Chapter 125
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2078 PART 5 ■ Anesthetic, Surgical, and Interventional Procedures: Considerations<br />
the “strategic” part of the dental arch and are essential for satisfactory<br />
oral function and comfort. 34 Every effort should be made to<br />
retain these teeth and some molar function for patients.<br />
Pediatric Maxillofacial Surgery<br />
The scope of practice of the pediatric oral and maxillofacial<br />
surgeon varies widely between institutions and countries. Craniomaxillofacial<br />
surgery falls within the domain of the maxillofacial<br />
surgeon, the plastic surgeon, and the otolaryngologist. The case<br />
mix and procedures carried out by given specialties is locally<br />
determined and often has a historical bias. There may be overlap<br />
in the treatment of pediatric patients with cleft lip and palate,<br />
congenital and developmental dentofacial deformities, and craniomaxillofacial<br />
pathology. Often more than one specialty is involved<br />
in complicated craniomaxillofacial cases treated under general<br />
anesthesia. Oral and maxillofacial surgeons commonly perform a<br />
wide variety of procedures, including: surgical alteration of skeletal<br />
relationships of the maxillomandibular complex utilizing distraction<br />
osteogenesis and orthognathic osteotomy techniques,<br />
surgical placement of primary and secondary alveolar cleft bone<br />
grafts, treatment of fractures of the maxillofacial complex, placement<br />
of osseointegrated dental implants, and surgical management<br />
of maxillofacial pathosis. The majority of these procedures<br />
are performed under general anesthesia in hospital.<br />
ANESTHESIA CONCERNS<br />
Deaths associated with dental treatment under sedation or general<br />
anesthesia are difficult to accept and usually highly publicized,<br />
particularly when they occur in healthy children undergoing dental<br />
procedures. Studies of general anesthesia accidents have increased<br />
awareness of the importance of monitoring ambulatory cases to<br />
reduce morbidity and mortality. 35,36 The risk management<br />
committee of Harvard Medical School’s department of anesthesia<br />
devised the first specific standards for patient monitoring during<br />
anesthesia in medicine (The Harvard Minimal Intraoperative<br />
Monitoring Standards) in 1985. 37 These standards were developed<br />
in the wake of a number of anesthetic mishaps deemed preventable<br />
with adequate monitoring. The American Society of<br />
Anesthesiology then formulated a national standard, the ASA<br />
Standards for Basic Intraoperative Monitoring. 38 Dental specialty<br />
organizations and regulatory colleges have since issued guidelines<br />
for the use of sedation and general anesthesia in dental offices and<br />
outpatient clinics. 39,40 As the pharmacologic impact of the sedation<br />
procedure increases, guidelines require additional training, patient<br />
monitoring, and facility visits. To the other extreme, legislation in<br />
the United Kingdom permits only medical anesthesiologists to<br />
administer a general anesthetic for dental treatment. 41 Although<br />
regulations vary considerably nationally and internationally, both<br />
general dentists and specialists in most countries commonly use<br />
oral premedication and nitrous oxide–oxygen. Combinations of<br />
nitrous oxide–oxygen and other agents (oral or parenteral) are<br />
most often used in the offices and clinics of dental specialists with<br />
specific training in their use. In countries where legislation permits,<br />
general anesthesia induced by parenteral or inhalation agents and<br />
administered by dentists, is found exclusively in the clinics of dental<br />
specialists with specific clinical and academic training.<br />
It is inevitable that dentists will continue to use nitrous oxide–<br />
oxygen inhalation and oral and parenteral techniques for sedation<br />
TABLE <strong>125</strong>-4. 1991 Recommended Standards of Practice<br />
for Dental Anesthesia and Sedation in the United Kingdom<br />
The same standards of monitoring and personnel necessary for<br />
patient safety shall apply wherever general anesthetics are<br />
administered.<br />
An electrocardiogram, a pulse oximeter, and a noninvasive<br />
blood pressure measuring device are essential for the<br />
noninvasive monitoring of a patient under general anesthesia.<br />
A capnograph should be used where tracheal anaesthesia is<br />
practised.<br />
A defibrillator must be available.<br />
General anesthetic surgeries should be subject to inspection and<br />
registration.<br />
Every member of the dental team should be trained in<br />
resuscitation.<br />
Every dental surgery should be equipped to enable resuscitation<br />
to be performed.<br />
Poswillo D. 42<br />
due to patient demand for pain and anxiety control and<br />
insufficient availability of hospital operating room time. Recent<br />
years have seen the imposition of guidelines and legislation in<br />
many countries that require defined levels of clinical and academic<br />
education, office preparation, and equipment requirements for use<br />
of sedation and general anesthesia by dentists (Table <strong>125</strong>–4). 42<br />
Guidelines often include facility inspections, credentials, and<br />
licenses. When anesthetic emergencies occur in private offices or<br />
clinics there is often a violation of existing guidelines. It was<br />
concluded, in a comprehensive review of published studies of<br />
anesthesia-related injuries, that with adequate monitoring at least<br />
50% of patient injuries could be avoided. 43<br />
It is important that dentists and physicians involved in dental<br />
anesthesia outside of hospital remain up to date with current<br />
guidelines regarding standards for pharmacologic management of<br />
dental patients. Dentists should be familiar with the American<br />
Society of Anesthesiologists classification of patients’ medical status<br />
and adhere to guidelines regarding its use in patient selection.<br />
REFERENCES<br />
1. Rasmussen JK, Frederiksen JA, Hallonsten A-L, Poulsen S. Danish dentists’<br />
knowledge, attitudes and management of procedural dental pain in<br />
children: association with demographic characteristics, structural factors,<br />
perceived stress during administration of local analgesia and their tolerance<br />
towards pain. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15:159–168.<br />
2. Acs G, Musson C-AW, Burke MJ. Current teaching of restraint and<br />
sedation in pediatric dentistry: a survey of program directors. Pediatr Dent.<br />
1990;12:364–367.<br />
3. Weinstein P, Domoto PK, Getz TG. Difficult children: the practical<br />
experience of 145 private practitioners. Pediatr Dent. 1981;3:303–305.<br />
4. Holst A, Crossner C-G. Direct ratings of acceptance of dental treatment in<br />
Swedish children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987;15:258–263.<br />
5. Davis MJ. Conscious sedation practices in pediatric dentistry: a survey of<br />
members of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry College of<br />
Diplomates. Pediatr Dent. 1988;10:328–329.<br />
6. Eidelman E, Faibis S, Peretz B. A comparison of restorations for children<br />
with early childhood caries treated under general anesthesia or conscious<br />
sedation. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:33–37.<br />
7. Day PF, Power AM, Hibbert SA, SA Paterson. Effectiveness of oral<br />
midazolam for paediatric dental care: a retrospective study in two specialist<br />
centres. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7:228–235.<br />
8. MacCormac C, Kinirons M. Reasons for referral of children to a general<br />
anaesthetic service in Northern Ireland. Int J Paed Dent. 1998;8:191–196.