G E N E R A L S E S S I O N (1) watch > analog watch, mail > snail mail, weap<strong>on</strong> > c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>al weap<strong>on</strong>, etc. There has been very little discussi<strong>on</strong> of the phenomen<strong>on</strong> in the literature <strong>and</strong> of the structure <strong>and</strong> functi<strong>on</strong> of the mechanism that creates retr<strong>on</strong>yms. All available analyses more or less agree that in pairs like the <strong>on</strong>es in (1) above a general term (first member of the pair) is renamed to become more specific (sec<strong>on</strong>d member of the pair) because of the appearance of a new term that is coined in order to name a new inventi<strong>on</strong> or discovery, c<strong>on</strong>ceptually related to the old <strong>on</strong>e (see e.g. Ahmad & Collingham <str<strong>on</strong>g>19</str<strong>on</strong>g>96: 762-763, Anastasiadi-Syme<strong>on</strong>idi 2001: 68-69, Xydopoulos 2008: 164-165): (2) digital watch >> watch >> analog watch As shown in (2), the inventi<strong>on</strong> of “watches that display time in digits” led to the coinage of the term digital watch. The new term is the reas<strong>on</strong>, or else the (retr<strong>on</strong>ymy) instigator, for watch to become more specific with the additi<strong>on</strong> of a modifier that will differentiate it from the new term (i.e. analog as opposed to digital). In this paper, exp<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>on</strong> the available analyses, I view retr<strong>on</strong>ymy as a subcase of hyp<strong>on</strong>ymy <strong>and</strong> oppositeness relati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>on</strong> the basis of Cruse <str<strong>on</strong>g>19</str<strong>on</strong>g>86: 136 ff analysis of hyp<strong>on</strong>ymy <strong>and</strong> incompatibility, <strong>and</strong> make the following claims: • I underst<strong>and</strong> the two members of the retr<strong>on</strong>ymic pair, like in (1) above, as representing the hierarchical relati<strong>on</strong> of the superordinate <strong>and</strong> the subordinate term in hyp<strong>on</strong>ymy (cf. tax<strong>on</strong>ymy). • The new term, the so-called “retr<strong>on</strong>ymy instigator” is coined in such a way as to be incompatible with the modified old term. • Both the modified old term <strong>and</strong> the new term are co-hyp<strong>on</strong>yms of the, hypernymic, old term which, in its turn, has become an autohyp<strong>on</strong>ym. • Retr<strong>on</strong>yms appear in the source-language (mostly in English) <strong>and</strong> are transferred to other languages as loanwords/calques. Finally, <strong>on</strong> the basis of these claims I underst<strong>and</strong> the (recurring) mechanism that creates retr<strong>on</strong>yms as involving three phases that can be described as follows: (a) Creati<strong>on</strong> of a hyp<strong>on</strong>ym to name a new c<strong>on</strong>cept <strong>on</strong> the basis of its basic difference with the old c<strong>on</strong>cept: e.g. digital watch: “type of display” as the basic difference (cf. retr<strong>on</strong>ymy instigator) from watch. (b) Transformati<strong>on</strong> of the old term into an autohyp<strong>on</strong>ym: e.g. watch (meaning either “any watch” (generic) or “analog watch” (specific)). (c) Modificati<strong>on</strong> of the old term is modified with the additi<strong>on</strong> of an ant<strong>on</strong>ymic adjective (referring to the basic difference) to create a new incompatible co-hyp<strong>on</strong>ymic term: e.g. analog watch. Key references Ahmad, K. & Collingham, S. <str<strong>on</strong>g>19</str<strong>on</strong>g>96. Renewable Terminology. In M. Gellerstam et al (eds.) EURALEX '96: Proc. I-II, Part II - Papers submitted to the Seventh EURALEX <str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g> C<strong>on</strong>gress <strong>on</strong> Lexicography in Göteborg, Sweden. Göteborg: Göteborg University, Sweden, 759-771. Anastasiadi-Syme<strong>on</strong>idi, A. 2001. Rebaptism. In Hellenic Language <strong>and</strong> Terminology 3 rd C<strong>on</strong>ference Papers. Athens: Hellenic Society for Terminology, 63-77 Cruse, A. <str<strong>on</strong>g>19</str<strong>on</strong>g>86. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fromkin, V., R. Rodman & Hyams, N. 2003. An Introducti<strong>on</strong> to Language (7 th Editi<strong>on</strong>). Bost<strong>on</strong>, MA: Thoms<strong>on</strong>. Xydopoulos, G. J. 2008. Lexicology: Introducti<strong>on</strong> to the analysis of the word <strong>and</strong> the lexic<strong>on</strong>. Athens: Patakis. The status of Russian as an intracommunal language within the P<strong>on</strong>tic Greek community in Cyprus Di<strong>on</strong>ysios Zoumpalidis University of Cyprus denispace@hotmail.com The status of a particular language can be seen in terms of the frequency it is used for communicati<strong>on</strong> purposes within a particular speech community. The status of the Russian language within the P<strong>on</strong>tic Greek community in Cyprus is rather vague today. The majority of P<strong>on</strong>tic Greeks, who grew up <strong>and</strong> lived in the area of Caucasus, in Russia as well as in other parts of the former Soviet Uni<strong>on</strong>, have Russian as their dominant language since it was the language of administrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> educati<strong>on</strong>. Having moved to Cyprus in early <str<strong>on</strong>g>19</str<strong>on</strong>g>90s, P<strong>on</strong>tic Greeks started learning St<strong>and</strong>ard Modern Greek (SMG), <strong>and</strong> to a lesser extent the Cypriot Greek dialect, as in their majority they identify themselves as “Greeks”. The formal educati<strong>on</strong> in Cyprus, where the language of instructi<strong>on</strong> is SMG, presents an opportunity to younger P<strong>on</strong>tic Greeks to learn SMG as a sec<strong>on</strong>d (or even as a first) language. The present paper investigates the current status of the Russian language as it is reflected in interacti<strong>on</strong>s am<strong>on</strong>g P<strong>on</strong>tic Greeks who live permanently in Cyprus. Russian, which is seen as a <str<strong>on</strong>g>19</str<strong>on</strong>g> th ISTAL 62
G E N E R A L S E S S I O N minority language in the linguistic c<strong>on</strong>text in Cyprus, is examined in terms of the attitudes P<strong>on</strong>tic Greeks hold towards it. Likewise, the examinati<strong>on</strong> of the social networks within the community in questi<strong>on</strong>, provide a clearer sociolinguistic picture with regard to the current status of the Russian language. The preliminary results indicate that the status of the Russian language is not well established as some P<strong>on</strong>tic Greeks avoid Russian altogether whereas others use it systematically in their mundane interacti<strong>on</strong>s. The attitudes that P<strong>on</strong>tic Greeks hold towards the Russian language seem to correlate with age as well as with the geographical provenance of P<strong>on</strong>tic Greeks. <str<strong>on</strong>g>19</str<strong>on</strong>g> th ISTAL 63