ResidentAbstract # 2Ahmad Al-SarrafAhmad J. Al-Sarraf MD 1 , Mazhar Haque MB BS, FRACP 2 , Morris Pudek BSc, PhD 3 ,Eric M. Yoshida, MD, MHSc, FRCP(C) 21Department of <strong>Pathology</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Laboratory</strong> medicine, Faculty of medicine, UBC 2 Departmentof <strong>Medicine</strong>, Division of Gastroenterology, UBC <strong>and</strong> BC Transplant 3 Department of <strong>Pathology</strong>& <strong>Laboratory</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong>, VGHcentral pontine myelinolysis following orthotopicliver transplantation- a rare complicationBackround/ObjectivesOrthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the treatment of choice for many acute <strong>and</strong> chronic end-stage liverdiseases as well as selected cases of primary liver malignancy. With the increased number of OLT, some neurologicalcomplications have become apparent. Central pontine myelinolysis (CPM) is a rare <strong>and</strong> severe neurologicalcomplication characterized by acute central pontine neuronal demyelination along with severe occasionally irreversiblemanifestations. We report a patient diagnosed with CPM following OLT in the absence of significant hyponatremia.We suggest that several factors may contribute to the development of CPM following OLT.MethodsA 46-year-old female patient underwent orthotopic liver transplantation due to end stage decompensated cryptogeniccirrhosis with hepatic encephalopathy. Post transplant period was complicated with renal impairment. Later, shedeveloped hepatic artery thrombosis <strong>and</strong> lost her graft. However, clinically she was neurologically unremarkable. Sheunderwent a second transplant a month after the initial one. postoperatively, she developed neurologic symptomscharacteristics of CPM <strong>and</strong> MRI showed changes compatible with CPM with no dramatic changes in sodium plasmalevel.ConclusionCentral pontine myelinolysis has a multifactor aetiology. Slow correction of hyponatremia is crucial for the preventionof CPM, but attention should be given to the group of patients with higher risk factors such as liver transplantations,alcoholism, <strong>and</strong> malnutrition. It should be kept in mind that CPM can affect patients with low, normal, or elevatedserum levels of sodium.12 2 0 1 0 * O r a l P r e s e n t a t i o n s
ResidentTitus Wong 1 , Marc Romney, Gordon Ritchie, Sue Pengilly, <strong>and</strong> Sylvie Champagne1Division of Medical Microbiology, St. Paul’s Hospital <strong>and</strong> 2 Department of <strong>Pathology</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>Laboratory</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong>, <strong>University</strong> of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, CanadaAbstract # 3Titus Wongevaluation of real-time PCR tcdC gene detection assayfor the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infectionBackround/ObjectivesThe tcdC gene within the Clostridium difficile pathogenicity cassette is a negative regulator for toxins A <strong>and</strong> Bexpression. Deletions in the tcdC gene are associated with more virulent strains of C. difficile including ribotype 027.In this prospective study, a C. difficile GDH antigen enzyme-linked immunoassay (Techlab, Blacksburg, VA), a C.difficile Toxin A/B enzyme-linked immunoassay (Techlab, Blacksburg, VA), cell cytotoxicity assay, C. difficile culture<strong>and</strong> an in-house real-time PCR amplifying the tcdC gene were evaluated..MethodsFaecal samples from hospitalized patients with a query diagnosis of C. difficile infection (CDI) were collected for twoconsecutive months at St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, Canada. In total, 430 faecal samples were obtained from 343patients. Samples were first