View - Kowalewski, M. - Virginia Tech

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY PAPERS, V. 8, 2002FIGURE 4230
LABANDEIRA—PREDATORS, PARASITOIDS, AND PARASITESto more proteinaceous animal tissues, which wereoften supplied by the adult (Malyshev, 1968). Apart of this general shift was the appearance of thelarval cleptoparasitoid habit, in which an insectdevelops at the expense of another (host) insect byconsuming its food supply and depriving the hostof nutrition, thus assuring its eventual death(Eggleton and Belshaw, 1992).Several trophic pathways leading to theevolution of the parasitoid life-habit have beenidentified (Eggleton and Belshaw, 1992). Withinthe Hymenoptera, parasitoidism apparentlyoriginated only once, and most likely grew out ofmycophagy in an earlier Mesozoic symphytanlineage, such as the siricoid sawflies (Whitfield,1998). Siricoid larvae generally inhabit dead woodand feed on symbiotic fungi in tunnels, but someconstituent taxa, lacking such a food supply, deposittheir eggs on other insects that occur in the samehabitat. Thus the initial step toward parasitoidismcould be the usurpation of another species’ fungalfood supply, resulting in the death of the starvedlarval host. Subsequently, there would be a shiftfrom the introduced larva feeding on symbioticfungi to consumption of the host itself. Amodification of this scenario has been proposedby Crowson (1981) to account for the origin ofparasitoids in wood-associated beetle lineages. Onthe other hand, in multiple independent lineages ofDiptera, vertebrate parasitoidism has originated bystep-wise conversion from carrion saprophagy. Thesequence of this transition would have been (i)←FIGURE 4—At left and on the following two pages is represented the fossil history of carnivory for 359hexapod families, expressed as predation, parasitoidism, parasitism, and mixed strategies. Taxonomicranks are orders (capitalized), suborders or superfamilies (italicized, lower-case), and families (regular font,lower-case). A conservative approach is taken whereby assignments to predator, parasitoid, or parasitecategories in extant families are based on a plurality of carnivorous relative to non-carnivorous memberspecies. Trophic assignments of fossil families were inferred from multiple criteria, including relatedness toor inclusion within modern clades with known ecologies, functional morphology, ecological evidence suchas gut contents, or trace-fossil context (see Fig. 2). Many family-level taxa with sporadic or otherwise limitedoccurrences of carnivory among overwhelmingly herbivorous, fungivorous, or detritivorous confamilialswere excluded. Sporivory and pollinivory were not included. Only carnivorous taxa with fossil records areincluded. Geochronology is resolved to stage level and is modified from Gradstein and Ogg (1996), withupdated Lagerstätten ages such as Baltic amber (Ritzkowski, 1997), the Florissant biota (Evanoff et al.,2001), and Dominican amber (Iturralde-Vinent, 2001). Major sources for feeding-type assignments areClausen (1940, carnivorous insects), Janzen (1971, seed predators), Carpenter (1971, 1992, fossil groups),Askew (1979, parasites), Richards and Davies (1977, all insects), Crowson (1981, Coleoptera), Merritt andCummings (1984, aquatic insects), Hagen (1987, insect predators), Gauld and Bolton (1988, Hymenoptera),Lehane (1991, hematophagous insects), Eggleton and Belshaw (1992, parasitoids), Godfray (1994,parasitoids), Schuh and Slater (1995, heteropterous Hemiptera), and Arnett (2000, all insects). Fossiloccurrences are from Bechley (1996), Bechley et al. (2001), Labandeira (1994) and subsequent updates,Poinar and Poinar (1999), and Rasnitsyn (2000; 2002, pers. comm.). Taxonomic classification follows Bechley(1996) and Bechley et al. (2001) for Odonatoptera, Schuh and Slater (1995) for heteropteran Hemiptera,and Naumann et al. (1990) for all other insect orders. Missing epoch designations, from bottom to top:Gzelian (Carboniferous), Early and Middle (Triassic), and Pliocene and Pleistocene (Neogene). Suprafamilialor subordinal designations are: A, Protanisoptera; B, Leptopodomorpha; C, Mantispoidea; D, Tenebrionoidea;E, “Phytophaga”; F, Empidoidea; G, Sciomyzoidea; H, Tephritoidea; I, Ichneumonoidea; and J, Cynipoidea.Asterisks at the bottom of the ranges of the Isotomidae (Collembola) indicate an earliest occurrence in theLochkovian Stage of the Devonian; for the Osmylidae and Nymphidae (Planipennia), first appearances inthe Ladinian Stage of the Triassic; and for the Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) the oldest is from the CarnianStage of the Triassic. A question mark indicates a questionable trophic assignment for the interval indicated.231
Page 1:
THE PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETYPAPERSVo
Page 4 and 5:
The Paleontological Society Special
Page 6 and 7:
AuthorsRICHARD K. BAMBACHBotanical
Page 9 and 10:
THE FOSSIL RECORD OF PREDATIONMicha
Page 13 and 14:
INTRODUCTIONTHE FOSSIL RECORD OF PR
Page 15:
KOWALEWSKI—ANALYTICAL METHODSTHE
Page 18 and 19:
PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY PAPERS, V.
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193: PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY PAPERS, V.
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412:
THE PALEONTOLOGICAL SOCIETY PAPERSP
show all

View - Kowalewski, M. - Virginia Tech

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?