13.07.2015 Views

Joint Appendix (Part 1)

Joint Appendix (Part 1)

Joint Appendix (Part 1)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 2:10-cv-02225-VBF -JC Document 87 Filed 06/10/11 Page 5 of 5 Page ID #:1650heavier than the manifold. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317,325, 106 S. Ct. 2548, 2554, 91 L. Ed. 2d 265 (1986); see also Musick v.Burke, 913 F.2d 1390, 1394 (9th Cir. 1990). See Anderson v. LibertyLobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 256, 106 S. Ct. 2505, 2514, 91 L. Ed. 2d 202(1986); see also Opp. at 11; dkt. #50 at 5-6; GMF 53. Because areasonable jury could find that the claim limitation is found in theaccused device, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgmentof Non-Infringement (dkt. #59). See Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGAEntertainment, Inc., 637 F.3d 1314, 1318-19 (Fed. Cir. 2011) (citationsomitted).IT IS SO ORDERED.MINUTES FORM 90 Initials of Deputy Clerk jreCIVIL - GEN-5--A241-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!