20.07.2015 Views

PhD Thesis - staffweb - University of Greenwich

PhD Thesis - staffweb - University of Greenwich

PhD Thesis - staffweb - University of Greenwich

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>PhD</strong> <strong>Thesis</strong> by John Ewer.SOR solvers processing all cells equally. It should be noted that much <strong>of</strong> this saving is due tothe "de-coupled" void group which, as shown in Case 2, saves 26.1% <strong>of</strong> the processing. Theremaining 11.2% saving is due to the optimisation <strong>of</strong> processing within the extended regionwhich targets less solver processing in cells with relatively low velocity flow. The fact that thissaving is comparatively less than for the "de-coupled" region is also anticipated. This can beexplained by considering the work performed in the "de-coupled" and dynamic groups. In the"de-coupled" group, it was not necessary to build the system matrix coefficients for the membercells whereas any cell in a solved group that performs one (or more) iterations must build thesystem matrix coefficients in order to perform any calculation. Building the system matrixcoefficients is relatively costly compared to solving the matrix.The results indicate that there are large potential savings to be gained in the simulation <strong>of</strong> firemodelling scenarios by the targeting and optimisation <strong>of</strong> processing effort in fully de-coupled,suitably stratified or geometrically related flows. Furthermore, these savings need not result incompromised accuracy <strong>of</strong> the final solution. The techniques developed and presented hereresulted in considerable run-time savings <strong>of</strong> up to 37% <strong>of</strong> processing time. It is anticipated thatthis figure can be improved significantly when a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the balancing requiredbetween groups and variables is achieved.As group solvers are a new concept, there was little or no expertise to guide in the optimalselection <strong>of</strong> number <strong>of</strong> groups to use, the choice <strong>of</strong> group membership conditions and therelative amounts <strong>of</strong> processing used in each group. Furthermore there are a number <strong>of</strong> remaininggroup solver control options which were not varied during the test simulations.It is anticipated that in large scale simulations, which may involve whole buildings, there arelikely to be much greater savings possible with intelligent use <strong>of</strong> group solvers that can targetthe processing only on the active flow and fire regions until the solution characteristics in otherregions become significant.Current research efforts are directed at gaining a better understanding <strong>of</strong> when it is appropriate7-118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!