20.07.2015 Views

Summary - City of Gosnells

Summary - City of Gosnells

Summary - City of Gosnells

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Summary</strong>iiiCanning River system) and exacerbate adverse environmental impacts. The importance <strong>of</strong> the restoration <strong>of</strong>the hydrological regime <strong>of</strong> the area is particularly highlighted by predictions <strong>of</strong> continuing rainfall decline inthe region and the threat that this poses to regional biodiversity.RecommendationsThis survey provided significant new information about the natural values <strong>of</strong> the MKSEA that should beconsidered in the planning process. However, there are major shortfalls in the current understanding <strong>of</strong> thebiological, ecological and physical processes (such as the hydrological maintenance <strong>of</strong> wetlands; thereproductive strategies, demography and genetics <strong>of</strong> threatened flora species; and the use <strong>of</strong> the area by faunaand their migration patterns) and in the definition <strong>of</strong> the basic habitat requirements <strong>of</strong> the Threatened Floraand the Threatened Ecological Communities <strong>of</strong> the area. There have been no threshold values defined for keyvariables (such as the ecological water requirements <strong>of</strong> Threatened Flora Species and Threatened EcologicalCommunities) that should form the basis <strong>of</strong> any assessment <strong>of</strong> the potential effects <strong>of</strong> various planningscenarios on the important conservation values <strong>of</strong> the area. Further study into these aspects would berequired to ensure that the proposed rezoning and development <strong>of</strong> the MKSEA will not contribute to thefurther degradation and loss <strong>of</strong> environmental values in the MKSEA, BFS 387 and BFS 53.The current survey identified and mapped areas <strong>of</strong> high conservation significance that should be excludedfrom development and proposed a number <strong>of</strong> general recommendations to assist in the prevention <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong>the ongoing current and anticipated degradation and loss <strong>of</strong> conservation values in the MKSEA, BFS 387and BFS 53. These recommendations (Section 7.1) include the urgent need to implement recovery actions formost <strong>of</strong> the Threatened Flora Species populations in the MKSEA and the Bush Forever Sites; theenforcement <strong>of</strong> native vegetation clearing regulations and wetland conservation measures; and theidentification and control <strong>of</strong> existing land uses that are currently impacting on groundwater quality. Anumber <strong>of</strong> changes to the management categories <strong>of</strong> wetlands in the MKSEA are recommended. Appropriatebuffer zones around Conservation and Resource Enhancement Category Wetlands and Ecological LinkageCorridors between high conservation value areas within the MKSEA, BFS 387, BFS 53, the Darling Rangeand Canning River are also proposed and mapped.Three major recommendations are presented below that summarise the most important conclusions <strong>of</strong> thecurrent survey with regard to the proposed development in the MKSEA.Recommendation 1Given the significant conservation values within and adjacent to the proposed MKSEA and the potential forthese values to be adversely impacted by the proposal, the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gosnells</strong> is advised <strong>of</strong> its obligation torefer, for assessment, the proposal to re-zone and develop these rural lands to:• The Federal Department <strong>of</strong> Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts (DEWHA) under the statutoryrequirements <strong>of</strong> the Federal Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999; and• The Western Australian Environmental Protection Authority under the statutory requirements <strong>of</strong> theWestern Australian Environmental Protection Act, 1986.Recommendation 2The <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gosnells</strong> is advised that further detailed studies are required to understand the hydrogeology <strong>of</strong>the highly water-dependent ecosystems <strong>of</strong> the MKSEA and the Greater Brixton Street Wetlands and toprovide the data required to remediate the hydrological regime <strong>of</strong> the area. The scope, methods and lowintensity <strong>of</strong> the current wetlands survey and the water monitoring programme recently commissioned by the<strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gosnells</strong> are considered insufficient to adequately map the major wetland boundaries, to characterisethe factors that maintain important conservation wetlands in the area and to define the environmental waterrequirements <strong>of</strong> the remnant native vegetation. Detailed mapping <strong>of</strong> the Muchea Limestone aquifers <strong>of</strong> thearea and an invertebrate study <strong>of</strong> the active Muchea Limestone mound spring in the MKSEA (and possiblyTauss, C. and Weston, A.S. (2010). The flora, vegetation and wetlands <strong>of</strong> the Maddington-Kenwick Strategic Employment Area.A survey <strong>of</strong> the rural lands in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the Greater Brixton Street Wetlands. Report to the <strong>City</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Gosnells</strong>, W.A. Version 18.04.10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!