Scope of Payment for Ecosystem Services Mechanism for ... - icimod

More documents

Recommendations

Info

7 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................... 437.1 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... 437.2 Recommendations ............................................................................................... 45Reference………………………………………………………………………………....47Annex-1…………………………………………………………………………………..51Annex-2…………………………………………………………………………………..53Annex-3…………………………………………………………………………………..54Annex-4…………………………………………………………………………………..55Annex-5…………………………………………………………………………………..56Annex-6…………………………………………………………………………………..57Annex-7…………………………………………………………………………………..59xi
List of FiguresFigure 4.1: Methodological Framework of the study 23Figure5.3: Cause and effect pathway in Mahadev Khola Watershed 30Figure 5.4.2.1: Surface water flow and estimated water withdrawal infiscal year 2009/10 31Figure 5.4.2.2: Surface water flow and estimated water withdrawal infiscal year 2010/11 32Figure 5.4.3.1: Population and water consumption in 2001 and2011in upstream and downstream area 33Figure 5.5.1.1: Upstream and Downstream choice of Expected Support 36Figure 5.5.1.2: Choice of Institution the participant wants payment contribution 36xii
Page 7: AcknowledgementsI extend my first a
Page 11: I. Vegetation .....................
Page 15 and 16: List of TablesTable 2.1: Key water-
Page 17 and 18: for human well-being by regulating
Page 19 and 20: 1.3 Objectives of Study:The overall
Page 21 and 22: The quantity of urban water supply
Page 23 and 24: and Perera (2005) reported that the
Page 25 and 26: attempt to formally define PES and
Page 27 and 28: positivelybiasedtowardsdisadvantage
Page 29 and 30: climate change impacts has been inv
Page 31 and 32: community forestry user groups for
Page 33 and 34: 3.1.4 Water source and scarcityNume
Page 35 and 36: Table 3.1: CF recharges MKWS.N Name
Page 37 and 38: Map 3.3: Hanumante Basin in Bhaktap
Page 39 and 40: The methodological tools adopted in
Page 41 and 42: Table 4.1: FGDs in Upstream areaUps
Page 43 and 44: more ES than downstream that may be
Page 45 and 46: Local humanpopulation upstreamArmyb
Page 47 and 48: Ashad(Jun- Jul)Shrawan(Jul- Aug)Bha
Page 49 and 50: Perception of downstream peopleWate
Page 51 and 52: Participant %Paticipant %Participan
Page 53 and 54: conservation activities are conduct
Page 55 and 56: facilitate with proper policy respo
Page 57 and 58: water, purify water, and regulate w
Page 59 and 60: Native water holding trees are bett
Page 61 and 62: 8. Realizing importance of water by
Page 63 and 64:
Joshi, L. 2009. A Community- Based
Page 65 and 66:
USAID. 2003. Investments in Drinkin
Page 67 and 68:
Photo 7: FGD in Ward 7, SudalPhoto
Page 69 and 70:
Annex- 3Questionnaire for Focus Gro
Page 71 and 72:
Annex -5Questionnaire for KUKL offi
Page 73 and 74:
5. Kabita Tyata- 5 Jeetendra Munnan
show all

Scope of Payment for Ecosystem Services Mechanism for ... - icimod

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?