Behavioral Programs for Diabetes Mellitus

Recommendations

Info

Table J2. Network meta-analysis results <strong>for</strong> HbA 1c <strong>for</strong> participants under 65 years of age Arm Description Rank Order of Intensity Method of Communication Delivery Method Delivery Personnel MD, 95% Credibility IntervaI Probability of Being Best Effect & Studies( only those removed from original analysis) Usual care 2, 3, 10- NA NA NA NA NA 0 [NA, NA] 0.0% 14 Active comparator 31 NA NA NA NA 0.12 [-0.23, 0.46] 0.0% (non-DSME) Active comparator 12 15, 16 NA NA NA NA -0.54 [-1.19, 0.10] 0.0% (other) DSME 18 16 ≤10h In person Individual & mixed HCP -0.33 [-0.68, 0.02] 0.0% 21 ≤10h In person Group only HCP -0.22 [-0.63, 0.19] 0.0% 29 ≤10h In person Group only Non-HCP -0.05 [-1.31, 1.21] 0.8% 27 12 ≤10h Some technology Individual & mixed HCP -0.09 [-0.51, 0.32] 0.0% 25 13 ≤10h Some technology Individual & mixed Non-HCP -0.15 [-0.55, 0.24] 0.0% 23 11-26h In person Individual & mixed HCP -0.17 [-0.83, 0.50] 0.0% 20 3, 11 11-26h In person Group only HCP -0.26 [-0.58, 0.06] 0.0% 17 2 11-26h In person Group only Non-HCP -0.38 [-0.97, 0.20] 0.0% 28 10 11-26h Some technology Individual & mixed HCP -0.06 [-0.63, 0.50] 0.0% 5 11-26h Some technology Individual & mixed Non-HCP -0.78 [-1.60, 0.04] 3.4% 26 11-26h Some technology Group only HCP -0.11 [-1.46, 1.22] 1.6% 7 ≥27h In person Individual & mixed HCP -0.73 [-1.92, 0.45] 7.7% 1 ≥27h In person Group only HCP -1.42 [-2.12, -0.72] 37.3% 13 ≥27h Some technology Individual & mixed HCP -0.49 [-1.72, 0.75] 3.8% DSME + Support 8 ≤10h In person Individual & mixed NA -0.71 [-1.85, 0.44] 6.5% 34 ≤10h In person Group only NA 2.82 [1.14, 4.48] 0.0% 19 16 ≤10h Some technology Individual & mixed NA -0.27 [-1.05, 0.51] 0.1% 15 11-26h In person Individual & mixed NA -0.43 [-1.77, 0.93] 4.2% 6 11-26h In person Group only NA -0.74 [-1.58, 0.10] 2.4% 16 11-26h Some technology Individual & mixed NA -0.39 [-1.09, 0.31] 0.1% 11 ≥27h In person Individual & mixed NA -0.54 [-1.32, 0.23] 0.8% 4 ≥27h In person Group only NA -0.88 [-1.89, 0.12] 8.5% Lifestyle 32 ≤10h In person Individual & mixed NA 0.21 [-0.51, 0.95] 0.0% 10 ≤10h In person Group only NA -0.60 [-1.62, 0.41] 2.3% 33 ≤10h Some technology Individual & mixed NA 0.26 [-1.13, 1.65] 0.5% 14 14 11-26h In person Individual & mixed NA -0.45 [-1.06, 0.16] 0.0% J-4
9 11-26h In person Group only NA -0.68 [-1.27, -0.09] 0.4% 3 11-26h Some technology Individual & mixed NA -0.91 [-1.75, -0.06] 6.6% 22 11-26h Some technology Group only NA -0.20 [-1.32, 0.92] 0.9% 2 ≥27h In person Individual & mixed NA -1.17 [-1.81, -0.55] 11.7% 30 ≥27h In person Group only NA 0.08 [-0.70, 0.86] 0.0% 24 15 ≥27h Some technology Individual & mixed NA -0.16 [-0.94, 0.62] 0.1% DSME = diabetes self-management education; h = hour(s); HCP = health care professional; MD = mean difference; NA = not applicable J-5
Page 1 and 2:
Evidence Report/Technology Assessme
Page 3 and 4:
This report is based on research co
Page 5 and 6:
Key Informants In designing the stu
Page 7 and 8:
Peer Reviewers Prior to publication
Page 9 and 10:
HbA 1c reduction were more often de
Page 11 and 12:
KQ 6. Subgroups for Factors Moderat
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 13. Behavioral programs for
