09.09.2015 Views

ADVANCE for Executive Insight 1 ADVANCE for Executive Insight

ADVANCE for Executive Insight 1 ADVANCE for Executive Insight

ADVANCE for Executive Insight 1 ADVANCE for Executive Insight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Healthcare IT<br />

By Cara Babachicos, MHA, CHCIO<br />

Will Post-Acute Sites<br />

Ever See Meaningful Use?<br />

When I speak with my acute care colleagues,<br />

they are often surprised to learn<br />

that meaningful use (EHR incentives)<br />

doesn’t include the post-acute sector. Some think<br />

it’s strange that meaningful use (MU) doesn’t consider<br />

electronic health records (EHR) systems <strong>for</strong><br />

rehabilitation, long term care and psychiatric hospitals,<br />

home care, hospice or nursing homes, while<br />

these facilities care <strong>for</strong> some of our sickest patients.<br />

Successful care transitions from acute to postacute<br />

are predicated on effective communication<br />

and coordination of the treatment plan with the<br />

next care provider. In facilities lacking the proper<br />

electronic coordination systems, a patient may be<br />

transported from the acute care facility to a postacute<br />

setting on a stretcher with a paper medical<br />

record attached to their jonnie, while they await<br />

an admissions person on the other side. This is by<br />

no means a well-coordinated transition.<br />

Keeping Pace<br />

With the focus on cutting cost and improving<br />

quality, it puts a healthcare provider at a huge<br />

disadvantage if they cannot keep up with the<br />

communication and documentation systems in<br />

place at the referring hospitals, not to mention<br />

the fact that they put themselves at a huge disadvantage<br />

in the Accountable Care Organization<br />

(ACO) marketplace. It is equally challenging <strong>for</strong><br />

post-acute to af<strong>for</strong>d this technology when they<br />

are significantly impacted by rate cuts.<br />

Some organizations like mine have made the<br />

investment in technology <strong>for</strong> post-acute, but other<br />

facilities are light years away. I worry about the<br />

many organizations that haven’t kept pace with<br />

technology because the lack of standardization<br />

and coordination of care will ultimately impact<br />

how healthcare is delivered. As a healthcare CIO,<br />

I know that MU and EHRs are by no means a<br />

panacea, but lack thereof could be a game changer<br />

<strong>for</strong> a patient if a significant note, medication<br />

order, or a specialist consult is missed in the coordination<br />

of care across the continuum.<br />

Some have suggested that a HIE would solve<br />

this problem, but without an electronic system<br />

at the receiving site it would be very difficult to<br />

have two-way sharing of patient data. The inefficiencies<br />

of rekeying the in<strong>for</strong>mation from a<br />

paper chart would be time consuming and burdensome,<br />

and a secondary process outside of the<br />

clinician workflow. In addition, scanned documents<br />

can have much variation.<br />

Regulatory Issues<br />

Maybe the key to integration with acute care is<br />

regulatory simplification? At present post-acute<br />

care requires different clinical documents and<br />

billing codes than acute care. FIM, MDS, HHRG,<br />

IRF-PAI are some of the terms you quickly become<br />

familiar with in the post-acute world. By<br />

simplifying and standardizing coding and documentation<br />

<strong>for</strong> post-acute it would make it far<br />

easier to extend the acute care products to the<br />

post-acute settings. Post- acute looks <strong>for</strong>ward to<br />

the day that there will be a common care tool, but<br />

at present the post-acute settings use different<br />

clinical documentation coding and billing mechanisms,<br />

making it difficult to even share tools/<br />

systems across post-acute. If we were to move<br />

away from the specialty codes and to a common<br />

care tool across all levels of care it would not only<br />

simplify the implementation of systems <strong>for</strong> postacute,<br />

but it would also allow organizations to<br />

truly understand the total cost and the quality of<br />

care delivery across the continuum.<br />

Predictions<br />

Will MU ever see the light of day in post-acute?<br />

Some are skeptical and have suggested that the<br />

MU dollars would be exhausted be<strong>for</strong>e it gets to<br />

post-acute sector. Others suggest that we will<br />

see some incentives in MU stage 3. I’m inclined<br />

Cara Babachicos is the CIO/corporate director of Community and Non Acute Sites at Partners Healthcare System.<br />

As a healthcare<br />

CIO, I know that<br />

MU and EHRs are<br />

by no means a<br />

panacea, but lack<br />

thereof could be<br />

a game changer<br />

<strong>for</strong> a patient if a<br />

significant note,<br />

medication order,<br />

or a specialist<br />

consult is missed<br />

in the coordination<br />

of care across<br />

the continuum.<br />

Healthcare IT is sponsored by<br />

the College of Health In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

Management <strong>Executive</strong>s<br />

(CHIME). Contact CHIME at www.<br />

cio-chime.com<br />

10 <strong>ADVANCE</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Insight</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!