13.07.2015 Views

1 - Ivan Allen, Jr. Digital Collection - Georgia Institute of Technology

1 - Ivan Allen, Jr. Digital Collection - Georgia Institute of Technology

1 - Ivan Allen, Jr. Digital Collection - Georgia Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

'.City Revamp EndorsedWith Ban on 'Spoils'By JIM MERRINERA City Council committeeWednesday approved MayorMaynard Jackson's city reor·ganization p I a n , adding awe a k roadblock against apotential political "spoils system."T;le committee left intact aProXlsed system <strong>of</strong> n i n e"commiss.iooers" and 'l7 "bureaudirectors" to nm the cityat an estimated extra cost <strong>of</strong>$299,001) in 1974 and $364,000next year. The fuJ I councilwill vote on the revamp onti·nance Monday.Alter a 3-3 deadlock, theCommittee on the Executivevoted again and aPPrOVed 4-2an am!!ndment to give bureaudirectors set tenns <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>f lee.However, the mayor caninsistence 01. CoWlCilmanBujdy Fowlkes, the amen(\..ment stipulates that staggeredterms are to be maintained.Most <strong>of</strong> the present 22 activedepartment heads willlikely become bureau chiefsunci::!r the. revamp. Theirpresent terms are protectedunae-' the charter, but oppo-­nents argued t hat futuremayors, unrestrained by termrequirements, coold wreck theOity by fll"ing political oppone:JtsIDi giving jobs to campaign'Mrlen.Sugarman replied that con.tro.I <strong>of</strong> the lOp administrato~'joh;: .is essential to "respoosivenessto the chiefexecutive," and denied any intentionfor a spoils system.He saJd Monday the tWI>--still fire a director, subject to thirds vote provision is "aan. ~ppeal to th~ COUl'cil re- reasonable compromise bequJn~ga tWOothlrtls vote to l".veen two getS or values ...override. Under the new .City '!be mayor has never had ancharte.r, . appeals from fired I objection to some form <strong>of</strong>comnusS lOne~ would reqUJ.reonly a majority vote to O\Ier·ride the mayor.The tw()othirds provision resultedfrom a compromise betweenJackson's chief aide,Jule Sugarman, and. Council·man Richard Guthman, whointroduced the terms-<strong>of</strong>~fice""""""'" LJackson's original revamppac~e, disclosed Feb. 4,would have granted the mayorthe power to fi re the top twotiers <strong>of</strong> administrators--com·missioners and bureau chiefs-41t will. '!be bureau beadsv;oold h;l.ve no right <strong>of</strong> appealto the COWlcil or the persomel_d.At pre sen t, departmentheads are protected by stag.gered four-year tenns <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice.'I11is system was design.ed to prevent a spoils system-wholesale political firingsby incoming mayors.Although the committee hasbeld five meetings on Jackson'srevamp package tllismonth, the possi ble spoils systembecame an issue just this\\-1!ek. Former Alderman Eve-­rett Millican testified Mondaythat Jacltson's plan subvertsthe spirit <strong>of</strong> the new cbarterani would gi\"e career <strong>of</strong>ficialsless job security than asanitation 'A'Orker.Guthman's amendment pro.vides r 0 r four·year tennsunder uncI.aSlSilied civil servoice for bureau chiefs. At the--1protectioo against arbilrnryaction. "The first vote tied 3--3 withGuthman, Fowlkes and JohnCalhoun in favo r <strong>of</strong> theamendment and James B"nd,Hugh Pierce and Morris Finley_.Fowlkes urged the lawmak·ers to vote agaJi and anij afloor fight in the council Monday.Calhoun, who sat on theCharter Comm~n,a~gt.:ed.at length for the pro

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!