Page 15 and 16:
glycemia in reducing the incidence
Page 17 and 18:
together with one or more additiona
Page 19 and 20:
Figure A. Analytic framework for be
Page 21 and 22:
Methods Literature Search Strategy
Page 23 and 24:
With input from our Technical Exper
Page 25 and 26:
participants had suboptimal baselin
Page 27 and 28:
duration of diabetes ranged from 2.
Page 29 and 30:
Table B. Type 1 diabetes: summary o
Page 31 and 32:
T2DM: Description and Risk of Bias
Page 33 and 34:
Figure D. Plot of network meta-anal
Page 35 and 36:
The positive findings for behaviora
Page 37 and 38:
elated to the Human Development Ind
Page 39 and 40:
Table D. Potential research needs b
Page 41 and 42:
References 1. Renders CM, Valk GD,
Page 43 and 44:
37. Chodosh J, Morton SC, Mojica W,
Page 45 and 46:
Introduction Background The high bu
Page 47 and 48:
Factors other than blood glucose co
Page 49 and 50:
may include interventions related t
Page 51 and 52:
programs. The overarching boxes (co
Page 53 and 54:
Figure 2. Analytic framework for be
Page 55 and 56:
American Diabetes Association, Amer
Page 57 and 58:
Table 1. Inclusion criteria for typ
Page 59 and 60:
S1 in the Supplementary File). The
Page 61 and 62:
clinically significant); we refer t
Page 63 and 64:
Synthesis for T1DM (KQs 1-4) KQ 1:
Page 65 and 66:
conducted for HbA 1c and body mass
Page 67 and 68:
Applicability We followed the Metho
Page 69 and 70:
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus This secti
Page 71 and 72:
therapy, 90,99,108 motivational enh
Page 73 and 74:
and a peer (with diabetes and train
Page 75 and 76:
followup (low SOE for both); there
Page 77 and 78:
Figure 6. Behavioral programs for t
Page 79 and 80:
similar results were found for yout
Page 81 and 82:
HbA 1c : Comparative Effectiveness
Page 83 and 84:
Two trials reported on adherence to
Page 85 and 86:
Table 4. Other clinical and behavio
Page 87 and 88:
Figure 14. Behavioral programs for
Page 89 and 90:
Health-Related Quality of Life: Beh
Page 91 and 92:
estimated effects were imprecise an
Page 93 and 94:
Table 8. Type 1 diabetes: summary o
Page 95 and 96:
Summary of Key Findings and Strengt
Page 97 and 98:
studies 82,94,95,105,109,112 were n
Page 99 and 100:
studied a DSME program in patients
Page 101 and 102:
I 2 =74%), 135,137,139,141,142,145,
Page 103 and 104:
Aerobic Fitness Test which estimate
Page 105 and 106:
Key Points: Body Mass Index • Lif
Page 107 and 108:
Table 12. Network meta-analysis for
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 20. Plot of network meta-ana
Page 115 and 116:
active comparator (20 trials, 7,709
Page 117 and 118:
Discussion Key Findings and Discuss
Page 119 and 120:
to be tempered by the findings of n
Page 121 and 122:
compared with usual care. There was
Page 123 and 124:
Our finding that single-topic, non-
Page 125 and 126:
In their systematic review and meta
Page 127 and 128:
For studies targeting adults, the m
Page 129 and 130:
environmental contextual factors—
Page 131 and 132:
assessors was also rarely reported,
Page 133 and 134:
Tailoring programs to ethnic minori
Page 135 and 136:
17. Centers for Disease Control and
Page 137 and 138:
53. Medical Advisory Secretariat. B
Page 139 and 140:
88. Ellis DA, Templin T, Naar-King
