13.07.2015 Views

1 - Ivan Allen, Jr. Digital Collection - Georgia Institute of Technology

1 - Ivan Allen, Jr. Digital Collection - Georgia Institute of Technology

1 - Ivan Allen, Jr. Digital Collection - Georgia Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

\~~.~\~\1tJ\O"V~\ ".1.\ ,•}tilLettersDear Me. GUlhman:If you want to playpolitical footblll, go to Cityl!.all, and espeCially drop inat the City Council andZo n ina Board meetings,These boards havevictimized the CollierRoad·Howell Mill Roadneighbors for three yearswith their pendulU mtype emotional voting. Theproperty was at one time1 ~.l.O-.J rlom residential tocommereilil. then li ter thisdeCISion was reversed and ilw II .1&ln magica ll y~"hi,denlial It the techniCl1lin <strong>of</strong> the c·The develo lIy COuncil .con t· P1:r, however, hasInUIlly · doomrnCfcill tll(es T~.a I .COmpletel . .. is ISthe enlir/ In lllle wilh howltandltd ProPOUI hu beenmldhlnd l t~ or better yet,Flcts I ·d nn Igures, nOI toCity Council Denies R e-Zoning PlanEDITOR'S NOTE:The voice <strong>of</strong> even a conscientiouseditor is $eidom, if ever the voice <strong>of</strong> God. But the voice<strong>of</strong> the whole people in a given case is seldom, if ever,anything but the voice <strong>of</strong> truth, and fairness.Therefore, J asked a number <strong>of</strong> residents <strong>of</strong> Howell MillRoad and Colllier Road to express their opinions onthe re-zonina petition <strong>of</strong> would be developers as told inthe editorial below.Parts <strong>of</strong> several/etters are printed inthis issue <strong>of</strong> The Nonh Side News. Others will appearfor a period <strong>of</strong> several weeks, as space permits.The plan <strong>of</strong> three Northsiders, Kim King, AlexMcLennan <strong>Jr</strong>., and Mrs. lois Springer to build a welldesianed shoppinS center at Ihe intersection <strong>of</strong> HowellMill Road and Collier Roads whose shops and servicefirms would <strong>of</strong>fer practically every human need _ hasbeen described as an uSly battle.The one word description is not accurate. Thevictory <strong>of</strong> the opposition to the development ca nnot becalled a battle any more than the victory <strong>of</strong> GelllhisKhan over thousands <strong>of</strong> unarmed, unclothed and unfedsemi-savases can be accurately descibed 1$ a battle. Thedenial <strong>of</strong> the petitinn has more the look <strong>of</strong> a swordthrust <strong>of</strong> deception than <strong>of</strong> a battle with cause aright.Councilman GUlhman, at first an opposer <strong>of</strong> thezoning chanae, which would have given the develope~the riaht to build,later said, in substance, if notpresicely, thai afler investigation he stror,gly urged afavorable vote for the re·zonin, petition_But at the meeting Councilman Guthman votedqainSI the petition, thus causing a tie VOle, which wasbroken by the anti-petition vote <strong>of</strong> Wyche Fowler.-. .The denial <strong>of</strong> the petition was when COuncil met andMe. Guthman YOted to deny Ihe rezoning petitio n in therace <strong>of</strong> 300 residents who pleaded that they wanled thezone change so that the shopping center would nOIonly improve the appearance <strong>of</strong> deteriorating grounds,but wou ld provide a needed service to the comm unity.And while 300 heads <strong>of</strong> households pleaded for theshopping center development only six CitiZens, <strong>of</strong>ficersand leaden <strong>of</strong> the Wild WOOd community , pleaded adenia l <strong>of</strong> the petition.\YUdwood ObjectorsI n a sense, the oP p olltion <strong>of</strong> th esix Wildwood residen ts might well be compared to thecitizens <strong>of</strong> Roswell registering a complaint apinstdaylight saving lime in Decatur or som e o ther remoteplace. This comparison is apt because the 300 heads <strong>of</strong>homes who petitioned for t he development live " nextdoor" to the Irea in question while the half a dozenobjectors <strong>of</strong> the Wildwood community live relat ivelyremote from the sile <strong>of</strong> the proposed shopping center.A lOgical question at this point would seem to be:did the six objectors from WildWood speak for theirhundreds <strong>of</strong> neighbors. If so, why did they not presenta petition?A Good QuestionIf a shopping center does not occupy the groundwhat will the Occupancy be?That is the question.T he answer well could bedevelopment with integrateddevelopment, <strong>of</strong> course, wouldvalue <strong>of</strong> 300 or more homes.a low cost housingtenants. And tha tdeflate overniaht theThis newspaper has fought against and for manyefforts, zone changes in the North Side, Zone changes,<strong>of</strong> course, have been "steam-rolJered" in some cases,But it appears to us that the Howell Mill _ CollierRoads intersection area would be favo red by acommercial development. It is now an eye-sore, fit onlyfor a shopping center.As practically every Northsider kno ws the area <strong>of</strong> theproposed shopping ce nter is not an attractive scene,and compares not at all wit h a typical intersection <strong>of</strong>Nonh Side Roads. The several acres, with only a fewold buildings, have a srubby look. And if the handsomecenter is nOI built deterioration <strong>of</strong> the u nke m p iscene will worsen.For the most part Howell Mill Road ru ns its up-hill ,down dale course through one <strong>of</strong> Ihe most picturesq ueareas <strong>of</strong> the great North Side. The rood, on .....ruch once stooda grist mill for pioneer Atlantans, deserves a better fatethan continued deterioration <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> its moslconspicuous i n te r section.~.Hundreds o f people haveinvestments <strong>of</strong> midd le cost homes wit hin about a milefrom the intersection. And these 300 people, a surveyshows, need the convenience <strong>of</strong> a modern shoppingr center. Mati G. PerkinsCouncilman Guthman On Re-Zoning Caseloaic and Ihe and some have adjOining Deve lopment Commillec say we have JUSI started our points that w(te u~d .?n,';mm" " .,,· nClghbors, I h ave I property, unanimously voted in favor a ll out effort 10 b e survey in thiS ImmnoU ,.., en eRcom pet e y onW·I I son, Ch airman . <strong>of</strong> re-zoning for commercial recog fll . ~e d ~s 10 d'.d IV! ua I s Vill ..·nily I did _ not h IOu I the) e~"d. Th, City 0' th, ZO'i', .o"d. I"" ,>C. with ,i,h" 0" who g,d '.'_ "gots not on what IS wrote Richard GUlhman, ··Of Ihe people, by the Muy G. Pecks would not ,ole ntt.Jeo<strong>Jr</strong>i,h, 0' 'h, "",hbo'hood Ch,i'm," 0' th, PI""" ""oplo "d '0' th, p'opl," '''0' 0' • "'"' Th 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!