Joint Appendix (Part 1)

Ca e 10-cv-02·225-JAK -JC Document 16~ Filed 12/20/11 Page 20f..7 Page ID #:2750123456789,10.11121314)15161718192021222'324252627 '",---'-28VERDICT FORM. When answering the following questiol1S and filling out this Verdict Forln,please follow the directions provided throughout the form. Your allswer to eachquestion must b~ unanill1ouS. Some ofthe questions contain legal terms that are definedand explained ill detail in the Jury Instructions. Please refer to the Jury Instructions ifyou are Ullsure about the lnealling or usage ofany legal term that appears in thequestiol1S below.We, the jury, UnanilTIOusly agree to the answers to the following questionsand returnthelTI under the instructiollS ofthis court as our verdict in this case.INFRINGEMENT,(The q'uestions regarding infringf!1nent should be Ql1SWered regardless afYO'llrfindingswith respect to the validity or invalidity oftl1e patent.)1. HAS PLAINTIFF PROVEN BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THEEVIDENCE THAT'DEFENDAN'T HAS INFRINGED ANY ASSERTEDCLA~M OF U.S..PATENT NO. 6,418,936 ('936 PATENT)?Answer tlle following question regarding injringeJ11ent ofthe (936 Patent with tiYes" orUNo n. A "Yes" i:s afindingfor Plaintiff. A ··'No" is afindingfor Defendal1.t.Yes-A--No_2. IF YOU FOUND THAT DEFENDANT INFRINGED ANY ASSERTEDCLAIM OF THE '936 PATENT, HAS PLAINTIFF PROVEN THAT IT ISHIGHLY PROBABLE·THAT DEFENDANTS' INFRINGEMENT WASWILLFUL?Answer tl1e following questiorz regarding willfill infi t il1gelnent with a "Yes" or "No 'J.A €iYes " is afindingfor Plaintiff. A uNo" is afil1dingfor Deferldant.'2.1YeS~NO_,_~S JAKE LEE PROVEN THAT IT IS MORE LIKELY THAN NOT:' (I) THAT, 'if,f)MIKE'S NOVELTIES, INC. INFRINGED ANY ASSERTED CLA;lM OF JAKELEE'S PATENT; (II) THAT MANISCH CHANDER TOOK ACTION THAT It'JACTUALLY INDUCED THAT INFRINGEMENT BY MI~tS NOVELTIE'S,INC.; AN.o (III) THAT MANISCH CHANDER WAS AWARE OF THE PATENTl.)AND BELIEVED THAT HIS ACTIONS WOULD ENCOURAGEINFRINGEMENT OF A VALID PATENT, OR ALTERNATIVELY THAT HEWAS WILLFULLY BLIND AS TO WHETHER HIS ACTIONS WOULDENCOURAGE INFRINGEMENT OF THE PATENT?.v 1,---A82-