09.09.2015 Views

ADVANCE for Executive Insight 1 ADVANCE for Executive Insight

ADVANCE for Executive Insight 1 ADVANCE for Executive Insight

ADVANCE for Executive Insight 1 ADVANCE for Executive Insight

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

VAP<br />

Cost Implications of VAP<br />

An equation developed by Johns Hopkins helps administrators quantify potential savings by<br />

reducing hospital-acquired infections. By Gail O. Guterl<br />

advance<br />

peer<br />

reviewed<br />

PR<br />

Gail O. Guterl is an editor and<br />

freelance medical writer.<br />

It would be utopia if quality patient care was<br />

the only engine driving healthcare today.<br />

The reality is a facility must generate profit<br />

to keep its doors open. But what if you could<br />

do both?<br />

Some expenditures can’t be avoided, but reducing<br />

hospital-acquired infections could be a<br />

big cost saver — especially now that the Centers<br />

<strong>for</strong> Medicare and Medicaid will not reimburse<br />

<strong>for</strong> many of these preventable complications.<br />

One of the most common hospital-acquired<br />

infections is ventilator-associated pneumonia<br />

(VAP), affecting about 250,000 people annually.<br />

It is also one of the most expensive, costing anywhere<br />

from $12,000 to $40,000 to treat one hospital<br />

case and with a 60 percent mortality rate. 1,2<br />

Each year in the U.S. a conservative estimate of<br />

collective VAP infections costs a whopping $3<br />

billion.<br />

Any way you approach it, reducing VAP could<br />

markedly impact the bottom line and, most importantly,<br />

improve patient care.<br />

PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS<br />

Understanding the problem is the first step to<br />

elimination. VAP is defined as pneumonia that<br />

occurs more than 48 hours after a patient has<br />

been intubated and has been receiving mechanical<br />

ventilation. For every day on a ventilator, the<br />

risk of VAP increases from 1 to 3 percent, said<br />

Sean M. Berenholtz, MD, MHS, FCCM, physician<br />

director of Inpatient Quality and Safety,<br />

Armstrong Institute <strong>for</strong> Patient Safety and Quality,<br />

Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore.<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e expensive treatment <strong>for</strong> VAP can even<br />

begin, diagnosis itself can be costly, including<br />

aggressive patient surveillance, bedside examination,<br />

X-rays and laboratory analysis of respiratory<br />

secretions.<br />

Believing prevention is achievable, researchers<br />

at the Armstrong Institute decided to tackle<br />

the issue head-on. The result: a five-point initiative<br />

that has virtually eliminated VAP in numerous<br />

hospitals, including 65 Michigan facilities<br />

that were part of the Keystone ICU project<br />

<strong>ADVANCE</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Executive</strong> <strong>Insight</strong><br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!