>and</strong> the Department.Transnet found itself in a worse position after the exclusion,as the ports which were previously coastal pubic propertynow became state-owned l<strong>and</strong>, placing them in an equallyANNOUNCEMENTS, TABLINGS AND COMMITTEE REPORTS NO 147─2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!