tested according to the hospital’s three step “st<strong>and</strong>ard operating protocol” (SOP), whichconsists of (1) GDH antigen ELISA, (2) Toxin A/B ELISA <strong>and</strong> (3) cell cytotoxicity assay. All faecal samples werecultured on C. difficile agar <strong>and</strong> then frozen for further studies. Samples were then tested with an in-house tcdCgene real-time PCR for performance evaluation. Discordant results were resolved by performing an ethanol shocktreatment; recovered isolates underwent toxigenic culture assay, which is considered the gold st<strong>and</strong>ard for statisticalanalysis..ResultsThere were 331concordantly-negative, 62 concordantly-positive, <strong>and</strong> 37 discordant results for a total concordance/discordance rate of 91% / 9%. After resolution of discordant results, the sensitivity for culture, SOP, <strong>and</strong> PCR were100%, 70.4%, <strong>and</strong> 100%, respectively. The specificity for culture, SOP, <strong>and</strong> PCR were 97.6%, 99.4%, <strong>and</strong> 99.7%.The positive <strong>and</strong> negative predictive values for culture, SOP, <strong>and</strong> PCR were 91.7%/100%, 96.9%/93.0%, <strong>and</strong>98.9%/100%. For the 37 discordant results, agreement with the gold st<strong>and</strong>ard for culture, SOP <strong>and</strong> PCR was 78.4%,24.3%, <strong>and</strong> 97.3%..ConclusionWe concluded that this in house real-time PCR for the detection of C. difficile tcdC gene is both sensitive <strong>and</strong> specificin our hospital setting for patients with a query diagnosis of CDI. For resolving discordant results, C. difficile tcdCgene real-time PCR had the highest concordance rates when compared to toxigenic culture..<strong>Oral</strong> <strong>Presentations</strong> * 2 0 1 013
- Page 2: PathDay: Keynote Speaker (4:30 pm)T
- Page 5: Conference Outline2010abstract #14
- Page 9 and 10: Table of Contentabstract #57 The ro
- Page 11: ResidentClinical SciencesArwa Al-Ri
- Page 17 and 18: ResidentD. Turbin 1 , D. Gao 2 , J.
- Page 19 and 20: ResidentDavid F Schaeffer 1 , Eric
- Page 21 and 22: ResidentMajid Zolein 1 , Daniel T.
- Page 23 and 24: Graduate StudentAshish K. Marwaha 1
- Page 25 and 26: Graduate StudentAmanda Vanden Hoek
- Page 27 and 28: Graduate StudentXin Ye 1 , Mary Zha
- Page 29: Graduate StudentLisa S. Ang 1 , Sar
- Page 32 and 33: Graduate StudentAbstract # 22Brian
- Page 36 and 37: OtherAbstract # 25Crystal Leung, Li
- Page 38 and 39: OtherAbstract # 27Lise Matzke 1 , W
- Page 40 and 41: Graduate StudentAbstract # 29Varun
- Page 42 and 43: Graduate StudentAbstract # 31Maite
- Page 44 and 45: Post-doctoral FellowAbstract # 33Ra
- Page 46 and 47: Graduate StudentAbstract # 35Hayley
- Page 48: Post-doctoral FellowAbstract # 37Es
- Page 51 and 52: ResidentAhmad Al-Sarraf MD 1, 2 , G
- Page 53 and 54: OtherRebecca Towle 1 , Danielle Mac
- Page 55 and 56: Graduate StudentPaul R. Hiebert 1,2
- Page 57 and 58: Graduate StudentV. Montoya 1 , J. G
- Page 59 and 60: OtherWalter Martz and Henry Kalicia
- Page 61 and 62: OtherKatelyn J. Janzen 1 , Elizabet
- Page 63 and 64:
Graduate StudentJasmine L. Hamilton
- Page 65 and 66:
Graduate StudentIan M. Wilson 1 , K
- Page 67 and 68:
Graduate StudentKelsie L. Thu 1,3 ,
- Page 69 and 70:
OtherLiat Apel-Sarid 1 , Doug Cochr
- Page 71 and 72:
Graduate StudentJennifer R. Choo 1,
- Page 73 and 74:
Graduate StudentEdwin S. Gershom 1
- Page 75 and 76:
OtherYing Qiao 1, 2 , Chansonette H
- Page 77 and 78:
Graduate StudentLeslie YM Chin 1,4
- Page 79 and 80:
Graduate StudentBillie Velapatiño
- Page 81 and 82:
Graduate StudentSophie Stukas 1 , S
- Page 83 and 84:
Graduate StudentKyluik DL and Scott
- Page 85 and 86:
Post-doctoral FellowJoel Montane 1
- Page 87 and 88:
IndexAAbozina A. 45Abraham T. 55All
- Page 89:
Ye X. 27, 82Yee S. 31Yoshida E. 12Y