Page 141 and 142:
122. Nansel TR, Iannotti RJ, Simons
Page 143 and 144:
158. Cooper H, Booth K, Gill G. A t
Page 145 and 146:
191. Koo BK, Han KA, Ahn HJ, et al.
Page 147 and 148:
224. Sevick MA, Korytkowski M, Ston
Page 149 and 150:
260. Yuan C, Lai CW, Chan LW, et al
Page 151 and 152:
295. Ayling K, Brierley S, Johnson
Page 153 and 154:
Appendix A. Operational Definitions
Page 155 and 156:
the structured diet or physical act
Page 157 and 158:
Appendix B. Literature Search Strat
Page 159 and 160:
1. MeSH descriptor: [Diabetes Melli
Page 161 and 162:
35. “blood glucose” N2 monitor*
Page 163 and 164:
35. (behavio?r adj2 therap*).mp. 36
Page 165 and 166:
52. exp animals/ not humans.sh. 53.
Page 167 and 168:
57. "Follow-Up Studies"[Mesh] 58. "
Page 169 and 170:
URL provided by Michelle Crain, AAD
Page 171 and 172:
WHO ICTRP Trial Registry: WHO ICTRP
Page 173 and 174:
Appendix D. Studies Excluded After
Page 175 and 176:
Health. 2006;6:134. PMID: 16709243.
Page 177 and 178:
November/December;24(9):450-6. PMID
Page 179 and 180:
89. Dinneen SF, O'hara MC, Byrne M,
Page 181 and 182:
119. Fitzpatrick SL, Jeffery R, Joh
Page 183 and 184:
Aug;19(8):835-42. PMID: 8842601. Ex
Page 185 and 186:
adherence and metabolic control. Di
Page 187 and 188:
May;36(5):1297-303. PMID: 23223405.
Page 189 and 190:
244. Korytkowski MT, Koerbel GL, Ko
Page 191 and 192:
275. Maljanian R, Grey N, Staff I,
Page 193 and 194:
306. Naccashian Z. The impact of di
Page 195 and 196:
led structured program on blood glu
Page 197 and 198:
Engineering. 2014;75(1-B E). PMID:
Page 199 and 200:
395. Skoro-Kondza L, Tai SS, Gadelr
Page 201 and 202:
426. Torbjornsen A, Jenum AK, Smast
Page 203 and 204:
Americans with type 2 diabetes. J A
Page 205 and 206:
patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract.
Page 207 and 208:
Table E1. Risk of bias for studies
Page 209 and 210:
Weinger, 2011 L M NA M NA L NA L L
Page 211 and 212:
Cramer, 2007 M M H M H L H H L M H
Page 213 and 214:
Ridgeway, 1999 M M H M H L H H M L
Page 215 and 216:
Appendix F. Description of Studies
Page 217 and 218:
Author, Year & Country Comparison &
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Table F3. Description of studies an
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258: Author, Year & Country Comparison &
Page 277 and 278: Appendix H. Strength of Evidence Ta
Page 279 and 280: Outcome # Trials (# Subjects); Tool
Page 281 and 282: Table H3. Behavioral programs compa
Page 283 and 284: 16. Mayer-Davis EJ, Seid M, Crandel
Page 285 and 286: Table I1. Effectiveness of behavior
Page 287 and 288: Category Health Outcomes Outcomes A
Page 289 and 290: Table I2. Effectiveness of behavior
Page 291 and 292: Category Outcomes Timepoint Health
Page 293 and 294: Outcome Change in Body Composition
Page 295 and 296: Outcome Change in Physical Activity
Page 297 and 298: References for Appendix I 1. Adachi
Page 299 and 300: 32. Rock CL, Flatt SW, Pakiz B, et
Page 301 and 302: follow-up study. Diabetes Res Clin
Page 303 and 304: 98. Johnson ST, Bell GJ, Mccargar L
Page 305 and 306: Appendix J. Network Meta-Analysis R
Page 307: 5 11-26h In person Group only NA -0
show all

Behavioral Programs for Diabetes Mellitus

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?