08.10.2015 Views

Chapter 125

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2078 PART 5 ■ Anesthetic, Surgical, and Interventional Procedures: Considerations<br />

the “strategic” part of the dental arch and are essential for satisfactory<br />

oral function and comfort. 34 Every effort should be made to<br />

retain these teeth and some molar function for patients.<br />

Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery<br />

The scope of practice of the pediatric oral and maxillofacial<br />

surgeon varies widely between institutions and countries. Craniomaxillofacial<br />

surgery falls within the domain of the maxillofacial<br />

surgeon, the plastic surgeon, and the otolaryngologist. The case<br />

mix and procedures carried out by given specialties is locally<br />

determined and often has a historical bias. There may be overlap<br />

in the treatment of pediatric patients with cleft lip and palate,<br />

congenital and developmental dentofacial deformities, and craniomaxillofacial<br />

pathology. Often more than one specialty is involved<br />

in complicated craniomaxillofacial cases treated under general<br />

anesthesia. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons commonly perform a<br />

wide variety of procedures, including: surgical alteration of skeletal<br />

relationships of the maxillomandibular complex utilizing distraction<br />

osteogenesis and orthognathic osteotomy techniques,<br />

surgical placement of primary and secondary alveolar cleft bone<br />

grafts, treatment of fractures of the maxillofacial complex, placement<br />

of osseointegrated dental implants, and surgical management<br />

of maxillofacial pathosis. The majority of these procedures<br />

are performed under general anesthesia in hospital.<br />

ANESTHESIA CONCERNS<br />

Deaths associated with dental treatment under sedation or general<br />

anesthesia are difficult to accept and usually highly publicized,<br />

particularly when they occur in healthy children undergoing dental<br />

procedures. Studies of general anesthesia accidents have increased<br />

awareness of the importance of monitoring ambulatory cases to<br />

reduce morbidity and mortality. 35,36 The risk management<br />

committee of Harvard Medical School’s department of anesthesia<br />

devised the first specific standards for patient monitoring during<br />

anesthesia in medicine (The Harvard Minimal Intraoperative<br />

Monitoring Standards) in 1985. 37 These standards were developed<br />

in the wake of a number of anesthetic mishaps deemed preventable<br />

with adequate monitoring. The American Society of<br />

Anesthesiology then formulated a national standard, the ASA<br />

Standards for Basic Intraoperative Monitoring. 38 Dental specialty<br />

organizations and regulatory colleges have since issued guidelines<br />

for the use of sedation and general anesthesia in dental offices and<br />

outpatient clinics. 39,40 As the pharmacologic impact of the sedation<br />

procedure increases, guidelines require additional training, patient<br />

monitoring, and facility visits. To the other extreme, legislation in<br />

the United Kingdom permits only medical anesthesiologists to<br />

administer a general anesthetic for dental treatment. 41 Although<br />

regulations vary considerably nationally and internationally, both<br />

general dentists and specialists in most countries commonly use<br />

oral premedication and nitrous oxide–oxygen. Combinations of<br />

nitrous oxide–oxygen and other agents (oral or parenteral) are<br />

most often used in the offices and clinics of dental specialists with<br />

specific training in their use. In countries where legislation permits,<br />

general anesthesia induced by parenteral or inhalation agents and<br />

administered by dentists, is found exclusively in the clinics of dental<br />

specialists with specific clinical and academic training.<br />

It is inevitable that dentists will continue to use nitrous oxide–<br />

oxygen inhalation and oral and parenteral techniques for sedation<br />

TABLE <strong>125</strong>-4. 1991 Recommended Standards of Practice<br />

for Dental Anesthesia and Sedation in the United Kingdom<br />

The same standards of monitoring and personnel necessary for<br />

patient safety shall apply wherever general anesthetics are<br />

administered.<br />

An electrocardiogram, a pulse oximeter, and a noninvasive<br />

blood pressure measuring device are essential for the<br />

noninvasive monitoring of a patient under general anesthesia.<br />

A capnograph should be used where tracheal anaesthesia is<br />

practised.<br />

A defibrillator must be available.<br />

General anesthetic surgeries should be subject to inspection and<br />

registration.<br />

Every member of the dental team should be trained in<br />

resuscitation.<br />

Every dental surgery should be equipped to enable resuscitation<br />

to be performed.<br />

Poswillo D. 42<br />

due to patient demand for pain and anxiety control and<br />

insufficient availability of hospital operating room time. Recent<br />

years have seen the imposition of guidelines and legislation in<br />

many countries that require defined levels of clinical and academic<br />

education, office preparation, and equipment requirements for use<br />

of sedation and general anesthesia by dentists (Table <strong>125</strong>–4). 42<br />

Guidelines often include facility inspections, credentials, and<br />

licenses. When anesthetic emergencies occur in private offices or<br />

clinics there is often a violation of existing guidelines. It was<br />

concluded, in a comprehensive review of published studies of<br />

anesthesia-related injuries, that with adequate monitoring at least<br />

50% of patient injuries could be avoided. 43<br />

It is important that dentists and physicians involved in dental<br />

anesthesia outside of hospital remain up to date with current<br />

guidelines regarding standards for pharmacologic management of<br />

dental patients. Dentists should be familiar with the American<br />

Society of Anesthesiologists classification of patients’ medical status<br />

and adhere to guidelines regarding its use in patient selection.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Rasmussen JK, Frederiksen JA, Hallonsten A-L, Poulsen S. Danish dentists’<br />

knowledge, attitudes and management of procedural dental pain in<br />

children: association with demographic characteristics, structural factors,<br />

perceived stress during administration of local analgesia and their tolerance<br />

towards pain. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15:159–168.<br />

2. Acs G, Musson C-AW, Burke MJ. Current teaching of restraint and<br />

sedation in pediatric dentistry: a survey of program directors. Pediatr Dent.<br />

1990;12:364–367.<br />

3. Weinstein P, Domoto PK, Getz TG. Difficult children: the practical<br />

experience of 145 private practitioners. Pediatr Dent. 1981;3:303–305.<br />

4. Holst A, Crossner C-G. Direct ratings of acceptance of dental treatment in<br />

Swedish children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987;15:258–263.<br />

5. Davis MJ. Conscious sedation practices in pediatric dentistry: a survey of<br />

members of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry College of<br />

Diplomates. Pediatr Dent. 1988;10:328–329.<br />

6. Eidelman E, Faibis S, Peretz B. A comparison of restorations for children<br />

with early childhood caries treated under general anesthesia or conscious<br />

sedation. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:33–37.<br />

7. Day PF, Power AM, Hibbert SA, SA Paterson. Effectiveness of oral<br />

midazolam for paediatric dental care: a retrospective study in two specialist<br />

centres. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7:228–235.<br />

8. MacCormac C, Kinirons M. Reasons for referral of children to a general<br />

anaesthetic service in Northern Ireland. Int J Paed Dent. 1998;8:191–196.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!