20.07.2015 Views

PhD Thesis - staffweb - University of Greenwich

PhD Thesis - staffweb - University of Greenwich

PhD Thesis - staffweb - University of Greenwich

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>PhD</strong> <strong>Thesis</strong> by John Ewer.When Inactive regions occupy a greater proportion <strong>of</strong> the mesh savings in computational timecan be improved significantly.In the second example, the second door is opened after 40 seconds but rather than opening tothe outside it opens into an otherwise sealed compartment. The solution domain again consists<strong>of</strong> three distinct regions, the external region outside <strong>of</strong> the open door, the fire compartment andthe second, initially sealed, compartment. The computational mesh in each region comprises <strong>of</strong>8 x 22 cells, 22 x 22 cells and 30 x 22 cells respectively i.e. a total <strong>of</strong> 1320 cells. Using standardCFD solution techniques the solver operates equally in all the cells throughout the solutiondomain, even the cells in the second sealed and isolated compartment.Once again, the initially dormant region is marked as Inactive resulting in the numerical solverspending the minimum amount <strong>of</strong> effort in this region. When the second door opens after 40seconds, the Inactive region changes to Active and the solution domain extends to cover thesecond compartment. As in the previous case both solution techniques result in identicalsolutions prior to the opening <strong>of</strong> the second door. When both doors are opened, both methodsconverge to the steady state solution depicted in the figure (See Figure 7.2.3-3). However, usingthe conventional solver, the run time up to the point where the second door opens wasapproximately 4.40 hours while using the group solver this was reduced to 3.06 hours, a saving<strong>of</strong> 31%. Thus, by effectively reducing the computational domain by 50%, a saving incomputational time <strong>of</strong> 31% is achieved. This saving is less than might have been expected butit is explained by the need for initialisation and property updates that occur in all cells regardless<strong>of</strong> their group membership.More work is needed in this area to determine if there are benefits for the dynamic control <strong>of</strong>each group's solution controls.7.2.4 Investigation <strong>of</strong> dynamic groupsThe case used to investigate the use <strong>of</strong> dynamic group solvers is a preliminary investigation into7-109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!