20.07.2015 Views

PhD Thesis - staffweb - University of Greenwich

PhD Thesis - staffweb - University of Greenwich

PhD Thesis - staffweb - University of Greenwich

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>PhD</strong> <strong>Thesis</strong> by John Ewer.6 Research results6.1 OverviewIn order to investigate the potential effectiveness <strong>of</strong> user interaction techniques, forComputational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modelling, it was decided to choose an application areathat gave ready access to a number <strong>of</strong> CFD experts and furthermore was an application areawhere the accuracy and correct interpretation <strong>of</strong> results was <strong>of</strong> a safety critical nature. One suchtopic <strong>of</strong> research at the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Greenwich</strong> is Fire Field modelling. This application areais interesting because <strong>of</strong> the complexity <strong>of</strong> the geometry used in the simulations and therequirements for the modelling <strong>of</strong> high rates <strong>of</strong> heating and thermal radiation [KUMAR91].Furthermore, many fire simulations have to be performed in transient mode so that the timevarying nature <strong>of</strong> the simulation is revealed. This is partly due to the extremity <strong>of</strong> the physicsbeing modelled but also due to the types <strong>of</strong> question asked <strong>of</strong> the modelling which includes thedetermination <strong>of</strong> temperatures and smoke concentrations at certain times in order to researchsafety issues relating to, for example, fires in compartments and buildings [LEWIS97]. Theadded advantage <strong>of</strong> using this application area is that there is considerable “in-house” expertiseavailable for the use <strong>of</strong> fire field modelling. Of particular importance have been the comparisons[KERRISON94] [BJORKMAN95] <strong>of</strong> various CFD codes against the experimental work <strong>of</strong>Steckler [STECKLER82] which give a useful set <strong>of</strong> validation and comparison data for themodelling <strong>of</strong> fires within compartments.The results presented in this section are indicative rather than exhaustive but the intention hasbeen to demonstrate that the traditional techniques used for CFD in general and Fire Modellingin particular have mostly ignored the issues <strong>of</strong> interactive solution control, to their detriment.Recent questions about the reliability and accuracy <strong>of</strong> CFD techniques used in ever more criticalsimulations will, almost inevitably, tend to embrace technologies, such as interactive control andmonitoring, in order to give more assurance <strong>of</strong> solution correctness.The results presented here demonstrate that even expert CFD users can have significant6-90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!