08.12.2015 Views

“The Death Issue” December 2015 1

1IAb5Bp

1IAb5Bp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

censors, are usually dumb you know, don't get that. Oh, it's about bees it can't be that<br />

interesting.<br />

OV: we skirted around it a little bit, but it may be a bit of a dumb question itself, but<br />

about politics. Can poetry be political, should poets be politically active?<br />

JB: it's not so much a question of can poetry be political, or should it, because everything<br />

we do is political. Any public act, and a lot of private ones too, to write a poem may not be<br />

political but to publish it is a political act. And it's saying, it's a statement of alignment<br />

with one or another view of the world. You know, if I write a poem that says you know,<br />

from an eighteenth century poet who writes a poem about how wonderful the king is, and<br />

it says that the king is at the top of the tree and everyone else should be below, and<br />

supports divine rule on earth, all that stuff, then that's a political poem, sure. But, anything<br />

which supports a hierarchical vision of human society, or anything that aligns the natural<br />

world with something like that, is also a political statement, so if I write a poem now that<br />

says that there is some natural hierarchical structure, in things, I'll be making a certain<br />

kind of political statement. If I make a statement that makes it clear you feel that the only,<br />

the only way in which people should be rewarded is based on merit and their contribution<br />

to society, in all kinds of ways, that's also a political poem. Usually a poem isn't overtly<br />

political, because it makes it all black and white. It's usually an implication about<br />

something political. So any poem I write is political. So I write a love poem that the<br />

conventional idea of love doesn't work – not for me, anyway -, that romance is another<br />

trick by which capitalist society – you know I wouldn't say that overtly, that capitalists are<br />

making me fall in love -, but, if I'm critical of the idea of romantic love in a poem that's a<br />

political act. And that's political, and its directly anti-capitalist. The conventional image we<br />

have of romance in institutions like marriage, etc, serve the capitalist model. So if you say<br />

something against that – even tiny, tiny things -, it's not a huge gesture, it doesn't change<br />

the world. Poems aren't supposed to change the world. But they can drip-feed. Yeah, all<br />

poems are political statements, whether intended or not, there still something political.<br />

OV: so when you talk about capitalist institution of marriage, and you mentioned Marx<br />

earlier, do you affiliate more with – I don't mean in a historical materialist, Marxian way<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!