Behavioral Programs for Diabetes Mellitus

Author, Year & Country
Comparison & Sample Size
(Number randomized
unless NR then # analyzed)
Age, Male, Non-White,
BMI/KG, HbA1c, Insulin
Treatment
Intervention Category &
Description
Total Duration Including all
Phases (m); Intensity (#
contacts, total contact
time); Maintenance/Support
Phase Duration
Method of Communication
(In-person, Mixed,
Technology)
Method of Delivery
(Individual, Group, Mixed)
& Presence of Supports
Delivery Personnel (Non-
HCP, Single HCP,
Multidisciplinary)
Degree of Tailoring
Community Engagement
Weinger, 2011
U.S. (MA) both
T1DM & T2DM
50:50%
I=74
AC 1= 75
AC 2= 73
(Mean, IQR)
I= 51.8 (23.7-
74.2)y
54%, 12%
29.4 (18.6-
51.5)kg/m 2
9.0 (7.6-12.6)%,
55.3%
AC 1= 54.7
(25.0-75.1)y
52%, 11%
29.4 (20.3-57.8)
kg/m 2
8.8 (7.6-13.6)%,
55.3%
I= DSME; CBTbased
group
education
program
AC 1= Non-DSME
(didactic group
sessions)
AC 2= Non-DSME
(individual RN &
RD consults
offered)
I= 1.5m; 5, 10h;
NA
AC 1= 1.5; 5, 10h;
NA
AC 2= 6m; NR,
NR; NA
I= In-person
AC 1= Inperson
AC 2= Inperson
I= Group
AC 1= Group
AC 2=
Individual
I=
Multidisciplinary
(RN, RD)
AC 1= RN
AC 2=
Multidisciplinary
(RN, RD)
I= Minimal –
Content
AC 1= Minimal
– Content
AC 2= Minimal
– Content &
Delivery
I=
None/NR
AC 1=
None/NR
AC 2=
None/NR
AC 2= 56.2
(21.6-74.8)y
42%, 15%
29.0 (17.8-50.4)
kg/m 2
8.6 (7.6-13.1)%,
55.3%
Welch, 2011
U.S. (MA)
I 1=58
I 2=57
Only 2 of
4 arms –
not
(Median,
Range)
I 1= 54.4±10.3y
37.9%, 21%
34.9±6.7kg/m 2
8.8±1.3%,
40.4%
I 1= DSME;
standard
I 2= DSME;
standard with MI
I 1= 6m; 4, 2.5h;
NA
I 2= 6m; 4, 2.5h;
NA
I 1= In-person
I 2= In-person
I 1= Individual
I 2= Individual
I 1= HCP (CDE)
I 2= HCP (CDE)
I 1= Minimal –
Content &
Delivery
I 2= Moderate-
I 1=
None/NR
I 2=
None/NR
F-57