Scope of Payment for Ecosystem Services Mechanism for ... - icimod

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCESAbaja, I.B., Ati, O.F., and Ishaya, S. 2009. Natural of Potable Water Supply and Demandin Jema‟a Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Nigeria. Research Journal ofEnvironmental and Earth Sciences 1(1):16-21.Budhi, G.S., Kuswanto, S.A., and Iqbal, M. 2008. Concept and implementation of PESprogram in the Cidanau Watershed: A lesson learned for future environmentalpolicy.Cemeca Consultant (P.) Ltd. 2010. Initial Environmental Examination of Bhatkekopati-Jitpur- Mahamanjushree- Chareli- Kalamasi- Nagarkot Road Sub- ProjectBhaktapur District, Nepal. Government of Nepal Ministry of Local Development.Diwakar, J., Yami, K.D., and Prasai, T. 2007. Assessment of Drinking Water ofBhaktapur Municipality area in Pre- Monsoon season. Central Department ofEnvironmental Science, Tribhuvan University.Economic Commission of Africa (ECA). 2006. Water in Africa: Management option toenhance the survival growth. Prepared by The New Partnership for AfricaDevelopment (NEPAD), Africa.Escobar, M.M., and Hollander, R. 2009. Institutional sustainability of payment forwatershed ecosystem services, Enablling conditions of institutional arrangements inwatersheds.Gondwe, E. 1990. Water Management in Urban Areas of a developing country.Department of Civil Engineering, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.Jiang, Y. 2009. China‟s water scarcity. Department of Agricultural, Food, and ResourceEconomics, Michigan State University. Journal of Environmental Management 90;3185–3196.Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). 1990. Water supply corporationgroundwater management, Project in Kathmandu Valley, Final Report.Jose, A.M., and Nathaniel, C.A. 1999. Climate change impacts and responses in thePhilippines: water resources. Quezon City, Philippines. Climate research 12; 77-84.47
Joshi, L. 2009. A Community- Based PES scheme for Forest Preservation and SedimentControl in Kulekhani, Nepal. International Center for Integrated MountainDevelopment (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal, 199-203Joshi, L., Pasha, R., Mulyoutami, E., and Beukema, H., 2008. Rubber Agroforestry andPES for Preservation of Biodiversity in Bungo District, Sumatra. InternationalCentre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), Kathmandu, Nepal.Kandel, B.R.. 2007. Willing to Pay Improve Water Quality in Kathmandu Muncipality anApplication of Contingent Valutation Method. Department of Arts in Human andNatural Resource Studies. Kathmandu University .Kannel, P.R., Lee, S., and Lee, Y. 2008. Assessment of spatial-temporal patterns ofsurface and ground water qualities and factors influencing management strategy ofground water system in a urban river corridor of Nepal. Journal of EnvironmentalManagement 86; 595-604.Karn, P.K. 2008. Economic and livelihood values of Churia. A Conservation Newsletter.Publish in International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources(IUCN) Nepal. Volume 8, Number 4.Kim, R. 2007. Access to water and payment for environmental services, JequetepequeWatershed, Peru. Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS).Maskey, N. 2008. Investing in Ecosystem Services: Opportunities and Challenges forShivapuri National Park, Nepal. Lund, Sweden: Lund University. (Master Thesis ofEnvironmental Studies and Sustainability Science)Mousquès, C., Sengsoulychanh, P., Sengtaheuanghoung, O., Latchackack, K., Ribolzi,O., and Pierret, A. 2007. Relevance of Payments for Environmental Services (PES)for Watershed Management in Northern Laos.Niraula, R. R. 2008. Valuation of Watershed services in Sundarijal Watershed A CaseStudy on Payment for Ecosystem Services. Kirtipur, Kathmandu. Department ofEnvrionmental Science, Tribhuvan University.(Master Thesis in EnvrionmentalScience)48
Page 7:
AcknowledgementsI extend my first a
Page 11 and 12: I. Vegetation .....................
Page 13 and 14: List of FiguresFigure 4.1: Methodol
Page 15 and 16: List of TablesTable 2.1: Key water-
Page 17 and 18: for human well-being by regulating
Page 19 and 20: 1.3 Objectives of Study:The overall
Page 21 and 22: The quantity of urban water supply
Page 23 and 24: and Perera (2005) reported that the
Page 25 and 26: attempt to formally define PES and
Page 27 and 28: positivelybiasedtowardsdisadvantage
Page 29 and 30: climate change impacts has been inv
Page 31 and 32: community forestry user groups for
Page 33 and 34: 3.1.4 Water source and scarcityNume
Page 35 and 36: Table 3.1: CF recharges MKWS.N Name
Page 37 and 38: Map 3.3: Hanumante Basin in Bhaktap
Page 39 and 40: The methodological tools adopted in
Page 41 and 42: Table 4.1: FGDs in Upstream areaUps
Page 43 and 44: more ES than downstream that may be
Page 45 and 46: Local humanpopulation upstreamArmyb
Page 47 and 48: Ashad(Jun- Jul)Shrawan(Jul- Aug)Bha
Page 49 and 50: Perception of downstream peopleWate
Page 51 and 52: Participant %Paticipant %Participan
Page 53 and 54: conservation activities are conduct
Page 55 and 56: facilitate with proper policy respo
Page 57 and 58: water, purify water, and regulate w
Page 59 and 60: Native water holding trees are bett
Page 61: 8. Realizing importance of water by
Page 65 and 66: USAID. 2003. Investments in Drinkin
Page 67 and 68: Photo 7: FGD in Ward 7, SudalPhoto
Page 69 and 70: Annex- 3Questionnaire for Focus Gro
Page 71 and 72: Annex -5Questionnaire for KUKL offi
Page 73 and 74: 5. Kabita Tyata- 5 Jeetendra Munnan
show all

Scope of Payment for Ecosystem Services Mechanism for ... - icimod

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?