13.07.2015 Views

Joint Appendix (Part 1)

Joint Appendix (Part 1)

Joint Appendix (Part 1)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 2:10-cv-02225-VBF -JC Document 74 Filed 04/07/11 Page 3 of 9 Page ID #:1316123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627287. Paragraph 7 of Plaintiff’s Complaint states a legal conclusion to which noresponse is required. However, Defendants deny the allegations that they have committedacts of infringement in this District and that they have sold and distributed infringingproducts in this District.GENERAL ALLEGATIONS8. Defendants admit the allegations in Paragraph 8 of Plaintiff’s Complaint.9. Defendants deny the allegations in Paragraph 9 of Plaintiff’s Complaint.10. Defendants deny the allegation in Paragraph 10 that Plaintiff emailedDefendants to demand that they cease and desist using, offering for sale and sellingtobacco pipes infringing the ‘936 patent. The email never made mention of the ‘936patent. Defendants admit the allegation in Paragraph 10 of Plaintiff’s Complaint thatPlaintiff attached a PDF copy to the email of an order of United States District CourtJudge John T. Curtin dated December 14, 2007. Defendants admit the allegation inParagraph 10 of Plaintiff’s Complaint that Plaintiff herein is the named plaintiff in thePeak Case which concerns infringement of the ‘936 patent. Defendants admit theallegation in Paragraph 10 of Plaintiff’s Complaint that Judge Curtin’s order in the PeakCase expressly states that “[T]he ‘936 patent is valid and enforceable.” Defendants denythe allegations in Paragraph 10 of Plaintiff’s Complaint that they had actual notice of the‘936 patent, and validity thereof, since October 28, 2008. Defendants deny the allegationsin Paragraph 10 of Plaintiff’s Complaint that they continued use, offer for sale and sale oftobacco pipes infringing the ‘936 patent on all dates after October 28, 2008.FIRST CLAIM FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT(U.S. Patent No. 6,418,936)11. Defendants repeat and reallege its responses in the paragraphs above as ifset forth fully herein.12. Defendants deny each and every allegation in Paragraph 12 of Plaintiff’sComplaint.13. Defendants deny each and every allegation in Paragraph 13 of Plaintiff’s- 2 -ANSWER OF MIKE’S NOVELTIES, INC. AND MANISCH CHANDER CASE NO. CV10-02225-VBJ (JCx)-A176-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!