Scope of Payment for Ecosystem Services Mechanism for ... - icimod

More documents

Recommendations

Info

B. Secondary dataSecondary data were collected from student thesis, journal articles, reports, books andfrom different government and non- governmental organizations such as: KathmanduUpatyaka Khanepani Ltd. (KUKL), Federation of Community Forest Users Nepal(FECOFUN), and District Forest Office (DFO), Cemeca Consultant Limited. JapanInternational Cooperation Agency (JICA), International Union for Conservation of Nature(IUCN), International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), DanishInstitute for International Studies (DIIS), World Agroforestry Centre, World Wide Fund(WWF) , Tribhuvan University (TU) and Small Earth Nepal (SEN).4.2.1 Data analysisAnalysis of data involved the verification of problems, logical organization of data andpresentation of data.The data analysis procedure included:Analysis of land use change in the MKW with the help of Arc GIS 9.3 and fromdata available from different report.Analysis of data available from KUKL and information obtained from directobservations, focus group discussion, key informant survey with differentstakeholders and different journal and reports. Overall findings obtained wereanalyzed from the different level and MS Excel was used to analyse the data.4.3 Methods of Data PreparationDirect ObservationDirect observations from the field were taken for the purpose to perceive the naturalcondition of the watershed.Focus Group DiscussionThe group discussions with upstream and downstream were conducted by consultingresidential people and the organization related with development. For discussion groupswere formed in 3 VDCs of upstream area, water available area and water scarce area indownstream with the help of residential people. Following are the dates, wards, numberof participants and concern organizations for discussion in upstream and downstreamrespectively: (Annex 6)25
Table 4.1: FGDs in Upstream areaUpstreamS Date Ward No. of Concern organizationNNo. participants1 26/07/2011 7 7 Nagarkot AaindadaSamudaik Ban UpobhokataSamitee2 30/07/2011 7 24 Bal Samudaik BanUpobhokata Samitee3 3/08/2011 6 21 Bal Samudaik BanUpobhokata SamiteeTable 4.2: FGDs in Downstream areaDown streamS Date Ward No. ofNNo. participants1 02/06/2011 5 and10Key informant interviewThe officers of KUKL of Bhaktapur and Kathmandu, DFO of Bhaktapur and Kathmandu,Forest guard of Bhal Ban ward number1, 2, 3, and resident people of Municipality helpedfor the information. Altogether 11 key informants were interviewed from the differentorganization and local people (Annex 6).Concern organization7 Canteen workers of KhwopaCollege (Byashi andLalachhe)2 12/06/2011 4 10 Kamal Binayak Pokharitatha Mandir Parisar SudharSamiti (Kamal Binayak)3 30/06/2011 2 18 Liwali Awas Chhetra BikashSamiti (Liwali)26
Page 7: AcknowledgementsI extend my first a
Page 11 and 12: I. Vegetation .....................
Page 13 and 14: List of FiguresFigure 4.1: Methodol
Page 15 and 16: List of TablesTable 2.1: Key water-
Page 17 and 18: for human well-being by regulating
Page 19 and 20: 1.3 Objectives of Study:The overall
Page 21 and 22: The quantity of urban water supply
Page 23 and 24: and Perera (2005) reported that the
Page 25 and 26: attempt to formally define PES and
Page 27 and 28: positivelybiasedtowardsdisadvantage
Page 29 and 30: climate change impacts has been inv
Page 31 and 32: community forestry user groups for
Page 33 and 34: 3.1.4 Water source and scarcityNume
Page 35 and 36: Table 3.1: CF recharges MKWS.N Name
Page 37 and 38: Map 3.3: Hanumante Basin in Bhaktap
Page 39: The methodological tools adopted in
Page 43 and 44: more ES than downstream that may be
Page 45 and 46: Local humanpopulation upstreamArmyb
Page 47 and 48: Ashad(Jun- Jul)Shrawan(Jul- Aug)Bha
Page 49 and 50: Perception of downstream peopleWate
Page 51 and 52: Participant %Paticipant %Participan
Page 53 and 54: conservation activities are conduct
Page 55 and 56: facilitate with proper policy respo
Page 57 and 58: water, purify water, and regulate w
Page 59 and 60: Native water holding trees are bett
Page 61 and 62: 8. Realizing importance of water by
Page 63 and 64: Joshi, L. 2009. A Community- Based
Page 65 and 66: USAID. 2003. Investments in Drinkin
Page 67 and 68: Photo 7: FGD in Ward 7, SudalPhoto
Page 69 and 70: Annex- 3Questionnaire for Focus Gro
Page 71 and 72: Annex -5Questionnaire for KUKL offi
Page 73 and 74: 5. Kabita Tyata- 5 Jeetendra Munnan

Scope of Payment for Ecosystem Services Mechanism for ... - icimod

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?